Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Killing the P1411/P0410 codes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2013, 06:15 PM
  #1  
bruce7
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bruce7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Default Killing the P1411/P0410 codes

I previously posted about replacing the SAI check valve and then cleaning out
the SAI air passages. But yesterday, one week later after doing the port clean-out,
the CEL returned with the P1411/P0410 codes.

I looked into what I could find about the SAI system and saw that there are
2 more valves, a cut-off valve and a shut-off valve connected by a vacuum line
that I needed to inspect to see if they were functioning correctly.

The cut-off valve sits directly above the check valve under the MAF sensor.
A short distance away to the left is the shut-off valve.

When I removed the air cleaner assembly and the MAF and looked back there
with a mirror, I found that the vacuum line between the two valves was missing.

I hiked up to the local NAPA store and picked up some Goodyear vacuum hose
in 5/32 I.D. for $0.75 per foot. I only needed about 3 inches though because the
connectors are very close together. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get a good
photo back there showing the 2 barbs coming from the valves.

I also picked up a 2x3 inch inspection mirror that helped to show what was
back there. Very handy item to have.

I reset the codes and did a cold start. The pump could be heard to run for
2 minutes and then shut off.

Time will tell if this finally kills those dreaded SAI codes but I feel pretty confident
now that I've isolated the problem. Who knows how long that vacuum line
has gone missing. So all this time it never was blowing any air into the exhaust.

-bruce
Attached Images     

Last edited by bruce7; 04-14-2013 at 06:18 PM. Reason: typo
Old 04-14-2013, 09:41 PM
  #2  
eddie_993
Rennlist Member
 
eddie_993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the continued update. I'm planning on starting all of this next month on mine and your info should come in handy.
Old 04-14-2013, 11:39 PM
  #3  
JDHertz11
Race Car
 
JDHertz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miamah, La Florida
Posts: 4,694
Likes: 0
Received 67 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

It just dawned on me but I installed an air injection bypass kit on a 2005 Toyota Tundra 4.7 V8 a few months ago. They're known to have air injection problems that throws CEL's resulting in reduced power, erratic automatic transmission behavior and failed emissions (due to CEL). I wonder if something similar can be done to the 993's? I can post a link to the $100 kit that I used if anyone is interested. I'm sure it would have to be reengineered but the thought process may translate?
Old 04-14-2013, 11:45 PM
  #4  
nine9six
Banned
 
nine9six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Bruce,
Nice work, well documented. Thanks for the update and info.
Old 04-15-2013, 08:39 AM
  #5  
Garth S
Rennlist Member
 
Garth S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,210
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDHertz11
It just dawned on me but I installed an air injection bypass kit on a 2005 Toyota Tundra 4.7 V8 a few months ago. They're known to have air injection problems that throws CEL's resulting in reduced power, erratic automatic transmission behavior and failed emissions (due to CEL). I wonder if something similar can be done to the 993's? I can post a link to the $100 kit that I used if anyone is interested. I'm sure it would have to be reengineered but the thought process may translate?
Link please .... my Tundra would like to meet your Tundra ...
Old 04-15-2013, 01:13 PM
  #6  
bruce7
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bruce7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Just a thought about how that vacuum line could have gone missing.

When I replaced the check valve, I was unaware that there was a vacuum
line back there. When the rubber hose was removed from the top of the
check valve, it was pushed up a couple of inches to give room to work and
at that point it may have dislodged from the change-over valve and dropped
down into the nether regions never to be seen again. Not sure it was there
to begin with, but this scenario could have happened easily.

Still looking for a good photo of that area to confirm the positioning of the
vacuum lines. Adrian Streather's book has some photos but they don't match
my 97 and I think some changes were made over the years.

-bruce
Old 04-15-2013, 01:16 PM
  #7  
nine9six
Banned
 
nine9six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,465
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bruce7
Just a thought about how that vacuum line could have gone missing.

When I replaced the check valve, I was unaware that there was a vacuum
line back there. When the rubber hose was removed from the top of the
check valve, it was pushed up a couple of inches to give room to work and
at that point it may have dislodged from the change-over valve and dropped
down into the nether regions never to be seen again. Not sure it was there
to begin with, but this scenario could have happened easily.

Still looking for a good photo of that area to confirm the positioning of the
vacuum lines. Adrian Streather's book has some photos but they don't match
my 97 and I think some changes were made over the years.

-bruce
I like your deductive reasoning...Sounds very plausible to me.
P.S. Bruce, could you post the photos of the area you are discussing, regardless of whether they match your 97? PLEASE!
Old 04-15-2013, 01:21 PM
  #8  
JDHertz11
Race Car
 
JDHertz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miamah, La Florida
Posts: 4,694
Likes: 0
Received 67 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Garth S
Link please .... my Tundra would like to meet your Tundra ...
PM sent... no more hijack...
Old 04-15-2013, 01:26 PM
  #9  
bruce7
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bruce7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nine9six
I like your deductive reasoning...Sounds very plausible to me.
P.S. Bruce, could you post the photos of the area you are discussing, regardless of whether they match your 97? PLEASE!
The photos I was mentioning are in the book Porsche 993 : the Essential
Companion. I can get the book tomorrow and scan the pages and post.
It's a couple of pages in the book.

-bruce
Old 04-15-2013, 01:32 PM
  #10  
bruce7
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bruce7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SchnellAuto
OK here is my lame question.. why does it have to bent? the hose line..i usually forego things like that..i mean if its sucking air on that nozzle would it not be more effient not to put a hose there..

lemon
Here is something from the 996 forum on Renntech I found that explains how
it works. The 996 system is similar to the 993.

http://www.renntech.org/forums/topic...l-p0410-p1411/

-bruce
Old 04-15-2013, 01:41 PM
  #11  
bruce7
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bruce7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Default Reference picture found

The photo below is what I was looking for:

http://www.pcarworkshop.com/index.ph...101_-_0033.JPG

Looks like from this photo there is no straw connecting rubber elbows
together between the two valves. Just the single elbow connects the two
valves.

So the elbow simply popped off when I replaced the check valve most likely.

I'm going to update my previous DIY to include this note.

-bruce
Old 04-16-2013, 08:15 PM
  #12  
bruce7
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bruce7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nine9six
I like your deductive reasoning...Sounds very plausible to me.
P.S. Bruce, could you post the photos of the area you are discussing, regardless of whether they match your 97? PLEASE!
Hi, I scanned the two pages from the book and attached it as a pdf file.
In the photos you can see how the change-over valve is mounted differently
from my car. On my car a single rubber elbow connects the shut-off valve
and the change-over valve. On the car shown here, due to the distance,
2 elbows and a straw are used to make the connection.

P.S. I've update by DIY on changing the check valve and included some new
diagrams and a reference photo. See it here: https://rennlist.com/forums/993-foru...eck-valve.html

-bruce
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
Air injection.pdf (158.9 KB, 345 views)
The following users liked this post:
ARC Driver (11-27-2020)



Quick Reply: Killing the P1411/P0410 codes



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:14 AM.