Kinematic toe adjustment
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
13 Posts
Kinematic toe adjustment
With all new rear adjustable control arms, can the kinematic toe be done without the motorsports tool that hangs on the calipers? Had one attempt at an alignment and I'm sure they didn't get it. I'm a ways away from the shops that have expertise with 993's and trying to develope options.
Thanks in advance for any help
Richard
Thanks in advance for any help
Richard
#2
RL Technical Advisor
You need that factory (or the Autometric version) tool to accurately measure KT.
No other way to get this right without protractors and the ability to calibrate them.
No other way to get this right without protractors and the ability to calibrate them.
#3
Race Car
I too am in the same position (Porsche hell with no one around for hours worth a damn!). Kin is "bump steer", work the rear suspension while aligning and look for positive (or negative) toe while under load. It can be done, and may not be absolutely perfect, but..........
I tracked my 993 like that and did just fine. The guy that did my alignment is no where to be found these days so I can't answer what exactly he did......
I tracked my 993 like that and did just fine. The guy that did my alignment is no where to be found these days so I can't answer what exactly he did......
#7
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Pick two of those, getting all three might be tough.
Dave Graff at Borelli Motor Sports in San Jose is great and they are pretty accommodating. I think I paid around $300 which is about the going rate in the bay area.
Dave Graff at Borelli Motor Sports in San Jose is great and they are pretty accommodating. I think I paid around $300 which is about the going rate in the bay area.
Trending Topics
#9
Rennlist Member
#10
RL Technical Advisor
I too am in the same position (Porsche hell with no one around for hours worth a damn!). Kin is "bump steer", work the rear suspension while aligning and look for positive (or negative) toe while under load. It can be done, and may not be absolutely perfect, but..........
I tracked my 993 like that and did just fine. The guy that did my alignment is no where to be found these days so I can't answer what exactly he did......
I tracked my 993 like that and did just fine. The guy that did my alignment is no where to be found these days so I can't answer what exactly he did......
#12
Rennlist Member
If you had all monoballs in the rear (e.g. no kinematic effect due to no deflecting rubber), than would you still need to set K-toe using the tool? Why could you not just set a reasonable caster value using a laser alignment machine? Does the multilink suspension travel under load in such a way that static caster is not a good indicator of the dynamic behavior of the suspension?
If not, why not just use the tool a single time and note what the actual caster value is when using the tool to set the proper measurment, and then any time you have to do an alignment, just use your previously noted caster value and you'll never need the tool again.
Does this sound crazy? Just food for though
If not, why not just use the tool a single time and note what the actual caster value is when using the tool to set the proper measurment, and then any time you have to do an alignment, just use your previously noted caster value and you'll never need the tool again.
Does this sound crazy? Just food for though
#13
You go in order
1) ride height & corner balance all around
2)Rear axle first a) toe link 2 eccentric A b)camber link3 eccentric B 3)Kinematic bump toe link 4 eccentric C
3) front axle toe, camber , caster
for track use I'd recommend using turnbuckle links rather that the eccentrics
#14
If you had all monoballs in the rear (e.g. no kinematic effect due to no deflecting rubber), than would you still need to set K-toe using the tool? Why could you not just set a reasonable caster value using a laser alignment machine? Does the multilink suspension travel under load in such a way that static caster is not a good indicator of the dynamic behavior of the suspension?
If not, why not just use the tool a single time and note what the actual caster value is when using the tool to set the proper measurment, and then any time you have to do an alignment, just use your previously noted caster value and you'll never need the tool again.
Does this sound crazy? Just food for though
If not, why not just use the tool a single time and note what the actual caster value is when using the tool to set the proper measurment, and then any time you have to do an alignment, just use your previously noted caster value and you'll never need the tool again.
Does this sound crazy? Just food for though
#15
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
13 Posts
If you had all monoballs in the rear (e.g. no kinematic effect due to no deflecting rubber), than would you still need to set K-toe using the tool? Why could you not just set a reasonable caster value using a laser alignment machine? Does the multilink suspension travel under load in such a way that static caster is not a good indicator of the dynamic behavior of the suspension?
If not, why not just use the tool a single time and note what the actual caster value is when using the tool to set the proper measurment, and then any time you have to do an alignment, just use your previously noted caster value and you'll never need the tool again.
Does this sound crazy? Just food for though
If not, why not just use the tool a single time and note what the actual caster value is when using the tool to set the proper measurment, and then any time you have to do an alignment, just use your previously noted caster value and you'll never need the tool again.
Does this sound crazy? Just food for though