Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

4.0l 996 with x51, is it possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2020 | 07:40 PM
  #16  
De Jeeper's Avatar
De Jeeper
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 5,957
Likes: 3,580
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by TJW996c4s
whenever it get to the dyno ill see whatever it makes and ill let everyone know but i probably have just been putting the numbers together wrong the whole time in which case thank you for correcting me, didn't mean to start a hp uproar/sorry for the ignorance per se. Pretty new actually being in the car scene so trial by fire i guess lol.

just happy to have an answer about whether or not x51 is conducive to adding a 4.0L

to speak to your original question, i think u will find that a .2l bump is all u want to do in a non-metz motor. Engine builders that have been doing this for years struggle to get 40-50 hp more out if a base motor. Some of this is done by using x51 build logic so im not even sure those gains r available in your motor.

i say if u have the funds go for it. Remember that the brighter the candle burns the shorter it lasts.
Old 11-23-2020 | 07:41 PM
  #17  
theprf's Avatar
theprf
Race Car
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 3,872
Likes: 1,910
From: Central MA
Default

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
from what i've seen, porsche did not rate m96 cars conservatively...at least those in the 996.

I'd say your car probably makes, generously, 370 crank hp (which is what porsche rates it at). When you consider your drive train losses, on a an AWD car, you'd be looking at 20% ish. So, if you do the matter, you end up around 296rwhp. I rounded to 300.
Actually it's rated at 345 engine HP. At least that's what the book says.
Most people on this forum would be happy with a reliable 345HP, it seems.
Old 11-23-2020 | 07:49 PM
  #18  
TLV996c4s's Avatar
TLV996c4s
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

so you would say just going to a 3.8L would be better than doing a 4.0L and then whatever that gets me just leave it as it is? just looking to make it a better street car with more life in it, but i also want it to last so that bit was helpful @De Jeeper 3.8L and take whatever i can get from that.

would anyone say i'm better off just buying another car at a certain point with how much money i would be putting into it, i.e. a turbo or gt3, something along those lines that come with more powerful motors to begin with?
Old 11-23-2020 | 08:03 PM
  #19  
Mike Murphy's Avatar
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 1,781
From: Chicago, IL
Default

You might try stuffing a Chevy smallblock in there if you want 600HP. I wouldn’t want a 996 engine to have anything close to that. Even the 996tt guys aren’t pushing too much beyond 480 without serious mods. But then 600+ is possible if you with that engine combination.
Old 11-23-2020 | 08:33 PM
  #20  
theprf's Avatar
theprf
Race Car
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 3,872
Likes: 1,910
From: Central MA
Default

The Flat 6 Innovations boys can up it 4.0 liters and suggest, with their supporting mods, that's worth 100 hp +/- over stock. That is probably the closest you will come to a reliable "500" HP M96.

It's simple to get 480 HP from a 3.6 Mezger powered Turbo. 550 is not unreasonable. From there, bring truckloads of money and you can have anything you want, 1200 hp is doable.

Have you driven the car with it's 345 HP? I'm pretty sure it is fast as-is.
Old 11-23-2020 | 08:35 PM
  #21  
Alpine 996 c4s's Avatar
Alpine 996 c4s
4th Gear
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

just joined today, looking at doing the same thing on mine but was debating between 3.8 and 4.0, moral of the story is if you want to do engine work on a 3.6 x51 go with a 3.8L over a 4.0L for reliability and longevity? and what numbers should i expect to be making from that?
Old 11-23-2020 | 08:38 PM
  #22  
TLV996c4s's Avatar
TLV996c4s
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

oh yeah it is pretty quick as is, was just looking for something different than just turboing or supercharging it because i wanted to keep it n/a
Old 11-23-2020 | 08:59 PM
  #23  
hatchetf15's Avatar
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 1,046
From: Mt Juliet, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Alpine 996 c4s
just joined today, looking at doing the same thing on mine but was debating between 3.8 and 4.0, moral of the story is if you want to do engine work on a 3.6 x51 go with a 3.8L over a 4.0L for reliability and longevity? and what numbers should i expect to be making from that?
A bump to 3.8 or 3.9 from a 3.6 generally requires no additional head work or flashing, however, if you up displacement you can take more advantage of tune and exhaust mods. A well-executed 4.0+ will use ported heads, bigger TB and exhaust exit, mapping and internal upgrades to push the curve where you want it. Bazillions of posts/threads going back over a decade on this subject. Enjoy the research!
Old 11-23-2020 | 09:20 PM
  #24  
TLV996c4s's Avatar
TLV996c4s
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

how about the R-Series from F6 innovations? heard anything good with that you've heard
Old 11-23-2020 | 09:24 PM
  #25  
Alpine 996 c4s's Avatar
Alpine 996 c4s
4th Gear
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

was about to say what the best option from F6 i know @theprf said something about that earlier
Old 11-23-2020 | 09:37 PM
  #26  
Quadcammer's Avatar
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,714
Likes: 1,451
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by theprf
Actually it's rated at 345 engine HP. At least that's what the book says.
Most people on this forum would be happy with a reliable 345HP, it seems.
Perhaps my grammar let me down there. I mean porsche and every other manufacturer rate their horsepower at the crank, not the wheels. I was not referring to the number but rather the units
Old 11-23-2020 | 09:55 PM
  #27  
hatchetf15's Avatar
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 1,046
From: Mt Juliet, TN
Default

Originally Posted by TJW996c4s
how about the R-Series from F6 innovations? heard anything good with that you've heard
If your 996 C4S is a “forever” car...sure! If not, sell it and buy a 997 turbo for the same money.
Old 11-23-2020 | 10:34 PM
  #28  
mehoff's Avatar
mehoff
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 85
From: Santa Monica, CA
Default

Over the past 7 years I’ve probably watched 30-40 m96 race-prepped engines go across the dyno (my racing club, POC, is power/weight so we’re always interested in other competitors numbers ). X51 m96’s pop 315-325 consistently. No, your motor is not making 400bhp. It’s probably around 310 w the GT3 throttle body.

Vision has built a ton of 4.0 m96/97 engines. They put down 385bhp.
Old 11-23-2020 | 11:05 PM
  #29  
wildbilly32's Avatar
wildbilly32
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 803
From: Flyover Country
Default

Originally Posted by Bash Hat
That’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works.
Old 11-23-2020 | 11:18 PM
  #30  
Alpine 996 c4s's Avatar
Alpine 996 c4s
4th Gear
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

we're all just beating a dead horse at this point lol, but F6I seems to be the best way to go to make solid power, nice touch they make the case red too


Quick Reply: 4.0l 996 with x51, is it possible?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:00 AM.