Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

964 vs 993

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2013, 06:06 PM
  #1  
jotaking
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jotaking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default 964 vs 993

Hey folks,

Been looking at auto trader (not to buy, just curious) and I have noticed that the 993's really hold the money..starting at £20K up to £70k.

Although I would always default for the 964 as I do prefer the upright lights. I am developing a soft spot for the 993 and if I had the money would love one in my stable.

I know that the 993 was a leap on from the 964, however am I right in thinking that they share the same platform, engine, components etc... etc...

So my question is....What sets them so far apart on price???

No 964 bashing please....
Old 02-28-2013, 06:12 PM
  #2  
goofballdeluxe
Rennlist Member
 
goofballdeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,942
Likes: 0
Received 151 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

964s are great.

I think the 993 holds better value for a few reasons:

*Last of the air-cooled 911s.

*More power than the 964

*Better rear suspension

*More refined than the 964

*Self adjusting valve lifters on the 993 and some other improvements over the 964

There are other reasons, but those are few big objective ones.

Some also say the 993 is better looking, and I agree from the rear it does, but I think the 964 is a damn good looking Porsche and I actually prefer the upright headlamp style to the 993 at times.

They are both great models, and one would be fortunate to own either.
Old 02-28-2013, 06:15 PM
  #3  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,200
Received 562 Likes on 200 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jotaking
So my question is....What sets them so far apart on price???
Supply and demand.
Old 02-28-2013, 06:20 PM
  #4  
jotaking
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jotaking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hey Goofballdeluxe,

Just wanted to reply cause that's the best name I've ever typed!!

Agree, 993 has a great rear!
Old 02-28-2013, 06:20 PM
  #5  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,521
Received 80 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goofballdeluxe
964s are great.


Some also say the 993 is better looking, and I agree from the rear it does, but I think the 964 is a damn good looking Porsche 'and I actually prefer the upright headlamp style to the 993 at times.
This is where opinions differ. The upright lights on pre-89's and their fenders look better than the 964, IMO. Those I like. But the swept back 993 lights are sexier.
Old 02-28-2013, 06:39 PM
  #6  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

993 improved on much of what was in the 964, I'm not bashing 964s just pointing out that 993 was improved in many ways from that starting point, similarly 996 is mostly improved on 993(w/ some glaring exceptions) and 997 improved on 996

start w/ chassis - 993 is 20% stiffer and has the multi-link rear suspension, 964 base aero is slightly better mostly because of the 993s greater frontal cross section. Otherwise mostly the same but w/ some minor changes like in the HVAC system. 993 cabin is quiter because the glass was raised closer to the skin slipstream.

brakes - 993 are bigger stronger and will last longer even in base form, 993RS are some of the best ever put on any car to that time, 993 ABS is improved over 964 w/ faster cycle times, pedal ratio is improved to include linearly rising rate

transmission - 993 6 speed vs 964 5 speed, US cars are handicapped by a poor choice of gearing RoW, RS and Cup aren't, the 5 speed gearing isn't any better, 993 did get much better asymmetric 4 plate lsds, 964 had 2 platers that are difficult to update because of the case dimensions.

suspension - 993 both front and rear were resigned w/ lighter/stiffer components and tuned for a more sporting feel, wider wheels were available oe

engines - 964 250hp@6100, 31.6MKP@4800, 993272@6100, 33@5500 for non vram, 285hp@6100, 34.7MKP@5250 for vram, 300hp@6500, 346.2MKP@5500 for vram,

if you are thinking awd, 993 uses a lighter simpler much more reliable system that is at the same time sportier and can be modified as the 2wd versions can be modified
Old 02-28-2013, 06:41 PM
  #7  
Livefreeandrive
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Livefreeandrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 2,030
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Did the factory ever install basket handles on 964s?
Old 02-28-2013, 06:46 PM
  #8  
Leon993
Racer
 
Leon993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Another improvement I noticed is a protective panel by the timing belt on the 993 to prevent the belt's exposure to carbon monoxide.

What was found in the 964 was that their timing belts degraded much quicker because of this exposure.
Old 02-28-2013, 06:54 PM
  #9  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leon993
Another improvement I noticed is a protective panel by the timing belt on the 993 to prevent the belt's exposure to carbon monoxide.

What was found in the 964 was that their timing belts degraded much quicker because of this exposure.
The only timing belt I can think of is in the distributor, by the end on '93 964s had the same vent kit as is used on 993s installed. Prior to that ozone build up inside the distributor was a problem as far as belt life was concerned
Old 02-28-2013, 06:56 PM
  #10  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,521
Received 80 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leon993
Another improvement I noticed is a protective panel by the timing belt on the 993 to prevent the belt's exposure to carbon monoxide.

What was found in the 964 was that their timing belts degraded much quicker because of this exposure.
It is a vent kit, that uses the fan to remove ozone from the timing belt area on the distributor, which caused the degradation.
Old 02-28-2013, 06:57 PM
  #11  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

another thread here reminded me 993 OBD2 used on US 993 from '96 on is a potential nightmare especially in areas that require DME interogation as part of the annual inspection procedure, they seem to have gotten a handle on it for 996 up but on those year 993s I wouldn't want one
Old 02-28-2013, 07:10 PM
  #12  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,363
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Do a search - this has been discussed about a bazillion times, and I seem to remember a thread quite recently..... lots of this discussion on all the major Porsche lists as well (like Pelican).

The ODB 1 vs 2 argument always surfaces, I think the validity of that varies depending on where you live and your emissions testing area, the shape of the engine, and of course if you have ODB 1 (early 993), conversion to RS Flywheels is often problematic - so its a trade off no matter which way you go.

At the end the choice is yours - drive both, look at both and go with your gut! Simple and easy, its really a first-world problem to decide which Porsche to buy. :-)

Bill, I think you had a long thread on the differences on Pelican? - can't quite remember.

Cheers

Mike
Old 02-28-2013, 08:19 PM
  #13  
il pirata
Banned
 
il pirata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colorado canyons
Posts: 4,078
Received 166 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Bill did do a great write up on the differences...

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...-analysis.html
Old 02-28-2013, 08:22 PM
  #14  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,363
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

That is the thread I was looking for - thanks!
Old 02-28-2013, 08:36 PM
  #15  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,587
Received 1,045 Likes on 471 Posts
Default

LOTS of threads on this subject both here and on the 964 board (and 911UK).

The 993 is an evolution of the 964, the 964 an evolution of the "G" series, and so on back to the original. IMHO, the 964 was a much bigger step, technically speaking at least, than the 993. It introduced power steering, ABS, airbags and a host of other improvements to the ageing 911. The 993 refined and improved these systems, added a new rear suspension, a 6th gear to the transmission, and wrapped it in a body that saw its most significant change since the original.

There are pros and cons to each series of cars relative to technical issues but from an owner's or enthusiast's standpoint, the decision on which car is best is purely subjective. Personally, I love both generations equally. Styling of both is an evolution of the original, and personal preference is just that, personal. I prefer the 964's interior but that's my opinion.

As to "why are 964s cheaper?", its simply a case of age, miles, and condition. At this stage, all 964s and 993s are old cars and value is determined by condition and history more than anything. A good 964 can easily cost more than a 993 if everything is "right". There were slightly more 993s built than 964s by the way which makes the hunt for the "right" 993 SLIGHTLY easier (not much). Finally, it seems that a good, reasonable mile, manual transmission 964C2 coupe is getting VERY difficult to locate and prices reflect this (I know because I've been looking......a really good 964 or 993 is NOT cheap anymore).


Quick Reply: 964 vs 993



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:02 PM.