Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Engine rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 04:10 AM
  #1  
cluskera's Avatar
cluskera
Thread Starter
Instructor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 170
Likes: 2
Default Engine rebuild

Hi, I've successfully done a rebuild on an 83 SC motor. How different and more challenging would be rebuilding a 993 Turbo motor?

apologies for the very broad question.

​​​​​​​Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
Quadcammer's Avatar
Quadcammer
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,860
Likes: 1,627
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Very similar
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
Holytin's Avatar
Holytin
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 609
Likes: 30
From: The Blue Ridge Mountains
Default

Never rebuild a 911 engine myself but I venture to say that there are generations between a 83 SC and 993 turbo engine...
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2016 | 11:20 PM
  #4  
Ed Hughes's Avatar
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 16,556
Likes: 94
From: Bend, OR
Default

Originally Posted by Holytin
Never rebuild a 911 engine myself but I venture to say that there are generations between a 83 SC and 993 turbo engine...
Not so much inside the motor.

I say if the OP did an SC 3.0, then he's got the skills to do the 993.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2016 | 11:15 PM
  #5  
nine9six's Avatar
nine9six
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 31
From: Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
Not so much inside the motor.

I say if the OP did an SC 3.0, then he's got the skills to do the 993.
Yep, two to be exact; plus some turbine related forced air induction.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 08:12 PM
  #6  
earossi's Avatar
earossi
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 12
From: Chicago, Il
Default

The actual "core engine" is very similar to the earlier 911 engines. Its the accessories that are different. So, the camshaft drive for the power steering pump comes to mind.

I rebuilt my 3.6 last year, and used the Pelican book on rebuilding 911 engines for most everything. What does differ is the chain tensioners. Easier on the 993. Also, the cams do not use sprockets for adjustment. So, to set the timing on the cams, you either need to beg, borrow, or steal a set of the alignment tools. Or, buy them for about $1200. Or, do what I did, and "back date" the cams to the old configuration that uses a sprocket to lock in the setting. Do that, and your cams will be timed exactly how you did the 911 motor you previously rebuilt. To backdate, your cams have to have the Woodruff key slot on the front of the cam to take the sprocket. If your cams do not have that keyway, then it is really inexpensive to have a machine shop cut them into your cams.

Lastly, the 993 uses hydraulic valve lifters, so you do not need to adjust the valves. Just prelube the lifters and install. No adjustment required. However, having said that, if you elect to back date your cam timing mechanics, you will have to temporarily install a standard inlet rocker arm on the #1 and #4 cylinders so that you can set the clearance required to set cam timing which is 1.0 mm. Once you have set your cam timing, simply replace the rocker with the hydraulic equivalent. You can pick up all the pieces needed to backdate the valve timing for about $100 and then use your dial indicator setup used to time your early 911 motor.

Bottom line. If you did an earlier 911 motor, you can do a 993 3.6. There are just a few more steps.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 12:51 PM
  #7  
AOW162435's Avatar
AOW162435
Seared
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,882
Likes: 488
From: Ellicott City, MD
Default

Originally Posted by earossi
The actual "core engine" is very similar to the earlier 911 engines. Its the accessories that are different. So, the camshaft drive for the power steering pump comes to mind.

I rebuilt my 3.6 last year, and used the Pelican book on rebuilding 911 engines for most everything. What does differ is the chain tensioners. Easier on the 993. Also, the cams do not use sprockets for adjustment. So, to set the timing on the cams, you either need to beg, borrow, or steal a set of the alignment tools. Or, buy them for about $1200. Or, do what I did, and "back date" the cams to the old configuration that uses a sprocket to lock in the setting. Do that, and your cams will be timed exactly how you did the 911 motor you previously rebuilt. To backdate, your cams have to have the Woodruff key slot on the front of the cam to take the sprocket. If your cams do not have that keyway, then it is really inexpensive to have a machine shop cut them into your cams.

Lastly, the 993 uses hydraulic valve lifters, so you do not need to adjust the valves. Just prelube the lifters and install. No adjustment required. However, having said that, if you elect to back date your cam timing mechanics, you will have to temporarily install a standard inlet rocker arm on the #1 and #4 cylinders so that you can set the clearance required to set cam timing which is 1.0 mm. Once you have set your cam timing, simply replace the rocker with the hydraulic equivalent. You can pick up all the pieces needed to backdate the valve timing for about $100 and then use your dial indicator setup used to time your early 911 motor.

Bottom line. If you did an earlier 911 motor, you can do a 993 3.6. There are just a few more steps.

Great response.




Andreas
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2016 | 10:54 AM
  #8  
axl911's Avatar
axl911
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 14
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Another BIG difference between the SC and 993/994 is the cylinder head bolt tightening sequence. The 3.6 engine require you to torque to a value, then turn an additional 45 or something degrees.

The 964 top end rebuild posting on PelicanParts DIY page shows this.

Overall, I would think the 993 is easier than the 911 without the timing and valve adjustment stuff. Certainly if you can rebuild your SC, you can do the 993.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 01:30 AM
  #9  
bcameron59's Avatar
bcameron59
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 98
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by AOW162435
Great response.

Andreas
+1
Very well described!
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:21 PM.