996 IMS retro fit make the motors safe?
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looking at picking up a 996, read that there is a IMS retro fit that will solve the grenade potential on the motor? They are just priced so low I figure just add $1500-$2k for the ims change. Correct?
Last edited by titan7; 01-01-2018 at 03:02 PM.
#2
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lots of online discussion of this subject - on this forum and many others.
There's a pretty general consensus that the IMS Solution from LN Engineering is a permanent fix. The cost of just the parts can reach $1500, and the labor will typically be more. It more or less requires that the engine be removed, which is time-consuming (and thus expensive) but allows other jobs to be done at the same time (e.g. RMS, AOS, clutch).
The IMS Solution is by no means the only choice - Googling will reveal plenty of others, with varying reviews. None is quick and easy to install.
There's a pretty general consensus that the IMS Solution from LN Engineering is a permanent fix. The cost of just the parts can reach $1500, and the labor will typically be more. It more or less requires that the engine be removed, which is time-consuming (and thus expensive) but allows other jobs to be done at the same time (e.g. RMS, AOS, clutch).
The IMS Solution is by no means the only choice - Googling will reveal plenty of others, with varying reviews. None is quick and easy to install.
#3
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: NH White Mountains
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow....big and complex question. Do your homework on this site. Also go to the PCA website for the video on IMS done with Jake of flat 6 innovations. Jake is the expert. Also go to flat6innovations.com site. Jake is a sponsor and has a ton of info on his site.
Prior to picking up my 2001 C4 I had the 6/75,000 Pro bearing from LN Engineering installed. Cost was $1750 total but I added a new clutch and RMS so paid just over $2300. The smart solution long term use is "the solution" from LN Engineering.
And I am crazy about my 996.
Prior to picking up my 2001 C4 I had the 6/75,000 Pro bearing from LN Engineering installed. Cost was $1750 total but I added a new clutch and RMS so paid just over $2300. The smart solution long term use is "the solution" from LN Engineering.
And I am crazy about my 996.
#4
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Makes the motor safer, possibly. Safer in it will be less likely to suffer an IMSB bearing failure. The engine is only as strong as its weakest part. Upgrade the bearing and you've just brought another threat to engine longevity to the top of the list. That rod wtih a tiny inclusion in it may be at the top of the list. Or a weak link in a cam chain. Or slightly less than perfect rod bolt.
Be aware that Porsche has jumped onto the IMSB replacement bearing bandwagon. My info is Porsche offers an IMSB upgrade/kit that sells for a couple of hundred dollars. Includes a new/improved bearing and some other stuff. 'course, the transmission has to come out of the car and the flywheel be removed and the proper steps followed to remove the old bearing and install the new bearing.
Be aware that Porsche has jumped onto the IMSB replacement bearing bandwagon. My info is Porsche offers an IMSB upgrade/kit that sells for a couple of hundred dollars. Includes a new/improved bearing and some other stuff. 'course, the transmission has to come out of the car and the flywheel be removed and the proper steps followed to remove the old bearing and install the new bearing.
#5
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Makes the motor safer, possibly. Safer in it will be less likely to suffer an IMSB bearing failure. The engine is only as strong as its weakest part. Upgrade the bearing and you've just brought another threat to engine longevity to the top of the list. That rod wtih a tiny inclusion in it may be at the top of the list. Or a weak link in a cam chain. Or slightly less than perfect rod bolt.
Be aware that Porsche has jumped onto the IMSB replacement bearing bandwagon. My info is Porsche offers an IMSB upgrade/kit that sells for a couple of hundred dollars. Includes a new/improved bearing and some other stuff. 'course, the transmission has to come out of the car and the flywheel be removed and the proper steps followed to remove the old bearing and install the new bearing.
Be aware that Porsche has jumped onto the IMSB replacement bearing bandwagon. My info is Porsche offers an IMSB upgrade/kit that sells for a couple of hundred dollars. Includes a new/improved bearing and some other stuff. 'course, the transmission has to come out of the car and the flywheel be removed and the proper steps followed to remove the old bearing and install the new bearing.
#7
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The factory ims bearing replacement kit contains a sealed, silicon nitride "ceramic" 6204 series single row ball bearing. This kit would be equivalent to the LN Classic Single Row IMS Retrofit. The main difference between the Porsche single row ceramic and LN single row ceramic kit is that the Porsche one has a larger center stud, like what was used on the 06-08 bearings, but the LN kit comes with an open bearing rather than a sealed one. Otherwise, load capacities are the same. I dare say the Porsche IMS kit has a prettier flange, but otherwise, function is the same.
What I find interesting is that Porsche came to the same conclusion as we did, however about 10 years after we did, for whatever that is worth.
We hardly sell any of the Single Row Classic IMS Retrofits anymore, as the Single Row Pro has double the load capacity for the same price or the IMS Solution provides a permanent solution to the IMS problem.
What I find interesting is that Porsche came to the same conclusion as we did, however about 10 years after we did, for whatever that is worth.
We hardly sell any of the Single Row Classic IMS Retrofits anymore, as the Single Row Pro has double the load capacity for the same price or the IMS Solution provides a permanent solution to the IMS problem.
