Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2WD conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2007, 12:20 PM
  #31  
993inNC
Race Car
 
993inNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 4,883
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

It may work for an AX, but for track use, I have decided that I would rather not depend on something as infallible as a viscous style awd system to save my butt at close to 100 mph (in some corners) The car handles better at high speed without the front connected, so I'm sticking with it. With a track alignment, you'll want the extra speed from loss of weight vs. the front wheels turning. Plus the less weight, the less to stop, the deaper the corners can be taken....etc. I guess it come down to the use of the car. Where you are, you need the awd. Where I am, I don't and its not worth having for the track so.......
Old 08-29-2007, 07:05 PM
  #32  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,696
Received 5,229 Likes on 1,858 Posts
Default

Now that makes a little more sense. I'm still undecided but the input certainly helps to make an informed decision. It's a similar situation with wheels and tires. Going as wide as I have is great for AX but won't work as well at the track, I'm sure.
Old 08-29-2007, 08:32 PM
  #33  
993inNC
Race Car
 
993inNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 4,883
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

not necessarily (that last comment). Its all about weight and "track" front to rear. When I ran my VW's at the track (water pumpers not air) they tend to have a slightly narrower track rear than front. The more you brought that difference together, the better they handle.
The AWD in these cars I believe, was intended for lower speed inclement weather applications along with the ABD system, not haulin' *** at a track and loosing it at over 100 mph in a corner. The reaction time is to slow for the system to save you. The only issues I've seen with my car, is the ABD kicking in with to much rear wheel spin.....it still works on all 4 wheels. Not sure what the effects would be of disconnecting it or whether or not it would screw up the ABS.
Old 08-29-2007, 09:52 PM
  #34  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,696
Received 5,229 Likes on 1,858 Posts
Default

Interesting. I wonder how much changing my track has to do with how the car handles. My wheels are custom offsets and the track is definately different from stock...wider in the front, making it more even with the rear.
Old 08-29-2007, 10:22 PM
  #35  
993inNC
Race Car
 
993inNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 4,883
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

should be better!
Old 08-30-2007, 02:07 AM
  #36  
mkhn
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
mkhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 441
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In light of "only" getting 85lbs back, what is the gain back in terms of parasitic losses in the drive train by dumping the fwd?
Old 08-30-2007, 02:16 AM
  #37  
jmayzurk
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jmayzurk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't have a scale, so I can't really, er, weigh in on how much lighter the car is. Nor do I have any idea what the parasitic losses might be...

What I can tell you after driving it for a few days is this: The car feels different. It feels lighter, the steering is better, and whether it's psychological or not, the car feels faster to me, even on the street.

It does spin the tires more readily in second gear now...not so much so that I would call it a "handful," but it is definitely more lively. Good! It's a sports car. It feels like a 911 should in my opinion. If I wanted a 4WD Porsche SUV I would have a Cayenne.
Old 08-30-2007, 02:54 AM
  #38  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,451
Received 176 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mkhn
In light of "only" getting 85lbs back, what is the gain back in terms of parasitic losses in the drive train by dumping the fwd?
TB993TT lost about 0.5 seconds when he moved back to 4WD from 2WD, over approximately a 7second timed 60-130mph run. About 7% including weight savings.
Old 08-31-2007, 01:28 AM
  #39  
JJayB
Burning Brakes
 
JJayB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orange Park Acres, CA
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I keep asking myself why would the best engineering company in the world (Porsche not GM) develop an all wheel drive for their high horsepower cars.

Multipile- choice answers below:

A) To avoid paying lawsuits when the *** end hits the wall first
B) So internet mechanics can remove the heavy drive system so the *** end hits the wall first.
C) So internet driver can dilude themself that the handling is crisper when the *** end hits the wall first.
D) So Viperbob can become filthy rich selling 2 wheel drive conversions.
E) All of the above.

Answers will be posted later to keep TB, Jean & Brad from cheating.

Jimmy
Old 08-31-2007, 02:01 AM
  #40  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,451
Received 176 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Excellent post JJayB!

All of the above!

Last edited by Jean; 08-31-2007 at 02:27 AM.
Old 08-31-2007, 12:32 PM
  #41  
AndyT
Three Wheelin'
 
AndyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

JJayB have you ever had a 2wd P-car ? I had a 930 prior to my TT. The rear end control is not difficult to master. It's actually fun : )
Old 08-31-2007, 12:50 PM
  #42  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,446
Received 115 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyT
The rear end control is not difficult to master. It's actually fun : )
On a smooth track perhaps, but with turbocharged 700+NM on uneven roads with crappy weather a bucking rear end trying to whip round at 90mph became a little too much "fun" for me
Old 08-31-2007, 12:51 PM
  #43  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,451
Received 176 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyT
The rear end control is not difficult to master. It's actually fun : )
I agree...just before the *** end hits the wall first.

Old 08-31-2007, 07:16 PM
  #44  
JJayB
Burning Brakes
 
JJayB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orange Park Acres, CA
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AndyT
JJayB have you ever had a 2wd P-car ?

Yes, as a mater of fact I've owned six tail waggers and one 951 Club Sport which I raced for 9 years. And the relevence of that is.....?

I had a 930 prior to my TT. The rear end control is not difficult to master. It's actually fun : )
Humm.. pretty hard to argue fun. How about the reported 25% of the 996 GT2's that have crashed. Guess, they had a little more difficulty mastering the rear end control. As a matter of fact I know two GT2 drivers who were having fun before the *** end hit the wall. BTW, they were experieced club drivers. I'm sure they will appreciate me not posting their names.

Why even TB, has come back to the fold understanding the importance of all wheel drive with 700 NM of torque. Guess I don't have to eat humble pie after all.

For those who have been waiting for the correct answer
Jean got it right its E. ALL the above.
Old 09-01-2007, 06:27 PM
  #45  
911/Q45
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
911/Q45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would love to see you and Stuka on the 996GT board go at it Jim!


Quick Reply: 2WD conversion



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:34 PM.