Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Engine failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2019, 07:00 PM
  #1  
robo_porsche
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
robo_porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 166
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Engine failure

My 996 c2 2002 engine became junk last autumn during a track day. One of the connecting rods stuck to the crankshaft and totally ruined the engine. I have found a new engine but why do you believe my old engine had this failure?

My old engine seemed to work just fine before the crash and was well maintained.

Robert
Old 03-19-2019, 07:03 PM
  #2  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 805 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Sorry to hear that.
Rod failure has been an issue on these. A google search will give you some more data.
Old 03-19-2019, 07:27 PM
  #3  
AnthonyGS
Rennlist Member
 
AnthonyGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,021
Received 144 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Track use is hard on engines. At this hp / liter level lots of things are a compromise. If I had to guess I’d suspect oiling issues during track conditions to be a contributing factor.
Old 03-19-2019, 08:28 PM
  #4  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,715
Received 1,580 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

^^ what he said
Old 03-19-2019, 08:39 PM
  #5  
sb3
Instructor
 
sb3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 116
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Oiling problem most likely. If you decide to track your car with the new motor get a deep sump and possibly an Accusump too.
Old 03-19-2019, 09:56 PM
  #6  
Prelude Guy
Rennlist Member
 
Prelude Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 802
Received 124 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

It's just a poor engine design. One of the design flaws was the oiling system. It doesnt like when the car takes hard prolonged turns.
Old 03-19-2019, 11:29 PM
  #7  
lowpue
Rennlist Member
 
lowpue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,525
Received 537 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

My engine blew in long right hand high G turn because of oil starvation...common failure it seems. New 997 engine was put in with deep sump.
Old 03-19-2019, 11:38 PM
  #8  
yelcab
Three Wheelin'
 
yelcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,787
Received 637 Likes on 397 Posts
Default

That is a known weakness of a wet sump design. You want a dry sump engine, like an old aircooled version.
Old 03-20-2019, 01:47 AM
  #9  
Chris(MA)
Burning Brakes
 
Chris(MA)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 879
Received 149 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

996 is not a weapon for the track IMHO
Old 03-20-2019, 01:57 AM
  #10  
Bash Hat
Three Wheelin'
 
Bash Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,449
Received 414 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris(MA)
996 is not a weapon for the track IMHO
Agreed. Track is a whole other environment that pushes a street car beyond its intended limits.
Old 03-20-2019, 07:53 AM
  #11  
robo_porsche
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
robo_porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 166
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

My mechanic didn’t think it had anything to do with oil starvation (he is racing himself in a boxster). He thought it had something to do with overheating issues or a bearing that got damaged with debris of some kind. He said that if you race and then suddenly switch of the engine the heat can increase and make the bearings stuck. I usually cool down before I stop after a track session, but maybe not enough.

I already have a deep oil pan with x51 baffles. Unfortunately I can not really afford a turbo or a gt3, but sure they are better prepared for the track.

Any other thoughts ?

Robert
Old 03-20-2019, 10:37 AM
  #12  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

The engine has to be red hot for those bearings to stick. You would have plastic pieces on top of the engine melted to the block if that was the case. Lack of lubrication is probably what did you in. Boxters have a better engine placement so high G corners have less effect of the engine lubrication.
Old 03-20-2019, 12:11 PM
  #13  
Batteaux
Intermediate
 
Batteaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had exactly the same failure with my 2001 3.4 which was equipped with a baffled sump and an extra scavenge pump as protection against starvation. Following the engine failure at Mosport, It was sent to Jake Raby for a rebuild and after assessing the failure he attributed it not to oil starvation but to breakdown of the oil, under the high stress of track use, leading to loss of viscosity and oil pressure, immediate wear of the con rod bearing and eventual failure of the bearing and the con rod. He actually sent me a graphic detailing the stages, under track use, that lead to failure due to breakdown of the oil leading to loss of viscosity and pressure . He calls it "the snowball effect". I had been sharing the car with my son that day so it was running in two run groups and the oil presumably had the chance to get real hot. So for mine, the identified cause was not starvation but oil breakdown (Motul at the time). The propensity for such failures is why Jake specs Joe Gibbs XP9 oil for track use in his engines.
Old 03-20-2019, 01:40 PM
  #14  
Ratchet1025
Rennlist Member
 
Ratchet1025's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,129
Received 224 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Batteaux
I had exactly the same failure with my 2001 3.4 which was equipped with a baffled sump and an extra scavenge pump as protection against starvation. Following the engine failure at Mosport, It was sent to Jake Raby for a rebuild and after assessing the failure he attributed it not to oil starvation but to breakdown of the oil, under the high stress of track use, leading to loss of viscosity and oil pressure, immediate wear of the con rod bearing and eventual failure of the bearing and the con rod. He actually sent me a graphic detailing the stages, under track use, that lead to failure due to breakdown of the oil leading to loss of viscosity and pressure . He calls it "the snowball effect". I had been sharing the car with my son that day so it was running in two run groups and the oil presumably had the chance to get real hot. So for mine, the identified cause was not starvation but oil breakdown (Motul at the time). The propensity for such failures is why Jake specs Joe Gibbs XP9 oil for track use in his engines.
Thank you for sharing, this really confirms my process to change the oil after every 2 track days. Fingers crossed!
Old 03-20-2019, 02:13 PM
  #15  
Cuda911
Race Director
 
Cuda911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Oceanside/Vista (N. San Diego County), CA
Posts: 11,312
Received 441 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris(MA)
996 is not a weapon for the track IMHO
I disagree. Tons of 996's have tons of track hours with no motor failure.


Quick Reply: Engine failure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:51 PM.