GiroDisk to stock weight comparison
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 803
Likes: 76
From: Godfrey, Ill
GiroDisk to stock weight comparison
To put this to bed.....The front GiroDisk 340mm rotor weight 1.15 lb less per rotor than a new stock 318mm rotor. The rear 325mm GiroDisk rotor weighs 1.5 lb more than a somewhat worn stock 299mm rotor.
GR front=18.09
GR rear 15.5
stock front=19.24
stock rear=14
you might wonder why. I think (by looking) the rear GD iron part has greater metal to air ratio than the front GD. also (325/299)^2 is greater than (340/318)^2
GR front=18.09
GR rear 15.5
stock front=19.24
stock rear=14
you might wonder why. I think (by looking) the rear GD iron part has greater metal to air ratio than the front GD. also (325/299)^2 is greater than (340/318)^2
Last edited by dougn; Aug 17, 2022 at 01:53 PM.
Rennlist Member
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 3,028
From: Miami
To put this to bed.....The front GiroDisk 340mm rotor weight 1.15 lb less per rotor than a new stock 318mm rotor. The rear 325mm GiroDisk rotor weighs 1.5 lb more than a somewhat worn stock 299mm rotor.
GR front=18.09
GR rear 15.5
stock front=19.24
stock rear=14
you might wonder why. I think (by looking) the rear GD iron part has greater metal to air ratio than the front GD
GR front=18.09
GR rear 15.5
stock front=19.24
stock rear=14
you might wonder why. I think (by looking) the rear GD iron part has greater metal to air ratio than the front GD
