Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Regarding my fabspeed potential install…
Do it !
56.25%
Don’t do it
18.75%
Exhaust only
9.38%
Some other combo and then explain
15.63%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Fabspeed whole kit and caboodle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2022 | 09:02 PM
  #1  
kincedn9's Avatar
kincedn9
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 84
Likes: 41
From: South Jersey
Default Fabspeed whole kit and caboodle

I have bone stock low miles 2004 c4s. Runs great, and I’m about to do something either awesome or stupid. But wanted to share my experience start to finish.

im going to have the performance package( headers, sport cats, xpipe, mufflers, intake, tune)
plus the IPD plenum with the larger throttle body.

lots of umm, opinions out there regarding this stuff, but I am a car nut and I am crazy as we all are and can’t just drive it without farting around with it. Anywho. When you order from the factory it takes about 5 weeks for them to make the system. I live close enough to the factory that I am going to have them install as well. This could either be a good thing or a dumb thing. But hey. Life is an adventure.

Some thoughts leading up to this. Bore scoring. I by all indirect signs have a healthy engine. Haven’t done a bore scope. does the hive think this may exacerbate the potential issue? Should I install the low temp thermostat? It’s a summer, good weather kind of driver only. Try to avoid too many local quick stop and go trips if u can.

couple of weeks til the build is complete and I can have it installed. Thought some conversation on here leading up to it would build suspense or talk me out of it altogether.
If I take the plunge then I can also provide some real world impressions from the perspective of a car dude who is not a mechanic/engineer/know it all.




Last edited by kincedn9; 06-11-2022 at 09:17 PM.
The following users liked this post:
barbancourt (06-11-2022)
Old 06-11-2022 | 09:37 PM
  #2  
GC996's Avatar
GC996
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 5,805
Likes: 4,160
From: Illinois
Default

Hey man, good luck with it. Fabspeed offered before and after dynos. Please take them up on it and let us know your improvement. You only live once, might as well do it with a complete exhaust package including software and intake improvements.
The following 3 users liked this post by GC996:
brontosaurus (06-13-2022), C2-996 (06-24-2022), kincedn9 (06-11-2022)
Old 06-11-2022 | 09:50 PM
  #3  
barbancourt's Avatar
barbancourt
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 849
Likes: 504
Default

Subscribed!

Really interested in your results!
The following users liked this post:
kincedn9 (06-11-2022)
Old 06-11-2022 | 10:01 PM
  #4  
GC996's Avatar
GC996
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 5,805
Likes: 4,160
From: Illinois
Default

This is an incredible opportunity for fabspeed selling all of us the package by showing the before and after dyno! Joe Fab should take advantage of this soft pitch.
The following 3 users liked this post by GC996:
barbancourt (06-12-2022), C2-996 (06-24-2022), kincedn9 (06-11-2022)
Old 06-11-2022 | 11:23 PM
  #5  
EVOMMM's Avatar
EVOMMM
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1,718
From: NY NY
Default

Do it do it do it
The following users liked this post:
kincedn9 (06-12-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 12:43 AM
  #6  
rechtien's Avatar
rechtien
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 356
Likes: 74
Default

That is steep. Id pass and put the 8k after tax towards a rebuild with bigger bore.
The following 3 users liked this post by rechtien:
kincedn9 (06-12-2022), peterp (06-12-2022), wdb (06-12-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 02:34 AM
  #7  
golock911's Avatar
golock911
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 895
Likes: 977
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Cool project. Agreed with others, if documented well, this could help solidify arguments before & after. Please get the bores scoped before any work. You should have this as a starting point. I don't think anything you are going to do would make scoring any more likely, but it might change your decision on when to add all the goodies. My current belief is that the best performance after changing how the engine breathes is the tune. You won't realize optimal performance unless the computer understands the change in air flow and can use it. We talk about the computer adapting to our driving or the current engine conditions, but I don't know how far that adapting goes when you change the inputs and outputs by so much. It really needs an individual tune. Good luck! it will be fun watching! Post early and often!
The following 4 users liked this post by golock911:
2005 996 C4S (09-16-2022), GC996 (06-12-2022), kincedn9 (06-12-2022), NYoutftr (06-24-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 02:34 AM
  #8  
oregondave's Avatar
oregondave
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 845
Likes: 161
Default

