Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RS Cam's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2008, 12:52 PM
  #1  
Spartan
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Spartan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RS Cam's

Well I've decided not to go with the GT2 cams as it requires mechanical lifters. While I like the idea of being able to rev higher and the added value of the more aggressive cams of the GT2 I don't like the maintenance that is required with the mechanical lifters. Besides that I never rev past 7k anyway.

That being said I've had a couple of builders mention the RS cams which work with the hydrolic lifters. Has anyone here installed these in their build? I'm trying to do some research on the cam profile of the RS vs the stock turbo and will post up what i find. I'm assuming that these cams will further push the power band up (which i like). Haven't even inquired as to how hard its going to be to find a set of these in the States yet

Thanks for the input guys!
Old 08-07-2008, 02:08 PM
  #2  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

The interesting thing about cams and the 911 series engines, particularly the turbo engines are that the intake design far more influences the powerband of the engine than the camshafts. Cams will move the peak power around 500-1000rpm, but it will rarely make power above 7k unless a change to ITBs is made. This is simply an airflow statement on these engines.

Of all the off the shelf cams I've used, I like the GT2 Evo cams the best. The RS cam profile may not be the best for a turbo engine due to their design for N/A environment.
Old 08-07-2008, 02:20 PM
  #3  
ScottMellor
Drifting
 
ScottMellor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Westlake Village CA.
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 'old school' Andial conversion car has the RS cams.
Since it came that way, I cannot comment on before and after.
I can say the car is much more linear than my previous FVD 480 car. But it's a completly different animal as this one is a 3.8 twin plug and the old one is a 3.6 single plug.
Old 08-07-2008, 02:47 PM
  #4  
Spartan
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Spartan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geoffrey
The interesting thing about cams and the 911 series engines, particularly the turbo engines are that the intake design far more influences the powerband of the engine than the camshafts. Cams will move the peak power around 500-1000rpm, but it will rarely make power above 7k unless a change to ITBs is made. This is simply an airflow statement on these engines.

Of all the off the shelf cams I've used, I like the GT2 Evo cams the best. The RS cam profile may not be the best for a turbo engine due to their design for N/A environment.
Thanks for the response Geoffrey. So you think that $$ better well spent would be on the intake track? From what I recall one can convet the intake to the NA but other than that what else can be done? Thanks for your help!
Old 08-07-2008, 03:34 PM
  #5  
sfl993t4
Instructor
 
sfl993t4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run the RS cams on my car and they appear to work well. I chose them as I wanted to stick with the hydraulics.
I also considered the Schrick cams, but decided to go with Porsche stuff.
Maybe one day I'll try the GT2 Evo if I convert to mechanical.
Steve
Old 08-07-2008, 03:36 PM
  #6  
Spartan
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Spartan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sfl993t4
I run the RS cams on my car and they appear to work well. I chose them as I wanted to stick with the hydraulics.
I also considered the Schrick cams, but decided to go with Porsche stuff.
Maybe one day I'll try the GT2 Evo if I convert to mechanical.
Steve
Thanks Steve, can you shed some more light on the power increase/power band with the cams? Also did you do this mod in conjuction with other mods? Thanks!!
Old 08-07-2008, 04:09 PM
  #7  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

No, I'm not suggesting upgrading the intake to ITBs and the RS Cams should work fine. The only point I was making was that the RS cam is built for an N/A engine and you might have better performance with a turbo specific camshaft that will work with the hydraulic rockers. Since I have a custom cam ground for each application, I cannot comment much on all of the off-the-shelf aftermarket ones.

Trending Topics

Old 08-07-2008, 04:45 PM
  #8  
911/Q45
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
911/Q45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I also have the RS cams on my Andial conversion. I have had durability problems with the hydraulic lifters, as I believe others have. If you have a twin plug engine, the turbos have to come off for a plug change anyway, so valve adjustment isn't that much more work and the interval is about the same.
Old 08-07-2008, 05:52 PM
  #9  
Acropora
Burning Brakes
 
Acropora's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I run the GT2 evo cams with bigger turbos. At 3K there's some power but at 5K it's hold on! Not the best for a track car but fun on the long straights.
Old 08-07-2008, 06:00 PM
  #10  
ca993twin
Nordschleife Master
 
ca993twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Does anybody know the specs on the Ruf cams as used in the Turbo R? They seem to work great, and keep the hydraulic lifters. I trust that you won't get any info from Ruf.
Old 08-07-2008, 06:32 PM
  #11  
bb993tt
Three Wheelin'
 
bb993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Here & There
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ca993twin
Does anybody know the specs on the Ruf cams as used in the Turbo R? They seem to work great, and keep the hydraulic lifters. I trust that you won't get any info from Ruf.
I'd love to hear an informed answer to this one! I asked this and many more questions when my car was in P'hausen ... never got much of an answer to any of them. Best was a vague answer to my turbo question. Paolo (pmf) got the same and between us we came up with a guess, but ... Not saying I'm not very happy with the results, however.
Old 08-08-2008, 12:37 AM
  #12  
JJayB
Burning Brakes
 
JJayB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orange Park Acres, CA
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spartan
Well I've decided not to go with the GT2 cams as it requires mechanical lifters. While I like the idea of being able to rev higher and the added value of the more aggressive cams of the GT2 I don't like the maintenance that is required with the mechanical lifters. Besides that I never rev past 7k anyway.

That being said I've had a couple of builders mention the RS cams which work with the hydrolic lifters. Has anyone here installed these in their build? I'm trying to do some research on the cam profile of the RS vs the stock turbo and will post up what i find. I'm assuming that these cams will further push the power band up (which i like). Haven't even inquired as to how hard its going to be to find a set of these in the States yet

Thanks for the input guys!
RS cam works perfect for the street/track applications. I've run against several Ruf cars and the RS has the edge on the mid range up. I think the Ruf has a better low to medium power band. The GT2 is a race application. Ask any tech setting the lash with shims is a major pita. I wouldn't run the GT2 on the street although it does make the big power. The maintence is the reason I passed.
Old 08-08-2008, 09:12 AM
  #13  
bb993tt
Three Wheelin'
 
bb993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Here & There
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Aren't there also some California emissions problems with the mechanical lifters, Jimmy?
Old 08-08-2008, 11:35 AM
  #14  
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

The mechanical lifters won't cause any emissions problems, however, a camshaft with a more agressive profile and more overlap will show a higher unburned HC when tested.
Old 08-08-2008, 09:54 PM
  #15  
JJayB
Burning Brakes
 
JJayB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orange Park Acres, CA
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bb993tt
Aren't there also some California emissions problems with the mechanical lifters, Jimmy?
As Geoffrey said, its not the lifters, its the grind. Nevertheless the Gt2 cam doesn't pass CA emissions. The other problem is 993tt are classified as "gross polluters" due to the data base the smog huggers have developed. All those mod's when you don't pass have created a class that is scrutenized by those who's life's work is protecting citizens from the deadly 993tt.


Quick Reply: RS Cam's



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:04 PM.