Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

First 350Z drive impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2003, 09:25 PM
  #1  
adsc4s
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
adsc4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default First 350Z drive impressions

A buddy of mine just got the new Z. He has several mods including lowered suspension and monster 20" wheels with 245 front and 275 rears. With the mods, cars looks better than other Z's I have seen. Seeing as the HP and torque numbers are close to my 993, I was excited about the opportunity to test drive it.

Interior felt more cockpit like than the 993. However, the gauges were more confusing and the whole interior was too busy. The throws on the shifter felt short but I was not sure whether I was in gear or not. Car handled great but I was very cautious looking for any road imperfections with those 20" wheels. Lastly, I was hugely disappointed with the acceleration! I was expecting the same seat of the pants sensation as my 993 but it did not feel nearly as quick. Could be the much larger diameter wheels, but there just wasn't anything there.

Overall, a great car for the money and without having driven a 993 prior, it would probably impress most. However, I have driven a 993 prior. Porsche, there really is no substitute.
Old 07-20-2003, 04:53 AM
  #2  
Memphomaniac
AutoX
 
Memphomaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Couldn't agree more............
Old 07-20-2003, 12:07 PM
  #3  
RT7
Burning Brakes
 
RT7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Riverside/San Diego, CA
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmmm... I took one for a spin on a short course auto-x at the BF Goodrich event in California Speedway and I was surprised by the amont of power and acceleration and it was an automatic too. I guess it all depends on each individual's expectation. Of course, no comparison to our 993.
Old 07-20-2003, 12:58 PM
  #4  
24FPS
Drifting
 
24FPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: la la land | comin' back soon nyc
Posts: 3,351
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Question isn't it just a new body on a maxima???

seems like i read somewhere early on that the car would be a let down to "z" enthusiast... as it was not a real new car. so------------> i'm not surprised.

you get what you pay for. i'd do a used 911 anyday over a nissan.

!!!!
Old 07-20-2003, 01:08 PM
  #5  
nota_troll
Rennlist Member
 
nota_troll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,114
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

For the record I like 350Zs. It is a neat looking car but still a bit pricey for me. If it were my money I'd be buying the Mitsubishi Evolution ALL day long.

24FPS - I almost bought a 2001 BMW M Coupe (http://www.368s.com) before 993. Boy am I glad I didn't (even though I LOVE those cars)
Old 07-20-2003, 03:31 PM
  #6  
Michael-Dallas
Pro
 
Michael-Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 600
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Re: isn't it just a new body on a maxima???

Originally posted by 24FPS
seems like i read somewhere early on that the car would be a let down to "z" enthusiast... as it was not a real new car. so------------> i'm not surprised.
The 350z, G35 sedan/coupe, and FX are built on Nissan's RWD platform (that's shortened and more reinforced). The Altima, Maxima, and Murano are built on Nissan's FWD platform.

I was impressed w/ the 350z enough to sell my modified 300ZX twin turbo for one. The factory understeer is too much for the open track, but the NISMO S-Tune suspension (sway bars, springs/struts) fixes that.

All the Porsche guys that have driven mine on the open track are impressed w/ it, but, yes, it's no 911.

Michael.
Old 07-20-2003, 08:48 PM
  #7  
Cupcar
Rennlist Member
 
Cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California Boardwalk, Skanderborg Denmark
Posts: 3,693
Received 100 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I just bought a 350Z Enthusiast and paid, after negotiation, $30,379.71 as they say: "out the door" with all taxes and license fees. My Z has Xenon lights, and a limited slip differential and traction control plus a lot of other bells and whistles not on the "Base" model. About $2000 less than I paid would have gotten me the "Base" model another $5000 would have gotten me the "Track" model with Brembo brakes, 18" forged alloy wheels with performance tires and a stability management system. The Z is faster than a Boxster but not quite as quick as a Boxster S, for around $25,000 less than an S. I think the Z's acceleration is a little less than the advertised 287 HP would deliver in a car of this weight but otherwise the thing is nearly perfect. The air conditioning is the best of any car I have ever owned and better than my new Mercedes.

The design of the Z is amazing for the money. It has an aluminum hood, a carbon fiber drive shaft and the suspension is a true independent with upper and lower control arms in the front and a multilink arrangement in the rear. The suspension is composed of forged aluminum links and uprights save for 2 links made of tubular steel in the rear. The stabilizer bars are tubular. The engine is an all aluminum OHC 60 degree V6 with variable cam timing, 4 valves per cylinder. The trans is a 6 speed aluminum unit.

I bought the the Z for my daily driver as my Porsche Cup has evolved to the point where such things as it's aluminum hood and many of it's other parts are no longer available so the car has become more of a collector piece, besides I have made changes that make it more of a track than a street car.

The Z's handling is understeer all the way but as others have noted the Nismo suspension kit will cure this. The body is tight and there are no squeaks or rattles. The gearbox shifts great on my car and the ratios are well chosen. The engine sound is great.

