Ok here it goes UMW stage 2 break in is over
06-26-2007, 06:01 PM
#16
Nordschleife Master
Brad,
Holy crap... you've got the HP to go 132 mph in the qtr and you need MORE? Its a sickness. Try uping the dose of lithium. Actually, considering your HP and your great top speed, the ET fairly sucks. Are you taking it easy on launch to save the hardware or is the car having serious traction problems? Would adding the weight but better traction for the AWD slow you down or speed you up... et wise?
Holy crap... you've got the HP to go 132 mph in the qtr and you need MORE? Its a sickness. Try uping the dose of lithium. Actually, considering your HP and your great top speed, the ET fairly sucks. Are you taking it easy on launch to save the hardware or is the car having serious traction problems? Would adding the weight but better traction for the AWD slow you down or speed you up... et wise?
06-26-2007, 09:57 PM
#17
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
what a great thread i started these are my favorites to do a comparison since i only do street driving and rarely go above 110 or 120 i believe the new setup is much superior, iwas looking for the low wend kick but it seems never to go away, i can say i like thsi setup better, although the fvd setup was not bad at all, my sotry went to hell when i made the error of sending my ecu to EVO to tune, but my mistake
07-02-2007, 07:17 PM
#18
Rennlist Member
sfbanchs,
How does the response compare with a stock TT? When do you see max (0.8 BAR) boost when in third gear? Once I clear the issues I'm having with my car, I'll most likely go with the UMW Stg.2 kit. Thanks,
Enrique
How does the response compare with a stock TT? When do you see max (0.8 BAR) boost when in third gear? Once I clear the issues I'm having with my car, I'll most likely go with the UMW Stg.2 kit. Thanks,
Enrique
