4.0l 996 with x51, is it possible?
#16
whenever it get to the dyno ill see whatever it makes and ill let everyone know but i probably have just been putting the numbers together wrong the whole time in which case thank you for correcting me, didn't mean to start a hp uproar/sorry for the ignorance per se. Pretty new actually being in the car scene so trial by fire i guess lol.
just happy to have an answer about whether or not x51 is conducive to adding a 4.0L
just happy to have an answer about whether or not x51 is conducive to adding a 4.0L
to speak to your original question, i think u will find that a .2l bump is all u want to do in a non-metz motor. Engine builders that have been doing this for years struggle to get 40-50 hp more out if a base motor. Some of this is done by using x51 build logic so im not even sure those gains r available in your motor.
i say if u have the funds go for it. Remember that the brighter the candle burns the shorter it lasts.
#17
from what i've seen, porsche did not rate m96 cars conservatively...at least those in the 996.
I'd say your car probably makes, generously, 370 crank hp (which is what porsche rates it at). When you consider your drive train losses, on a an AWD car, you'd be looking at 20% ish. So, if you do the matter, you end up around 296rwhp. I rounded to 300.
I'd say your car probably makes, generously, 370 crank hp (which is what porsche rates it at). When you consider your drive train losses, on a an AWD car, you'd be looking at 20% ish. So, if you do the matter, you end up around 296rwhp. I rounded to 300.
Most people on this forum would be happy with a reliable 345HP, it seems.
#18
so you would say just going to a 3.8L would be better than doing a 4.0L and then whatever that gets me just leave it as it is? just looking to make it a better street car with more life in it, but i also want it to last so that bit was helpful @De Jeeper 3.8L and take whatever i can get from that.
would anyone say i'm better off just buying another car at a certain point with how much money i would be putting into it, i.e. a turbo or gt3, something along those lines that come with more powerful motors to begin with?
would anyone say i'm better off just buying another car at a certain point with how much money i would be putting into it, i.e. a turbo or gt3, something along those lines that come with more powerful motors to begin with?
#19
You might try stuffing a Chevy smallblock in there if you want 600HP. I wouldn’t want a 996 engine to have anything close to that. Even the 996tt guys aren’t pushing too much beyond 480 without serious mods. But then 600+ is possible if you with that engine combination.
#20
The Flat 6 Innovations boys can up it 4.0 liters and suggest, with their supporting mods, that's worth 100 hp +/- over stock. That is probably the closest you will come to a reliable "500" HP M96.
It's simple to get 480 HP from a 3.6 Mezger powered Turbo. 550 is not unreasonable. From there, bring truckloads of money and you can have anything you want, 1200 hp is doable.
Have you driven the car with it's 345 HP? I'm pretty sure it is fast as-is.
It's simple to get 480 HP from a 3.6 Mezger powered Turbo. 550 is not unreasonable. From there, bring truckloads of money and you can have anything you want, 1200 hp is doable.
Have you driven the car with it's 345 HP? I'm pretty sure it is fast as-is.
#21
just joined today, looking at doing the same thing on mine but was debating between 3.8 and 4.0, moral of the story is if you want to do engine work on a 3.6 x51 go with a 3.8L over a 4.0L for reliability and longevity? and what numbers should i expect to be making from that?
#23
just joined today, looking at doing the same thing on mine but was debating between 3.8 and 4.0, moral of the story is if you want to do engine work on a 3.6 x51 go with a 3.8L over a 4.0L for reliability and longevity? and what numbers should i expect to be making from that?
#26
Perhaps my grammar let me down there. I mean porsche and every other manufacturer rate their horsepower at the crank, not the wheels. I was not referring to the number but rather the units
#27
#28
Over the past 7 years I’ve probably watched 30-40 m96 race-prepped engines go across the dyno (my racing club, POC, is power/weight so we’re always interested in other competitors numbers ). X51 m96’s pop 315-325 consistently. No, your motor is not making 400bhp. It’s probably around 310 w the GT3 throttle body.
Vision has built a ton of 4.0 m96/97 engines. They put down 385bhp.
Vision has built a ton of 4.0 m96/97 engines. They put down 385bhp.