Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Rollbar and HANS not a safe combination

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2013, 05:06 PM
  #31  
nrubenstein
Instructor
 
nrubenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flying Finn
Which is it? Better have harness or not? On one hand you're saying having harness without HANS is a bad idea but then you say that cage is necessary.

Whether race car or not, if you have full cage & harness, to me it seems you're safer with them even without HANS than with regular 3-point & no cage.
(no need to argue that cage needs to be properly installed etc. as that obviously is assumed when there is a cage)


Yes, and using HANS that is not properly installed has the same untested issues.


You're talking about airbags, right?
Whether they're bad in a car that has 6-point harness & full cage I have no idea. To me it would seem it's not a bad thing but I'm not educated enough to argue about it.

However besides airbags, I don't see how a street car with full cage and 6-point harness differentiates so much from a race car with full cage and 6-point harness and in that case, I have to believe all those races with their harnesses and cages before HANS knew something when they were using those instead of 3-point & no cage.
Argh.

You are trying to conflate two entirely different things. If you think that I'm saying that people should be racing with three point belts, well, I'll just say that I don't think you are actually reading what I wrote.

There are two entirely separate issues here. The first is that you would be nuts to wear a harness on track and not wear a HANS today. The past is pretty much completely irrelevant. Without a HANS or equivalent, your neck is almost completely unprotected. In a street car that does not have a cage, the airbags and seat belts are designed to limit the damage. That's why people don't generally break their necks in crashes on the street (or on track in street cars).

The second issue is the question of what safety equipment actually makes you safer when you are running a street car on the track?

There are a couple levels to this question:
1) In a bone stock car, are you actually safer wearing a helmet? Does the interaction between the helmet and your airbags make you less safe? Is the extra weight added to your head harmful?
2) What is the minimum level of safety equipment necessary to actually make you safer? I said that in a relatively modern car in a DE (i.e. NOT racing!), if I couldn't use a HANS, I'd rather just wear the 3-point.

Again, let me reiterate: I am not talking about racing. When it comes to actual racing safety, I am a great believer in stepping through the FIA handbook. And, of course, the FIA handbook includes HANS.
Old 08-27-2013, 08:33 PM
  #32  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

To go back to the OP, if my car still had the DAS bar in it, I'd wear a HANS device, no question. Sorry, Juha, based on completely anecdotal observations, I see far more guardrail or tire wall impacts than rollovers. The track rollovers I have seen with 911's either with or without a rollbar have resulted in an intact driver compartment. This is based on over a decade of track experience. (Cue Ken to one up me with his thirty plus years of track work. )

When I go out on the track, even if it's "just" a DE, no matter how hot it is, I wear my suit (with cool shirt) and my HANS device. It's like buying a radar detector and zapping cross country without it because it's too inconvenient. You bought it; why not use it?
Old 08-27-2013, 09:01 PM
  #33  
Flying Finn
King of Cool
Rennlist Member

 
Flying Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Miami Beach, FL
Posts: 14,218
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nrubenstein
I said that in a relatively modern car in a DE (i.e. NOT racing!), if I couldn't use a HANS, I'd rather just wear the 3-point...
OK, I think we just have to agree to disagree. I'd rather have 6-point harness and full cage.
Old 08-27-2013, 09:11 PM
  #34  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flying Finn
OK, I think we just have to agree to disagree. I'd rather have 6-point harness and full cage.
+C6.
Old 08-28-2013, 11:52 AM
  #35  
FullThrottle64
Racer
 
FullThrottle64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 446
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nrubenstein
In a street car that does not have a cage, the airbags and seat belts are designed to limit the damage. That's why people don't generally break their necks in crashes on the street (or on track in street cars).
No. Neck injuries are quite common in street collisions; they just aren't as severe since the majority of incidents occur at far lower speeds. Yes, a three-point harness doesn't hold the shoulders to the seat the way a 5/6-point does, but that's only part of the story.

The second issue is the question of what safety equipment actually makes you safer when you are running a street car on the track?

There are a couple levels to this question:
1) In a bone stock car, are you actually safer wearing a helmet? Does the interaction between the helmet and your airbags make you less safe? Is the extra weight added to your head harmful?
2) What is the minimum level of safety equipment necessary to actually make you safer? I said that in a relatively modern car in a DE (i.e. NOT racing!), if I couldn't use a HANS, I'd rather just wear the 3-point.
Why are you leaving your airbags active on track? In general, you don't want an airbag to be active during track driving, for a variety of reasons. To my knowledge, none of the serious racing sanctions allow them. DEs may not require deactivation, but that doesn't mean that they are a good idea in that environment.

Given the number of people who swap out their seats for pure racing seats that don't have integral side airbags, I think that suggesting that people rely on the stock safety systems is a bad idea.

Let me also point out that not all HNRs work like the HANS and require a /6-point harness to be effective. There are other systems available that might be a better fit for use in a "pure" street car.
Old 08-28-2013, 04:05 PM
  #36  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark in Baltimore
To go back to the OP, if my car still had the DAS bar in it, I'd wear a HANS device, no question. Sorry, Juha, based on completely anecdotal observations, I see far more guardrail or tire wall impacts than rollovers. The track rollovers I have seen with 911's either with or without a rollbar have resulted in an intact driver compartment. This is based on over a decade of track experience. (Cue Ken to one up me with his thirty plus years of track work. )

When I go out on the track, even if it's "just" a DE, no matter how hot it is, I wear my suit (with cool shirt) and my HANS device. It's like buying a radar detector and zapping cross country without it because it's too inconvenient. You bought it; why not use it?
I was paged? Huh? Might be able to find the photos I took at the POC Tribute race about 10 years ago when Stefanowicz and Ollila got tangled going into T2 at Willow while avoiding a backmarker. THAT (Ollila 911/930/935/Whatever) was one of the most destroyed hulks that ever got hauled back to the paddock. Obvioiusly full cage, but likely pre-HANS. Intact driver compartment, no driver injury. At least to the extent he wasn't transported.

Now, contrast that with the 100% stock E36 M3 I had the (dis)pleasure of riding in when we went softly sliding off track at Thunderhill, hitting some ruts and doing a 720. A pillar crushed down in the driver's head. And I'm not sure how arms didn't fly out the windows. All this at 20 (?) MPH.

Nearly infinite number of scenarios out there; and I've seen total POS cars survive rather well, as well as pro-prepped DE cars with properly installed "lite" equipment having a poor outcome.

Ultimately, I say work with PROFESSIONALS to acheive your comfort/risk level.
Old 03-01-2014, 12:41 PM
  #37  
Juha G
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Juha G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,528
Received 62 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

How about those collapsed roofs? This 997 GT2 owner got his handed over today in Helsinki:

Old 03-01-2014, 09:50 PM
  #38  
seeq
Rennlist Member
 
seeq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

HANS vs no HANS

Old 03-02-2014, 01:59 PM
  #39  
trophy
Race Car
 
trophy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary...Under my car... :)
Posts: 3,918
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Boy does that video show the benefit of the Hans, thanks for posting.
Old 03-02-2014, 08:54 PM
  #40  
e9stibi
Drifting
 
e9stibi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hannover
Posts: 2,420
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

For me it is easy:

3 point harness -> no HANS
6 point harness -> HANS

Someone should not drive 6 pt harness without a HANS ... But this is my risk management and shared by a lot of pro coaches on my race tracks.



Quick Reply: Rollbar and HANS not a safe combination



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:17 AM.