Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Bore scoring not just on our 996/997/Cayenne's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2020, 05:53 AM
  #16  
Nick_L
Racer
 
Nick_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: cote du rhone
Posts: 357
Received 89 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Sad to hear. Have you modified the car anything(air filter, ECU etc)? have you done oil/filter service before the 10,000miles every time?
Do you have any clue/idea why your car have suffered from it?







Old 05-06-2020, 09:55 AM
  #17  
cdk4219
Rennlist Member
 
cdk4219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,333
Received 328 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by triggz82
I just saw as case of this the other day on p-tech's channel perusing youtube.

https://youtu.be/Cp9USm8ZwQw?t=262

Seems like this is becoming more common on macans. I was considering a second hand macan or cayenne as a daily, but I think this is enough to deter me even if it was CPO. As Jake indicated people treat these as throwaway cars.
They are all throw away cars when this happens. Junk!
Old 05-06-2020, 10:08 AM
  #18  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,788
Received 1,165 Likes on 795 Posts
Default

Junk! 🤣 Only in America...🙄 $50-$80k for a “throwaway” car... Wow! This just blows my mind. Do you think some people have more $ than brains (no knock on OP)... I just don’t get it...
The following 2 users liked this post by dporto:
Gingerman (05-06-2020), wildbilly32 (05-06-2020)
Old 05-06-2020, 10:18 AM
  #19  
Argeo
Burning Brakes
 
Argeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,115
Received 249 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Now I thought I heard here that possibly part of the reason this problem occurs besides that our cars being "Environmentally Friendly", the connecting rods are too short. Is that the case here?

I just wonder that if both are so flawed, why would Porsche keep going with it now their reputation is built on quality. They can't be that dumbed.
Old 05-06-2020, 10:23 AM
  #20  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,053
Received 807 Likes on 545 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Argeo
Now I thought I heard here that possibly part of the reason this problem occurs besides that our cars being "Environmentally Friendly", the connecting rods are too short. Is that the case here?

I just wonder that if both are so flawed, why would Porsche keep going with it now their reputation is built on quality. They can't be that dumbed.
Other brands have the scoring issue too.
Old 05-06-2020, 10:46 AM
  #21  
Argeo
Burning Brakes
 
Argeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,115
Received 249 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Yup, so is more likely just the material of the cylinders and not the shortness of the rods?
Old 05-06-2020, 11:00 AM
  #22  
wildbilly32
Drifting
 
wildbilly32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Flyover Country
Posts: 3,105
Received 786 Likes on 504 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by triggz82
I just saw as case of this the other day on p-tech's channel perusing youtube.

https://youtu.be/Cp9USm8ZwQw?t=262

Seems like this is becoming more common on macans. I was considering a second hand macan or cayenne as a daily, but I think this is enough to deter me even if it was CPO. As Jake indicated people treat these as throwaway cars.
Might just be the way the video was edited but the tech went right to the boroscope on the ticking and didn't even "think" valve train. Wonder why... Good lesson for those with ticking 996's that come here with hopes of lifter problems.
Old 05-06-2020, 11:30 AM
  #23  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,503
Received 1,122 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pszikla
Bore scoring on my Macan!Little hard to accept that a 5 year old Porsche with 76k miles developed this condition.
Porsche's initial reaction = out of warranty.
New engine is about 22000.00 installed and running and being only 5 years old there are very few in scrap yards
to find a used engine.
Owning a '99 Carrera with 126k and a Cayenne with 161k miles (yes I drive my cars!), I have to say this is a huge
disappointment to have the Macan self destruct like this.
The Lokasil liners are such crap.
I've seen this before. It's the same as Panamera and Cayenne. Any engine with Alusil bores can suffer the same fate. Long drain intervals, fuel dilution of the oil, injetors with poor spray patterns or leakage all can contribute to scoring like on the M96 engine. We've had people send us blocks blindly without contacting us and once we tell them how much it's going to cost, they just tell is to junk the block. I'm pretty sure most of them have gone home to employees to make coffee tables.

I put out a newsletter and shared it on FB and the forums about this last year:

https://conta.cc/342xq77

Long story short, use an oil with more moly in it and change it more often. There have been countless threads about LM Ceratec and there is some credence to that based on the available research. Adding Ceratec to an A40 oil will get you about 300 ppm Moly, so about the same as running Driven's DI40 or DT40.
The following 2 users liked this post by Charles Navarro:
greymda (12-21-2020), kwright997 (05-06-2020)
Old 05-06-2020, 11:46 AM
  #24  
cdk4219
Rennlist Member
 
cdk4219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,333
Received 328 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dporto
Junk! 🤣 Only in America...🙄 $50-$80k for a “throwaway” car... Wow! This just blows my mind. Do you think some people have more $ than brains (no knock on OP)... I just don’t get it...
$25,000 plus to fix a 76,000 mile car that’s probably worth $26,000, and probably will need lots of maintenance, yes Junk
Old 05-06-2020, 12:04 PM
  #25  
Argeo
Burning Brakes
 
Argeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,115
Received 249 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

What does "Long Drain intervals mean? Draining the oil out during oil changes?