The Nismo (Nismo is Nissan's performance arm) performance parts catalog has a bunch of cool stuff available from the dealer for reasonable money that could transform the car, for around $10,000 I could have a lot of stuff like cams, headers, oil cooler,forged alloy wheels, different LSD, special suspension plus a Brembo upgrade etc. It looks like installing the Nismo suspension will take me about 4 hours or so, the design is so good for this. Why doesn't Porsche offer a performance parts catalog like this????


I had dinner last night with a Nissan executive who told me they are selling around 4000 Z's a month and that it is the most successful sports car ever in the USA.... Porsche has some homework to do in my opinion. I could't bring myself to pay the price for the latest hardware from Porsche with it's lackluster engine and gearbox design when I could get the Z for so much less and have more money to spend on Porsche parts, sorry Porsche.

Last edited by Cupcar; 07-20-2003 at 08:57 PM.
Old 07-20-2003, 09:01 PM
  #8  
nota_troll
Rennlist Member
 
nota_troll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,114
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Cupcar - on your new ride.
Old 07-21-2003, 05:43 AM
  #9  
Rezal
Burning Brakes
 
Rezal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

While I think the new Z is good value, I'm still a fan of the last 300ZX looks. Of course, since I used to own a Twin Turbo, I'm biased!

I fear that the Z's new edge stying would start looking old in about a year or so. The G35 Coupe has better styling, IMHO. Attempts to make the new Z look better with bodykits has only made it look worse.
Old 07-21-2003, 06:09 AM
  #10  
Chipset
Advanced
 
Chipset's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I actually like the lines of the 350Z. The problem I have with many Japanese cars, especially Nissans, is their inability to hold up well after time. Almost all cars degrade with time. However, look at a 10 year old Porsche then look at a 10 year old 300Z. The Z has a lot more problems.
Old 07-21-2003, 06:48 AM
  #11  
nota_troll
Rennlist Member
 
nota_troll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,114
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Japanese cars will never grow old gracefully. I remeber reading about the NSX and Porsche's response was it will look dated.

Even though the body hasn't changed much it still looks old.
Old 07-21-2003, 08:40 AM
  #12  
Steve 96C4S
Rennlist Member
 
Steve 96C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, MD.
Posts: 6,590
Received 864 Likes on 438 Posts
Default

Originally posted by nota_troll
Japanese cars will never grow old gracefully. I remeber reading about the NSX and Porsche's response was it will look dated.

Even though the body hasn't changed much it still looks old.
Here, here about Japanese styling (not that there's anything wrong with it - but...timeless?" - can you imagine what people are going to say about the new Maxima 5 years from now? To me, it's kind of hideous now, even though the car mags all rave about it. The front end especially is atrocious to me. I can't figure out what the heck they see in it? I loved the styling of my 90 and 96 Maximas, but the new one? I don't get it?

I have NEVER seen a Porsche I didn't like - ok, let me rephrase that, I've never seen a 911/912/356 I didn't like the styling of, even decades later when I see them on the street. When I was out yesterday revving my 993 as high as possible (under the guarded instructions of my repair shop )), when I saw a pristine bright red 356 that knocked my socks off and gave me a bit of neck strain as I followed it with my eyes. I can't imagine that happening with a 350Z 5-10 years from now, but I am very P-Car biased (like most of us are) I guess. I had a 72 240Z once in college and loved that ole thing - fugly lime green and so much rust that you could see the road under the floor mats! Fast as heck, though. That car, compared to a 72 911 - which would you prefer to stare at?

Steve
Old 07-21-2003, 08:43 AM
  #13  
User 4621
Race Director
 
User 4621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,058
Received 614 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

After taking a friend of mine to his first track day at Laguna Seca a while back, he decided he needed a new car. The cars that landed within his buying parameters were the WRX STi, Evo, and 350Z. After driving all 3, he ended up buying...the G35 Coupe. Similar setup to the 350Z Track (big Brembo's, wheels, etc), but IMO far better looking, and dealer's that treat you very well instead of like a wallet with legs.

Also, Nissan's pricing is weird, in that the G35 similarly equipped is no more expensive that the 350Z, yet has higher content and a far better interior. Go figure.
Old 07-21-2003, 08:48 AM
  #14  
nota_troll
Rennlist Member
 
nota_troll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,114
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As in my earlier post my money would be on the Evolution all day long. Car will run circles around a 350Z. Hell it's as quick as any 911.

The refinement isn't there nor the cache but it's one hell of a car.

A friend brought his RHD 22B (http://www.22b.com) to the track. I got to drive it around the track. That car is wicked!! Takes practice shifting with the left hand.
Old 07-21-2003, 08:57 AM
  #15  
User 4621
Race Director
 
User 4621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 13,058
Received 614 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

nota_troll,

Yeah, my friend was very tempted by the EVO, he also felt it probably had the best overall performance by a small margin of the 3 cars that he drove. But he was looking for more of a GT type car he would enjoy on long road trips as well as storming around Lime Creek Road. He described the EVO as feeling like a $16K econobox with $20K of mods. (which is pretty much what it is)

Sure would make a decent track car though.


Quick Reply: First 350Z drive impressions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:23 AM.