A frustrating story
#46
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Mike-- IIRC from what you wrote in March, you were at a fellow RLer's house to help with his project. IMHO, it's time for 'carma' to kick in for your good efforts helping others when this started.
Echoing our PM: fingers crossed for a 'speedy' solution, my friend
Brilliant.
Wishful thinking: they should reimburse your valuable teaching time
Echoing our PM: fingers crossed for a 'speedy' solution, my friend
Brilliant.
Wishful thinking: they should reimburse your valuable teaching time
#47
can't stand these stories. sad that today you damn near have to go nuclear to get companies to do the right/honorable thing...you broke it you fix it. WTF is difficult to comprehend about that.
#48
I've seen the car in person and the pics don't do it justice, AAA really screwed up here. IIRC AAATowmark is the company that towed the car, which is not a subcontractor for AAA but a wholly owned subsidiary. My membership just came up for renewal and I canceled it
#49
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I'm waiting to hear back from my insurance now, and I'm pursuing other avenues to voice my disapproval. We'll see how it goes.
It's been nearly 7 weeks now since I have driven my car, and repairs - if we ever get to that point - will not go quickly. I miss it!
#51
Rennlist Member
I'm not clear is AAA your regular auto insurance and towing insurance or just your towing insurance?
Thoughts:
1) The concept that a tow hook has any failure mode built into it is nuts. Why would there be a design that would release the car to roll free if towed with too much force. Complete bogus excuse here.
I can hear it in court now: "Well your honor, we felt it best to let the car go free than to damage it by towing it too forcefully."
2) Any tow hook design would be strong enough to withhold more than 1 G of force when the mass of the car is towed against its own inertia. But all bets are off when the car is tied down and force applied with a mechanical device as was done here. This is known as destructive testing.
3) As far as I know, the AAA tow operators are independent contractors who should have their own insurance
4) If AAA not your regular auto coverage, what does your auto insurance company say about this??
Thoughts:
1) The concept that a tow hook has any failure mode built into it is nuts. Why would there be a design that would release the car to roll free if towed with too much force. Complete bogus excuse here.
I can hear it in court now: "Well your honor, we felt it best to let the car go free than to damage it by towing it too forcefully."
2) Any tow hook design would be strong enough to withhold more than 1 G of force when the mass of the car is towed against its own inertia. But all bets are off when the car is tied down and force applied with a mechanical device as was done here. This is known as destructive testing.
3) As far as I know, the AAA tow operators are independent contractors who should have their own insurance
4) If AAA not your regular auto coverage, what does your auto insurance company say about this??