Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Compression testing ... theory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2013, 09:41 PM
  #1  
ca993twin
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ca993twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Compression testing ... theory

I was reading another thread about testing compression and leakdown on a 993TT. There was some discussion that 135 psi was too low. Which got me to thinking, an always dangerous condition. The 993TT has a compression ratio of 8.0:1. Yes, its crazy low, which probably explains our very crappy fuel mileage. But here's where I need help. If normal atmospheric pressure is 14.7 psi, and you compress it 8.0 times, then I would expect a maximum compression pressure of 8.0 x 14.7 = 117.6 psi. And that's assuming ideal conditions.

So where have I gone wrong? No, scratch that. So what's wrong with my math?
ca993twin is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 09:44 PM
  #2  
slickster85
Rennlist Member
 
slickster85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I thought it was that 35psi was too low and that it should have been at 100psi.
slickster85 is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 09:53 PM
  #3  
ca993twin
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ca993twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slickster85
I thought it was that 35psi was too low and that it should have been at 100psi.
Yes, lots of discussion about the leakdown test and the pressures used. I'm not talking about that.

Originally Posted by Quadcammer
I call bull. First, those results look just a bit too even. That said, I had 150psi give or take about 3psi for the compression test on my turbo.
In fact, my arithmetic seems faulty, if you had a compression ratio of 2.0:1, then you would expect to read 14.7 on the compression gauge, not 29.4. So... according to my model, the max pressure for a 993 TT is 7.0 x 14.7 = 102.9 psi. This is clearly incorrect. Why?
ca993twin is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:24 PM
  #4  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,662
Received 1,392 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slickster85
I thought it was that 35psi was too low and that it should have been at 100psi.
thats the leakdown input pressure provided by the external air compressor.
Quadcammer is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:49 PM
  #5  
ToSi
Burning Brakes
 
ToSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 896
Received 83 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Compression of air within the cylinder is considered adiabatic - the rise in temperature due to compression causes additional pressure increase beyond that predicted by the CR.
ToSi is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:58 PM
  #6  
ca993twin
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ca993twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ToSi
Compression of air within the cylinder is considered adiabatic - the rise in temperature due to compression causes additional pressure increase beyond that predicted by the CR.
Now this sounds right. I'm guessing that there is a formula that WILL predict the max compression pressure based upon the compression ratio plus the added pressure from the heat. And this has probably been made into a simple look-up table for mechanics to use when testing engines. Thanks for this, I'll sleep better tonight.
ca993twin is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:58 PM
  #7  
vincer77
Rennlist Member
 
vincer77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 7,237
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Your equation assumes that temperature doesn't change. But anyone who has put his thumb over the spark plug hole and had the engine cranked knows that the air is bloody hot. When a piston compresses the gas in a cylinder, it is usually assumed to be an isentropic compression meaning no heat is transferred and is reversible (i.e. no change in entropy). The pressure ratio for an isentropic compression is given by:

p2 / p1 = (v1 / v2) ^ (gamma) or p2 = p1* (v1 / v2) ^ (gamma)

v1/v2= compression ratio = 8, and gamma for air is 1.4

p2 = 270 psia = 255.3 psig

much higher than we see. But with a cold engine, the heat transfer assumption is probably not valid. Also, with valve overlap, some of the gas in the cylinder escapes. Both of these factors would yield lower than ideal pressure increase. So the pressure is going to be somewhere between the constant temperature assumption 102.6 psig and the isentropic assumption 255 psig. 135 psig is in that range.
vincer77 is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 11:35 PM
  #8  
ca993twin
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
ca993twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 8,502
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

OK Vince. Now you're just showing off. Actually, That makes sense, even if I didn't do the math. Thanks for the thermodynamics lesson. Rennlist is pretty amazing.
ca993twin is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:01 AM
  #9  
slickster85
Rennlist Member
 
slickster85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yeah, I really should stay out of this thread.
slickster85 is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:11 AM
  #10  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,363
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

You just hadda ask, din't you?

As far as the numbers go, there are enough differences between the gauge accuracies, engine temperature, air temperature and just plain technique as not to worry too much about the absolute numbers unless they area grossly out of range. The delta is important though. Same goes for the leak down gauges, I am looking for the difference between the gauge detached and attached to the cylinder. The delta is the leak-down contributed by the engine.

I have a few compression gauges, and one of my older ones always reads a bit low, but it's repeatability is excellent.

I have not seen any calibration devices for these gauges (unlike torque wrenches where you can buy strain gauges now). I sometimes use compressed air set with a gauge and regulator to test my compression gauge as well as comparing two different gauges.

Cheers,

Mike
Mike J is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:28 AM
  #11  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ca993twin
Thanks for the thermodynamics lesson. Rennlist is pretty amazing.
X2

That was strong.
NP993 is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 02:17 AM
  #12  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ca993twin
I'm guessing that there is a formula that WILL predict the max compression pressure based upon the compression ratio plus the added pressure from the heat. And this has probably been made into a simple look-up table for mechanics to use when testing engines. Thanks for this, I'll sleep better tonight.
Somewhere around here, I have a matrix table from one of the big supercharger rebuilders showing boost pressure on one axis, mechanical CR on the other to display actual CR in the cylinders.

Quite illuminating, to say the very least.

Let me if I can find it over the weekend and if so, I'll post it here.
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 03:40 AM
  #13  
911PERVY
Banned
 
911PERVY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London
Posts: 4,581
Received 225 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Vince, eve though my eyes are now bleeding I must congratulate you, that was the best answer to this reoccurring post I have ever seen!
911PERVY is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 10:53 AM
  #14  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,469
Received 683 Likes on 476 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911PERVY
Vince, eve though my eyes are now bleeding I must congratulate you, that was the best answer to this reoccurring post I have ever seen!
At least that is how it is explained by Wiki.

I came across these CR and Effective CR (turbo) calculators.

Last edited by IXLR8; 01-11-2013 at 11:30 AM.
IXLR8 is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:39 PM
  #15  
vincer77
Rennlist Member
 
vincer77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 7,237
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

A little jealous Alex?
vincer77 is offline  


Quick Reply: Compression testing ... theory



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:24 AM.