Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

What years used the dual row IMSB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2018, 12:29 PM
  #1  
Jim996cab
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Jim996cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 32
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default What years used the dual row IMSB?

Happy Sunday,

Changed the oil for the first time since buying the 2000 996 cab 6-speed 2 weeks ago (low 27,000 miles.) No glitter in the oil, and none in the oil filter pleats that I cut open.

When I first bought it, I thought for certain I would immediately have the IMSB upgraded. However, the more reading I do, I’m considering not doing it till new clutch or whatever. It seems the odds of bearing failure or pretty low, especially on the dual-row models.

A fellow Rennlister tells me that mine is the dual-row version (built 11-99).

Having said that, I’m not finding search answers for my question: can someone tell me when the dual-row bearings were used?

Thank you.

-Jim
Old 09-30-2018, 01:13 PM
  #2  
wyovino
Rennlist Member
 
wyovino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,519
Received 611 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

I haven't seen any firm answers on that but I know that my build date 01/00 has a double-row. Even some 2001's have double row bearings.
Old 09-30-2018, 02:22 PM
  #3  
su8pack1
Racer
 
su8pack1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

My 2000 has a build date of 11/4/99 and never an IMSB problem at 93,000 miles. I have most, but not all paperwork going back to new and no mention of it being replaced.
Old 10-01-2018, 08:38 AM
  #4  
Barn996
Race Director
 
Barn996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Kittery, Maine
Posts: 11,801
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I believe that MY1998,1999,2000 have the double row bearing.
Old 10-01-2018, 09:34 AM
  #5  
Splitting Atoms
Burning Brakes
 
Splitting Atoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Clemson, South Carolina
Posts: 842
Received 70 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

The experts that have posted on this site have stated that the MY1999 are all dual row (assuming they have their original engines). The MY2000 and 2001 are a mix. It appears that many of the earlier MY2000 are dual row. If I had a 2000 or 2001, I would look at the IMS cover bolt at the first opportunity (clutch replacement, RMS leak, etc) to see what I had.
Old 10-01-2018, 09:34 AM
  #6  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,784
Received 1,154 Likes on 791 Posts
Default

There's a good chance it's a dual row bearing. That being said, there are no hard and fast rules. My '99 has a replacement/swapped engine in it from 2000 (M96-04) and it is indeed a dual row... No longer though because I installed "The Solution" (dual row version) a little over a year ago.
Old 10-01-2018, 03:00 PM
  #7  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 806 Likes on 544 Posts
Default

If your oil was not changed annually, there could be some etching caused by stale oil. Do you have all the service history? I'd install the Solution and never give it another thought...There are many other "modes of failure" you can then focus on.
Old 10-01-2018, 07:41 PM
  #8  
sparks259
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
sparks259's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vero Beach, Fl.
Posts: 1,484
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

My 2000 C2 has a 03/00 build date. Whaddya think? Single/double? Btw-65k mi.
TIA
Old 10-03-2018, 05:40 PM
  #9  
peterp
Three Wheelin'
 
peterp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ/NY area
Posts: 1,966
Received 662 Likes on 406 Posts
Default

My 2000 996 (production date 6/1/2000) has dual row IMS.
Old 10-03-2018, 07:29 PM
  #10  
sparks259
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
sparks259's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vero Beach, Fl.
Posts: 1,484
Received 84 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Looks like I am safe. Whew!
Old 10-04-2018, 12:08 AM
  #11  
wyo
Racer
 
wyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

my 2000 C2 has the duel row - I think that not having a duel row bearing in an MK1 3.4 car is rare - all of the 1999, 2000 and 2001 were not included in the class action based on Porsches records that they used the duel row in all of these cars, but as many of you know there are examples of MK1 cars being torn down and revealing that they have a single row bearing.
It has also been said that they changed to the single in mid year of the 2001 model but who really knows
Old 10-04-2018, 01:22 AM
  #12  
Stephen Tinker
Racer
 
Stephen Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 362
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I guess it comes down to when the engine was built, not when the chassis / power train was assembled (ie build date), as to assess if you have a double or single row bearing. Manufacturers usually have crate loads of built motors sitting on palettes waiting to be co-joined to their chassis.
My old Boxster S was assembled in January 2001 but still had a double row bearing when I replaced it back in 2010, so the engine was assembled quite some time before final installation into the chassis.
Old 10-04-2018, 10:25 AM
  #13  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wyo
my 2000 C2 has the duel row - I think that not having a duel row bearing in an MK1 3.4 car is rare - all of the 1999, 2000 and 2001 were not included in the class action based on Porsches records that they used the duel row in all of these cars, but as many of you know there are examples of MK1 cars being torn down and revealing that they have a single row bearing.
It has also been said that they changed to the single in mid year of the 2001 model but who really knows
According to PCA, Jake Raby, and LN, the dual row bearing was phased out in model year 2000. If you watch any of the PCA videos with Jake, he makes a very valid point that although the dual row bearing is the most durable of the three designs, it produces twice the wear material that will contaminate the engine when it goes bad. Also, he also mentions that you can't buy any car, whether it be a 1999 or 2000 car and assume it's going to have the original dual row bearing. It's highly likely one of the owners swapped out the bearing giving you a false sense of security.
Old 10-04-2018, 10:27 AM
  #14  
NuttyProfessor
Three Wheelin'
 
NuttyProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,968
Received 218 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stephen Tinker
I guess it comes down to when the engine was built, not when the chassis / power train was assembled (ie build date), as to assess if you have a double or single row bearing. Manufacturers usually have crate loads of built motors sitting on palettes waiting to be co-joined to their chassis.
My old Boxster S was assembled in January 2001 but still had a double row bearing when I replaced it back in 2010, so the engine was assembled quite some time before final installation into the chassis.
You make an excellent point! The engine could have been assembled at a much earlier dated than the entire car was manufactured. That's probably why a small hand full of 2001 cars have shown to have the dual row bearing.
Old 10-04-2018, 11:14 AM
  #15  
peterp
Three Wheelin'
 
peterp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ/NY area
Posts: 1,966
Received 662 Likes on 406 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stephen Tinker
I guess it comes down to when the engine was built, not when the chassis / power train was assembled (ie build date), as to assess if you have a double or single row bearing. Manufacturers usually have crate loads of built motors sitting on palettes waiting to be co-joined to their chassis.
I'm not at all sure this is accurate (my own car seems to be a violation of what's stated), but according to this post -> https://rennlist.com/forums/997-foru...ml#post7944762

996 had Double Row for engine numbers up to 661 14164
996 have Single Row from engine number 661 14165 onward



Originally Posted by Stephen Tinker
My old Boxster S was assembled in January 2001 but still had a double row bearing when I replaced it back in 2010, so the engine was assembled quite some time before final installation into the chassis.
Boxster: Double Row: up to 651 12851 (M96.22)
Boxster: Single Row: from 651 12852 onward (M96.22)

Boxster: Double Row: up to 671 11237 (M96.21)
Boxster: Single Row: from 671 11238 onward (M96.21)


Quick Reply: What years used the dual row IMSB?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:41 PM.