Definitely skip the plenum, it does NOTHING
Old 06-12-2022 | 02:43 AM
  #9  
GC996's Avatar
GC996
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 5,805
Likes: 4,160
From: Illinois
Default

What we should do is take bets on how much improvement actually is realized for $8,000. My bet is 2 hp for every $1,000 or 16hp total.
The following 2 users liked this post by GC996:
dporto (06-12-2022), kincedn9 (06-12-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 02:48 AM
  #10  
kincedn9's Avatar
kincedn9
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 84
Likes: 41
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by rechtien
That is steep. Id pass and put the 8k after tax towards a rebuild with bigger bore.
A rebuild with a bigger bore sounds even steeper. A “ you may as well “ argument. Every project has its limits and its goals. Don’t want a new engine. Just breathe a little more life into the one I have. Bolt on bolt off. Maintain the integrity of factory build. It’s only done 29,000 miles. I’d tear down and rebuild only after it’s been ridden hard put away wet.

Old 06-12-2022 | 02:56 AM
  #11  
Type65's Avatar
Type65
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 420
Likes: 251
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Originally Posted by rechtien
That is steep. Id pass and put the 8k after tax towards a rebuild with bigger bore.
Even if you did this you'd still want to at least change the exhaust to something else. My car has a 3.4 to 3.6 with bone stock exhaust and the sound is pretty sad to say the least. Probably the quietest/worst sounding exhaust of any car I have ever owned and I think M96s have the potential to sound amazing. I will never understand why Porsche opted for the mufflers they did. I haven't decided what route I want to go yet though, so it's stock exhaust for me for now.

To the op, I say go for it and document the results if you can. I will also throw out that Soul has been getting a lot of love lately and might be worth a look if you haven't checked them out yet.

Edit: I see you are in South Jersey, definitely see if you can't take Fabspeed up on their offer to Dyno test the before/after. I can't remember the name of the thread that that discussion was in, but it was started by ZBomb.

Last edited by Type65; 06-12-2022 at 02:57 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Type65:
GC996 (06-12-2022), kincedn9 (06-12-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 09:40 AM
  #12  
philbert996's Avatar
philbert996
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 1,186
From: Philly Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by oregondave
Definitely skip the plenum, it does NOTHING
2 recent dyno tests on ‘99 3.4s prove that the IPD plenum does work.
It increases the hp and torque throughout the rev range.
But I haven’t seen any good ( same day/conditions/dyno) tests on the 3.6.




The following 2 users liked this post by philbert996:
kincedn9 (06-12-2022), TheChunkNorris (06-12-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 10:10 AM
  #13  
GC996's Avatar
GC996
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 5,805
Likes: 4,160
From: Illinois
Default

Tests using the 3.6 don't show any improvement using oem headers. I will eventually test the fvd m&m headers by adding then to my 200 cell cats and sport exhaust which fvd claims can extract some performance from the ipd/tb. But not until next year.

But it will be very interesting to see the aggregate improvement in power the OP gets with the fabspeed kit since it includes everything. Doubt they will be willing to do a dyno part by part. But you never know.
The following users liked this post:
kincedn9 (06-12-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 10:41 AM
  #14  
dporto's Avatar
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,808
Likes: 1,186
From: L.I. NY
Default

If it’s just the sound that bothers you do the Fister or Gundo hack and save $7500.00… If you really need to dump the cash go for it - just don’t expect some kind of magical performance boost… ain’t gonna happen
The following 3 users liked this post by dporto:
GC996 (06-12-2022), kincedn9 (06-12-2022), peterp (06-12-2022)
Old 06-12-2022 | 11:17 AM
  #15  
TheChunkNorris's Avatar
TheChunkNorris
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 2,167
From: Miami
Default

I'm curious to see what you make, I'd suggest having Fabspeed do the dyno comparison they've been talking about for some time. Justin has a very similar set up btw.
The following users liked this post:
kincedn9 (06-12-2022)


Quick Reply: Fabspeed whole kit and caboodle



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:07 PM.