Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

aerodynamic musings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2007 | 04:27 PM
  #31  
Geoffrey's Avatar
Geoffrey
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 12
From: Kingston, NY
Default

I'm surprised Jean and Geoffrey experience compressing down of the rear windows - would have thought it would be sucked out (like the sun roof that was lost - or did it cave in to the cabin)
I don't know about Jean, but I have flush mounted side windows with a sliding window, so not much air goes into the cabin.
Old 11-20-2007 | 05:06 PM
  #32  
Jean's Avatar
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,452
Likes: 179
Default

Originally Posted by Basal Skull
Is there some point where decreasing cd - sloped windscreen, loss of gutters - increase lift? I guess it is a compromise? Air flows over a longer distance over the car vs below like a air plane wing. By making the cars slipperier does it increase lift? May be the current windscreen/gutters help down force?
I'm surprised Jean and Geoffrey experience compressing down of the rear windows - would have thought it would be sucked out (like the sun roof that was lost - or did it cave in to the cabin) - longer distance traveled over the car vs below like a wing creating vacuum/lift above? Or is this just a case of me knowing a little about something but not enough to really understand phenomenon that I always get into...
Although there is in most cases a relationship between drag and downforce, it is not always the case. if you drive with the two doors open you will create huge drag but no downforce. If you increase the angle of your rear aerofoil, you will experience both drag increase and downforce increase. If you remove the undertray, you will increase drag but also lift (air coming from under the car moves upwards through the engine bay, creating upward pressure on the inside of the engine lid, hence lifting the car), whereas if you work smartly on underbody aerodynamics you will be increasing downforce but not drag.. This is one of the key F1 developments to keep the car glued to the track at high speeds because of downforce, while limiting drag to a minimum.

Longer distance over the car seems to improve drag not deteriorate it, at least this is what many of the old race cars, Manthey and Alzen use on their race cars, but also to improve stability with lateral winds, please don't ask why, but it's true

I never have the windows opened when I am driving at high speeds. The rear lexan does bend inwards at highish speeds, I have it flush mounted. My only guess is that the roof flying on MOD's car is as a result of pressure on the cabin by the wind (sideways from lateral wind and frontal from the direction of movement at speed) which expanded the air inside the cabin upwards or sth like that. Poor fitment also most likely.
Old 11-20-2007 | 05:48 PM
  #33  
Felix's Avatar
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 23
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Jean
My only guess is that the roof flying on MOD's car is as a result of pressure on the cabin by the wind (sideways from lateral wind and frontal from the direction of movement at speed) which expanded the air inside the cabin upwards or sth like that. Poor fitment also most likely.
I noticed the sunroof lifting on all 3 993tts I looked at at Vmax on 11.11, including mine. They could be pushed back into place between runs. I even joked to Mod500 that he needed to do somthing as he was clearly losing top speed. Little did I know what he was going to do!

Next Vmax I'll log cabin pressure via the DL1 to see what happens as speed increases.
Old 11-20-2007 | 06:33 PM
  #34  
bb993tt's Avatar
bb993tt
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 1
From: Here & There
Default

I was one of the three. Took a piece of advice from Alan McKee (formerly known as Weltmeister) and duct-tape closed the air intake at the back edge of the hood and also taped the leading edge of the sunroof. Don't know if that's why my sunroof didn't suffer the same fate at MOD500's but it did give some piece of mind for the rest of the day.
Old 12-15-2007 | 03:12 PM
  #35  
Felix's Avatar
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 23
From: UK
Default

I checked the air pressure inside the car today; between at rest and at 175 mph there's a drop in air pressure of about 8 millibar.

So sunroofs are getting pulled out by low pressure from outside of the car, presumably coming off the windscreen?
Old 12-15-2007 | 03:32 PM
  #36  
911/Q45's Avatar
911/Q45
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Default

Is that with the windows up or down? (Most tracks require the windows down for safety reasons)
Old 12-15-2007 | 03:41 PM
  #37  
sweanders's Avatar
sweanders
Race Director
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 2
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by 911/Q45
Is that with the windows up or down? (Most tracks require the windows down for safety reasons)
In Europe most track meet organizers require the windows to be up for safety reasons.

Open windows screw up all the aero work done.
Old 12-15-2007 | 04:06 PM
  #38  
Felix's Avatar
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 23
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by 911/Q45
Is that with the windows up or down? (Most tracks require the windows down for safety reasons)
Windows up; at 175 mph I prefer them that way!
Old 12-15-2007 | 05:10 PM
  #39  
Stummel's Avatar
Stummel
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

Phelix, care to share any performance results?

Stefan
Old 12-16-2007 | 03:04 AM
  #40  
Felix's Avatar
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 23
From: UK
Default

Hi Stefan, nothing much new to share. Vmax was 177mph; backing the wastegates off didn't result in any significant change. I'll post some graphs later. Best 60-130 to date is 9.6 seconds.
Old 12-16-2007 | 07:38 AM
  #41  
Stummel's Avatar
Stummel
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

Thanks Felix!

100-200kph is around 8.5?
Old 12-16-2007 | 08:53 AM
  #42  
Felix's Avatar
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 23
From: UK
Default

8.45!

but I must confess those numbers are from running with a light fuel load and no spare and no passenger seat (so about 50 kg lighter than normal lightest road trim)
Old 12-16-2007 | 10:43 AM
  #43  
Stummel's Avatar
Stummel
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

I am really sorry, no intention to make it look slow

What was the best 100-200kph with the rebuild stock engine?
Old 12-16-2007 | 11:04 AM
  #44  
Jussi's Avatar
Jussi
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: on the road..
Default

Originally Posted by Stummel
..What was the best 100-200kph with the rebuild stock engine?
My rebuilt "almost stock" 3.8TS's best 100-200kph time with one gear change was 5.20s
Old 12-16-2007 | 11:54 AM
  #45  
Felix's Avatar
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 23
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Stummel
I am really sorry, no intention to make it look slow

What was the best 100-200kph with the rebuild stock engine?
No worries!

Probably 10.4 seconds but with a full 90 litre tank and slowish shifts (0.6-0.7 seconds). That's with a factory 430 ECU. I now manage them in about 0.4-0.5 seconds without speed shifting or anything of that sort.


Quick Reply: aerodynamic musings



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:23 AM.