Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

1st 996 Porsche Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2019, 05:58 PM
  #1  
cltflatsix
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
cltflatsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question 1st 996 Porsche Advice

Considering purchase of 2003 996 Targa w/57k miles. No documented IMS replacement. 2nd owner had engine failure (IMS shaft broke near bearing) at 19k miles. Other than no IMS remedy, car is in close to excellent condition and well documented for that past 3 years with current owner. Blackstone oil analysis came back very positive. My question is what is reasonable discount from market value as relates to the IMS gap? Any advice/experience in former deals is appreciated.
Old 06-26-2019, 06:03 PM
  #2  
Mbren1979
Burning Brakes
 
Mbren1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Casselberry Florida
Posts: 1,100
Received 127 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Just my opinion. But i don't feel the gap should devalue the car in any way shape or form. The car isn't broke. When i purchased my car directly from a Porsche dealer i asked if they had any idea if it had been done since it was proven the car still had the original engine. The salesman responded that it had not been done but they were willing to split the cost of the repair. I did it for peace of mind.

Also to note.....depending on when the engine was swapped it may have the newest factory version of the IMS which cannot be serviced without complete engine tear down.
Old 06-26-2019, 06:07 PM
  #3  
wyovino
Rennlist Member
 
wyovino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,517
Received 610 Likes on 328 Posts
Default

Find out if the engine was rebuilt or if a Porsche replacement engine (Engine Serial number starting with AT) was installed.
Old 06-26-2019, 06:13 PM
  #4  
cltflatsix
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
cltflatsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Current owner was told that Porsche warranty engine put back in car was an "05-M97". I talked to the service department at the dealer that did the replacement in 2005 and they could only verify that the replacement was an M96 engine. My impression from talking to 2 other independent Porsche specialists is that the bearing is probably the 2nd generation M96 one. I've offered the owner his asking price, which was a little high (maybe $1500) according to my market analysis less $3500 for me to have the IMS Solution done. He's thinking about it...given that his own INDY has previously recommended that he do the replacement. We'll see...
Old 06-26-2019, 06:17 PM
  #5  
cltflatsix
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
cltflatsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

new number is #M96/03AT66566922
Old 06-26-2019, 06:23 PM
  #6  
cltflatsix
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
cltflatsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Current owner was told when he bought from another Porsche dealer in 2016 that the warranty replacement engine was an "05-M97". My followup recently with the dealership service department confirmed the replacement engine was an M96. Lease me to believe is was the 2nd generation IMSB. My offer was the sellers asking price, which was a little high (maybe $1500) based on my market analysis, less the cost of the IMS Solution ($3500). At first he said no, but he was going to consult with his INDY, who has previously recommended that the IMSB be replaced. We'll see...
Old 06-26-2019, 06:32 PM
  #7  
cds72911
Drifting
 
cds72911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: VT USA
Posts: 2,417
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

That's a replacement motor - AT in the serial number indicates austauschmotor (probably spelled wrong). What year was it replaced (do you have the invoice)? The AT engines got all updates, so it may have the updated large bearing, in which case there is no need for an aftermarket bearing. Only way to know for sure is to pull the transmission and see which IMSB it has (large nut=large bearing). But the year it was installed is a good indicator... If it is a large IMSB engine, the only way to replace the IMS bearing (or do the LN Solution) is to split the case, and even LN Engineering says that's unnecessary. Ergo, there is no "IMS gap" and you should pay fair market value.

Last edited by cds72911; 06-26-2019 at 08:03 PM.
Old 06-26-2019, 07:23 PM
  #8  
shft22
Instructor
 
shft22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: South Florida
Posts: 220
Received 46 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

My 02 had its engine replaced under warranty (05 I think) and the new engine has the large IMS bearing. As recommended I removed the bearing seal when I was doing the clutch, and it is no longer something I worry about.
Old 06-26-2019, 07:28 PM
  #9  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 805 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Here's my number and it has the non serviceable bearing.


What's the asking price of this Targa?
Old 06-26-2019, 07:34 PM
  #10  
cltflatsix
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
cltflatsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

28k
Old 06-26-2019, 07:44 PM
  #11  
cltflatsix
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
cltflatsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The engine was replaced in 2005. No invoice. Only the screen shots of service order from Porsche dealer showing engine numbers and such. Not much detail. When he bought the car 3 years ago he was convinced the engine had an “upgraded” bearing design, which has influenced his decision not to proceed with any remedy. No way to tell for sure without dropping the transmission as you said. In the event that it actually is the large unserviceable bearing for the M96 what is the consensus on longevity?
Old 06-26-2019, 07:47 PM
  #12  
cds72911
Drifting
 
cds72911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: VT USA
Posts: 2,417
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Everything I read says longevity of the larger bearing is good. People that know a lot more than me say to remove the outer oil seal if you happen to be in there, but don't make a special service to do it.
Old 06-26-2019, 07:50 PM
  #13  
Yorkwpb
AutoX
 
Yorkwpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

“Not much detail” is what you say ? Be skeptical
Old 06-26-2019, 08:21 PM
  #14  
cltflatsix
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
cltflatsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Trying hard to get to the bottom of it...being skeptical...may cost me a chance at this one, but when I get one I will know what I am getting. Or I’ll have some reserve to pay for the unknown. Thank for your comments all.
Old 06-26-2019, 08:22 PM
  #15  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,715
Received 1,580 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cds72911
Everything I read says longevity of the larger bearing is good. People that know a lot more than me say to remove the outer oil seal if you happen to be in there, but don't make a special service to do it.
That’s what I’ve heard too. Too bad someone didn’t validate or document the larger bearing way back then.


Quick Reply: 1st 996 Porsche Advice



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:13 PM.