Need help with RUF wheels and spacers on 993TT
#1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just purchased a pair of RUF 18's. I am wondering what spacers I will need for these wheels and what are the best tires to run on them. I would like the widest available (fitting on the wheel correctly of course) for 18" wheels. I had 19's on thew car so I will need to purchase new.
Questions:
- What are the proper spacers used for TT's. I know these rims were only made with one offset and could be used on both narrow and wide bodies so trying to ensure I get the proper offsets for my application.
- What tires are the best bet for these wheels (18x10 and 18x8.. I believe) and what are your thoughts?
- The wheels came with spacers from the PO but I'm unsure what I will need since he was a narrow bodied car.
Thanks for the help. Please let me know if there is anything else that I may have missed as well.
Bryan
Questions:
- What are the proper spacers used for TT's. I know these rims were only made with one offset and could be used on both narrow and wide bodies so trying to ensure I get the proper offsets for my application.
- What tires are the best bet for these wheels (18x10 and 18x8.. I believe) and what are your thoughts?
- The wheels came with spacers from the PO but I'm unsure what I will need since he was a narrow bodied car.
Thanks for the help. Please let me know if there is anything else that I may have missed as well.
Bryan
#2
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Also... Car has been lowered significantly with Stromski Monoballs and coilovers so it is not stock ride height. I would say it is slightly lower than european ride height.
#3
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You will need an approx 1" thick spacer to get the proper look with a Ruf wheel. On a 10" wide wheel, you should be looking at a 285x30 or 295x30 tire. If your TT still has AWD, then you must closely match the rolling diameters of the the front and rear tires. Tire Rack has all the data you will need, and they have sales guys that know our cars and can make good recommendations. The Ruf wheels that you now have are the same widths as the wheels that came as stock on our TTs. The stock tires were: 225x40x18 and 285x30x18.
#4
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your pretty limited with an 8" front, I'm going to lean towards a 225 too.
For 10" rear, 295 is probably pushing it, factory size of 285 makes more sense. Keep in mind the width of many tires vary between manufacturers, example a Sumi 285 is much narrower vs a Michelin. Damon @ Tire Rack is a great help for this info.
The spacer size is going to be more tricky, especially with your car lowered and your visual preference. It's going to be a decent size in the 28mm range most likely.
For 10" rear, 295 is probably pushing it, factory size of 285 makes more sense. Keep in mind the width of many tires vary between manufacturers, example a Sumi 285 is much narrower vs a Michelin. Damon @ Tire Rack is a great help for this info.
The spacer size is going to be more tricky, especially with your car lowered and your visual preference. It's going to be a decent size in the 28mm range most likely.
#7
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I wish my fronts were at least 8.5" or 9"
Trending Topics
#8
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've always used rotations per mile to determine closeness from front to back. Let's say one is 770 turns per mile and the other is 810.. The difference is a % that I would try and keep as low as possible. Anything above 4% and I would start to be a little concerned of long term issues.. make sense?
Does anyone else use this approach?
Does anyone else use this approach?
#10
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've always used rotations per mile to determine closeness from front to back. Let's say one is 770 turns per mile and the other is 810.. The difference is a % that I would try and keep as low as possible. Anything above 4% and I would start to be a little concerned of long term issues.. make sense?
Does anyone else use this approach?
Does anyone else use this approach?