Trending Topics
#8
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
titan7 - They're really spectacular little cars. I think you'll find one to be a nice compliment to your 991. Most of us get the LN replacement bearing which is not a permanent fix as it has to be changed out on a service interval of 6 years or 75,000 miles. The IMSB is not the only issue we fret about on this forum but it is certainly the issue that most of us take preventative steps to fix. If you're budgeting I will share that I paid $3,000 at a local independent shop to have my LN bearing installed along with a new clutch. I needed my new clutch but lots of folks here change out their clutch and sometimes flywheel regardless of need as a "while I'm in there" kind of deal.
As others have said - this isn't a simple issue. But if you're just stewing on the idea of adding a great Porsche at a great price to your stable, then yeah plan on doing $5,000ish worth of work to address some issues on a tired old 16-20 year old car, IMSB retrofit included for peace of mind.
As others have said - this isn't a simple issue. But if you're just stewing on the idea of adding a great Porsche at a great price to your stable, then yeah plan on doing $5,000ish worth of work to address some issues on a tired old 16-20 year old car, IMSB retrofit included for peace of mind.
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The factory ims bearing replacement kit contains a sealed, silicon nitride "ceramic" 6204 series single row ball bearing. This kit would be equivalent to the LN Classic Single Row IMS Retrofit. The main difference between the Porsche single row ceramic and LN single row ceramic kit is that the Porsche one has a larger center stud, like what was used on the 06-08 bearings, but the LN kit comes with an open bearing rather than a sealed one. Otherwise, load capacities are the same. I dare say the Porsche IMS kit has a prettier flange, but otherwise, function is the same.
What I find interesting is that Porsche came to the same conclusion as we did, however about 10 years after we did, for whatever that is worth.
We hardly sell any of the Single Row Classic IMS Retrofits anymore, as the Single Row Pro has double the load capacity for the same price or the IMS Solution provides a permanent solution to the IMS problem.
What I find interesting is that Porsche came to the same conclusion as we did, however about 10 years after we did, for whatever that is worth.
We hardly sell any of the Single Row Classic IMS Retrofits anymore, as the Single Row Pro has double the load capacity for the same price or the IMS Solution provides a permanent solution to the IMS problem.
#10
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Obviously they missed the memo and the class action suit.
#11
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What year and mileage are we talking about? The dual row '99s have a very low rate of failure.
#12
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not sure I'd want this handled at a dealer anyway since their techs may be doing this job for the first time and figuring it out as they go; would prefer somebody who's done it dozens of times before.
#13
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The factory ims bearing replacement kit contains a sealed, silicon nitride "ceramic" 6204 series single row ball bearing. This kit would be equivalent to the LN Classic Single Row IMS Retrofit. The main difference between the Porsche single row ceramic and LN single row ceramic kit is that the Porsche one has a larger center stud, like what was used on the 06-08 bearings, but the LN kit comes with an open bearing rather than a sealed one. Otherwise, load capacities are the same. I dare say the Porsche IMS kit has a prettier flange, but otherwise, function is the same.
What I find interesting is that Porsche came to the same conclusion as we did, however about 10 years after we did, for whatever that is worth.
We hardly sell any of the Single Row Classic IMS Retrofits anymore, as the Single Row Pro has double the load capacity for the same price or the IMS Solution provides a permanent solution to the IMS problem.
What I find interesting is that Porsche came to the same conclusion as we did, however about 10 years after we did, for whatever that is worth.
We hardly sell any of the Single Row Classic IMS Retrofits anymore, as the Single Row Pro has double the load capacity for the same price or the IMS Solution provides a permanent solution to the IMS problem.
#14
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was under the impression Porsche was "done" with the IMS situation after the class action suit, but seems if someone chooses to preemptively replace their IMS with the Porsche approved upgrade, it would put them "back on the hook" again for a period of time during the warranty period.
#15
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting....This is the first I have heard of the Porsche upgrade. It didn't make a big splash when introduced. I have been retired from Porsche dealership for over 2 years now , but keep up pretty well on some things, especially IMS related since I own 3 cars with M96 engines.
I was under the impression Porsche was "done" with the IMS situation after the class action suit, but seems if someone chooses to preemptively replace their IMS with the Porsche approved upgrade, it would put them "back on the hook" again for a period of time during the warranty period.
I was under the impression Porsche was "done" with the IMS situation after the class action suit, but seems if someone chooses to preemptively replace their IMS with the Porsche approved upgrade, it would put them "back on the hook" again for a period of time during the warranty period.
I would like to point out the date of manufacture on the labels. Bearings are from 2013 and the flange is from 2014. There are a few theories floating around. The most plausible is they came up with the kit thinking that the class action suit may result in their having to replace IMS bearings through some sort of recall. The kits themselves have a date stamp of 6/30/2017, so they were not kitted and ready for sale until this year.
It is reassuring that their engineers came up with the same answer we did going with a ceramic hybrid bearing and that they still believe lubrication is not a problem since they still are including a grease seal on the bearing.
![](https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/1440x1080/7_large__15395bc57fbe5ba04411f1bf3dafaafe8a1b2692.jpg)
![](https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/1440x1080/9_large__91bdfd882e999b56ff607ac3654513883ad2070d.jpg)
![](https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/1440x1080/14_large__256b730a5b62207ade602751692e6e1399673983.jpg)
![](https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/1440x1080/16_large__14eb242d2a72d7bb2a923518da9a0d2323a8f734.jpg)