Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Feedback on the ECU Dr. aka Specialized ECU Repair?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2012, 12:35 PM
  #31  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,435
Received 678 Likes on 474 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trophy
And you will never see a stock 993 see that amount of increase just from a chip.
Exactly what I would tend to believe, Steve. I'm amazed that they make those claims.


Originally Posted by trophy
Dyno comparisons are really only useful when used as a Base line for seeing if modifications work or not.
And it might prove their chip claims as snake oil. Which is why we never see any of those charts on their sites. They don't even tell you at what RPM their claims were measured at.

A foreign motorcycle magazine that I subscribed to for many years used to do evaluations of aftermarket exhaust systems. They provided the baseline "stock" power and torque curves and laid all other "claims" over them. They did that every few months using different vehicles. The bottom line...save your money...the manufacturers already did 99.9% of the work for you.
Old 12-30-2012, 01:24 PM
  #32  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

"The reverse is not true just because you put higher octane fuel in doesn't mean the ecu will increase the timing till it senses knock and then retard again."

Actually under certain race conditions, i.e. high ambient temp, heavy engine
loads - hard accel from turn, marginal fuel octane, etc., the engine could be
operating in a retarded mode (3 - 9 degrees) the result of knock control.
Now if race gas is used (as stated by the poster), the knock control system
would most likely reduce the retard and thereby increase the torque
(HP - performance).

As has been shown here https://rennlist.com/forums/911-foru...-the-myth.html
for every one degree change in timing an approximate 4 HP change results.
So the change from a non-race octane to a race octane could easily account
for the performance change stated by the poster. That's how sensitive
(responsive) torque is to changes in the timing and why 'tuning' is nothing
more than doing timing tweaks for a stock engine.

Last edited by Lorenfb; 12-30-2012 at 01:49 PM.
Old 12-30-2012, 02:13 PM
  #33  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IXLR8
I've never seen a single dyno run on Rennlist where a stock 993 gained 40 HP and 48 lbf.ft of torque simply by inserting a chip.
Neither have I, however that's never deterred anyone from making such claims (never by me with the exception of Turbo cars!!!).
Old 12-30-2012, 02:33 PM
  #34  
trophy
Race Car
 
trophy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary...Under my car... :)
Posts: 3,918
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

You missed the last bit of my original quote, i said...

Originally Posted by trophy
The reverse is not true just because you put higher octane fuel in doesn't mean the ecu will increase the timing till it senses knock and then retard again. It will allow the ecu to operate at its max per programmed ignition timing.
It will never go above the pre-programmed max ignition timing, , however high octane fule will allow the engine to operate at its max timing for a given condition (load, temp etc)

Originally Posted by Lorenfb
"The reverse is not true just because you put higher octane fuel in doesn't mean the ecu will increase the timing till it senses knock and then retard again."

Actually under certain race conditions, i.e. high ambient temp, heavy engine
loads - hard accel from turn, marginal fuel octane, etc., the engine could be
operating in a retarded mode (3 - 9 degrees) the result of knock control.
Now if race gas is used (as stated by the poster), the knock control system
would most likely reduce the retard and thereby increase the torque
(HP - performance).

As has been shown here https://rennlist.com/forums/911-foru...-the-myth.html
for every one degree change in timing an approximate 4 HP change results.
So the change from a non-race octane to a race octane could easily account
for the performance change stated by the poster. That's how sensitive
(responsive) torque is to changes in the timing and why 'tuning' is nothing
more than doing timing tweaks for a stock engine.
You are correct, Tuning is pushing timing to gain maximum performance. Its what every tuner on the planet does, including OEM like Porsche, Ferrari, etc. Manufacturers leave a little on the table to counter the potential of poor fuel in a given country. The delta is getting less and less, however if someone was looking to get the max out of their car stock or otherwise, they could pick a specific fuel, stick to it and tune for it. Would be pretty inconvenient for a daily driver but for a track or race car would be pretty easy.
Old 12-30-2012, 02:41 PM
  #35  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,435
Received 678 Likes on 474 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Neither have I, however that's never deterred anyone from making such claims (never by me with the exception of Turbo cars!!!).
I see you edited the turbo car bit.

Its a good thing that chip manufacturer isn't a RL sponsor because I could imagine a slew of scenarios...no further comment on that one.
Old 12-30-2012, 02:51 PM
  #36  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IXLR8
I see you edited the turbo car bit.
My statement needed context given that many TT owners read this forum as well.
Old 02-06-2023, 06:49 PM
  #37  
mwalker649
AutoX
 
mwalker649's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1995 993 CCU

I had Specialized CCU exchange my broken CCU. The exchange happen very quickly, I just reinstalled the unit back into the car it works perfectly. Specialized CCU did a great job I highly recommend them. If you have any questions pm me.
Mike Walker
Old 02-06-2023, 10:02 PM
  #38  
systemsc
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
systemsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: SoCal
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 102 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorenfb
"ECU re-flash amounts to 8 whp and 15 ft/lbs of torque on a 97-98 computer (running 98 octane gas)."

So! And most likely above 5K RPMs.

And now the engine requires a higher octane, great right?
As indicated by the data from here;
https://rennlist.com/forums/911-foru...-the-myth.html
a simple timing 'push' appears to the naive as a significant 'tuning' effort. What a joke.
Here's the same post; http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...ning-myth.html
__________________
Loren
Systems Consulting - Automotive Electronics
Specializing in Porsche cars
http://www.systemsc.com/





Quick Reply: Feedback on the ECU Dr. aka Specialized ECU Repair?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:10 PM.