RS Tuning tuned tt911 article
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,465
Likes: 129
From: UK
Actually the car I referred tested on the other site
http://www.einszweidrei.de/
Is not the one above, the acceleration numbers are different - the one above is faster 100-300 in 22.2 compared to 19.8 above
http://www.einszweidrei.de/
Is not the one above, the acceleration numbers are different - the one above is faster 100-300 in 22.2 compared to 19.8 above
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,465
Likes: 129
From: UK
Originally Posted by Woodster
Holy S**t:
RS TUNING RUF CTR2 (like LAT has)
PS: 533 520
100-200 K 6.6 seconds 8.0 seconds
vmax 340 k (210 mph!) 330 k (205 mph)
wt 1492 kg 1422 kg
Very cool stuff indeed !
Marty K
RS TUNING RUF CTR2 (like LAT has)
PS: 533 520
100-200 K 6.6 seconds 8.0 seconds
vmax 340 k (210 mph!) 330 k (205 mph)
wt 1492 kg 1422 kg
Very cool stuff indeed !
Marty K
You don't know how close to the bone you are there
Both these cars were out at the same time (the red car above actually did 100-200 in 6.4s and 0-300kph in 23.5s) and Sport Auto wanted to do a back to back but guess who backed out
I still find the RS numbers too quick for the power/torque and weight, as GuyR has said before, it looks like it could be a doctored car although RS have said not, blaming the torque curve and the gearbox
Drifting
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
From: WEST SIDE OF MPLS, MN
I agree, that the numbers on the RS car just do not add up, Sorry TB, RS may have thrown
us a curve ball there. I would love to hear what Alois has to say about this "comparo",
I may ask have to ask him myself in the spring!!
Cool article though!
MK
us a curve ball there. I would love to hear what Alois has to say about this "comparo",
I may ask have to ask him myself in the spring!!
Cool article though!
MK
Thread Starter
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,465
Likes: 129
From: UK
Originally Posted by Woodster
I agree, that the numbers on the RS car just do not add up, Sorry TB, RS may have thrown
us a curve ball there. I would love to hear what Alois has to say about this "comparo",
I may ask have to ask him myself in the spring!!
Cool article though!
MK
us a curve ball there. I would love to hear what Alois has to say about this "comparo",
I may ask have to ask him myself in the spring!!
Cool article though!
MK
The car tested by Sport Auto on the site http://www.einszweidrei.de/ in '97 I think is the same black car, the narrative in the text on this site says it is based on a 993 C4 and has GT2 rear spoiler and the sloped widscreen - Sport Auto tested it at 80-180kph in 5.7s and the 0-300kph in 25.9s
Compare the red cars 0-300kph of 23.5s - remember the black car has the bigger spoilers and the 6 speed box which may account for the ~2.5s deficit.
The pics of the black car on the RS site do appear to show a C4S motor (the fan) and a stock 993tt intercooler - so the power and torque MUST be around the levels quoted as it will be limited by the intercooler.
I'll put the magnifying glass away now