Thanks Charles for the insight.
Old 05-06-2020, 12:13 PM
  #26  
pszikla
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
pszikla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 798
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Bone stock, and I have never actually driven it hard. The wife uses it as her daily to go to work and back and does not
like to speed as it scares her. So if anything the car has been gently driven since we took delivery of it.
Usual maintenance work.
As an aside, I was really surprised at around 60k miles that all the wheel bearings were shot and needed replacement.
Not a great reliability experience with this car.
Old 05-06-2020, 12:31 PM
  #27  
Argeo
Burning Brakes
 
Argeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,115
Received 249 Likes on 155 Posts
Default

Ah, long time between oil draining intervals. Not how long I am draining the oil. Me get it now.
Old 05-06-2020, 12:43 PM
  #28  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,503
Received 1,122 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Argeo
What does "Long Drain intervals mean? Draining the oil out during oil changes?

Thanks Charles for the insight.
The factory drain intervals have varied over the years, but I believe it's at 12,000 miles or one year. It really shouldn't be more than 5,000 miles or 6 months, but if the car is driven in the winter or short drives, probably should be done every 3 months or 3,000 miles tops.
Old 05-06-2020, 01:50 PM
  #29  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default Throw away?

Originally Posted by cdk4219
They are all throw away cars when this happens. Junk!
Originally Posted by dporto
Junk! 🤣 Only in America...🙄 $50-$80k for a “throwaway” car... Wow! This just blows my mind. Do you think some people have more $ than brains (no knock on OP)... I just don’t get it...
Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
No. I decided not to work with these. Too many people regard them as a throw away car if something significant happens, just like the Cayenne.
I prefer to use the word "disposable". It's an unfortunate sign of the times. My parents came out of the depression and appreciated everything they were able to purchase with their limited funds. Things like simple appliances were considered a luxury and were repaired instead of disposed and replaced. It seemed like a cultural thing to do back then; but today, most people in the U.S. throw away more than they keep.

Personally, people won't value Porsche SUVs or Crossovers, like they do the 911. The 911 represents what's left of the original Porsche DNA. Therefore, people place value in that respect alone. They won't be putting the modern Cayenne or Macan in a cooled storage unit anytime soon. These cars represent the corporate executives answer for survival. In the past, Porsche looked for ways to add power or technical innovation in their sports cars offerings, but somewhere in the last 20 years, SUVs have been the answer to keep the boat afloat. Just look at Lamborghini. You think the Urus is going to be a highly collectable car?

The Cayenne SUV or other family friendly vehicles in the Porsche lineup will suffer the same fate as others European sports car manufacturers when they past their factory warranties. And, unless they can figure out how to sell to the next generations of 911 drivers, they may lose their precious following that are willing to cough up 6 figures for these cars. The last time I looked at the analytics, the majority of 911 owners are in the range of 45 - 55.
Old 05-06-2020, 02:11 PM
  #30  
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
 
Porschetech3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Alabama USA
Posts: 6,251
Received 4,582 Likes on 2,075 Posts
Default

Macan is more V/W than Porsche, same as with Panamera and Cayenne. Ever since V/w took over Porsche those cars are heavily V/W based.

I retired from Porsche before I had gone to Macan training, but from previous training on Panamara and Cayenne, the Cayenne 6cyl was V/w as was the Panamera 3.0.... The Panamera 3.6 and V8 and Cayenne V8 were Porsche engines. But they all used Alusil cylinders. They all know nikasil is the best for cylinders, but is too expensive for high volume production therefore they all use Alusil.

V/W sells 60 times more cars than Porsche.

it's simple, high tech/high performance German engineering = high failure rate

The 996/986 saved Porsche from bankruptcy, but the new found wealth from 986/996 also was responsible for the "nail in the coffin" for Porsche as an independent carmaker. The wealth from sales of 996/986 was leveraged for loans in a plan to buy control of V/W group (over 75%) in 2005. But by 2008 (midway of the 997 model)the plan failed just short of the 75% and Porsche collapsed into the arms of V/W Group, never to an independent carmaker again.

So, everyone who has been speculating on whether the 996 will ever be collectable, I think it will definitely go down in History for being the last sports car model of the "independent Porsche Company".

Last edited by Porschetech3; 05-06-2020 at 04:04 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Porschetech3:
Gingerman (05-06-2020), TexSquirrel (05-06-2020)


Quick Reply: Bore scoring not just on our 996/997/Cayenne's



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:25 AM.