Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Should a 96 C4S have a spare tire ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2012, 04:05 PM
  #31  
Magdaddy
Rennlist Member
 
Magdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oneida, New York
Posts: 4,911
Received 240 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 77'3.6vram
Maybe because the car is not structurally sound with out the spare in place above 55mph.Maybe?
ummm, thats a little much, don't you think?

Is there a proper torque spec for that removeable front crash structure element also?

Last edited by Magdaddy; 09-16-2012 at 04:30 PM.
Magdaddy is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 04:27 PM
  #32  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,512
Received 979 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 77'3.6vram
Just search the site.Type in "spare tire crash". There are as many opinions as there are *******'s.When I picked up my first new Porsche in November of 88' , I was 18 yrs old, I was given a lecture reguarding the importance of keeping the spare tire in place.Why do you think Porsche limits the speed(55 mph)and duration(50 miles max)a spare tire can be used?Why do you think Porsche requires the spare to be replaced as soon as posible? Maybe because the car is not structurally sound with out the spare in place above 55mph.Maybe?
You're kidding right? Have you not checked the safety warnings of ANY space saver spare tire in ANY car? The tire, by design AND NAME, is for temporary use. That is why Porsche, and any manufacturer using a space saver spare tire, advises against exceeding 50MPH or 50 miles.

As to crash safety, I'm NOT an engineer. If you are, fantastic. Personally, I can't see it hurting to have something more up front in an impact, but it is not the ultimate life saving device.

The OP was merely asking if a car he was considering should have one...as in "did it come from the factory with one?". Yes, it did.

To 77'3.6vram: Thanks once again for being less than respectful in voicing YOUR opinion.
timothymoffat is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 04:30 PM
  #33  
77'3.6vram
Banned
 
77'3.6vram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I can only tell you what I have been told repeatedly over the past 24years of air cooled Porsche ownership by over ten indy P-shops & Dealerships.Are you enjoying your mental ************ guys? I know I am. Please keep it cumming.

Last edited by 77'3.6vram; 09-16-2012 at 04:30 PM. Reason: No
77'3.6vram is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 04:50 PM
  #34  
CorrdoBrit
Rennlist Member
 
CorrdoBrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 2,632
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

^^^^ Always classy. Carry on like this and I foresee another 'vacation' in your future.
CorrdoBrit is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 04:59 PM
  #35  
77'3.6vram
Banned
 
77'3.6vram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default You think?

Originally Posted by tcsracing1
You have an interesting point with the spare being part of the impact resistance.

The space saver spare however is limited to 50mph for 50 miles due to speed rating and tread wear of the tire.
Porsche didnt intend anybody to roll the dice against the odds without a spare for 50 miles..... Cause if a front on collison occured within those 50 miles and the spare was absent, then porsche would have a problem on its hands...
Originally Posted by CorrdoBrit
^^^^ Always classy. Carry on like this and I foresee another 'vacation' in your future.
You think?
I may have misspelled a word or two.My bad.
77'3.6vram is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 05:08 PM
  #36  
Bonster
Moderator and 993 whisperer
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: At the track. I reside, however, in Navarre, FL.
Posts: 12,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I never raced Porsches, I raced a Spec Miata within the NASA and SCCA sanctioning bodies. The GCRs/CCRs dictate for the removal of the spare tire, among other rules for the series. I have taken my Porsche to DEs, however. The PCA tech form does not call for the removal of the spare, nor do they require a driver to leave it in. I admit that I do not know which is safer -with or without the spare. I merely follow directions. Am I an expert? Heavens, no. Do I know what I am doing? I am pretty sure that I do. I hope my post helps.

As to the OP ... yes, the car came with an inflatable spare tire along with a pump and tools with which to install the spare. Because it came with the car, it has value. And yes, it is hidden underneath the carpet. There are three plastic fasteners that hold the front down. Turn each fastener 45 degrees and pull up on the carpet. The tire will be below.
Bonster is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 05:12 PM
  #37  
911SLOW
Admin
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
911SLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Athens
Posts: 11,010
Likes: 0
Received 122 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 77'3.6vram
You think?
I may have misspelled a word or two.My bad.

Misspelling is fine. This is not a English grammar forum.. But, your tone on a few threads here is not.
Please reconsider your posting manners before it's too late..

Thanks,

John


PS "On topic" : ), it seems very unlikely to me that Porsche's engineers would depend on any removable structure (in this case a spare tire) to obtain crash worthiness for a car. If that was the case, I think that a warning sticker or any kind of official reference would have "leaked" from the factory..


FWIW, in all my 993s, I had them removed and balanced the weight distribution and rake with a lighter exhaust and/or a proper adjustable suspension.
Removing weight is always a good thing, even if it comes from the front of a 911.. : )
911SLOW is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 05:21 PM
  #38  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 255 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Back in the day, the spare was needed because it supplied air for the windshield washers as on VWs
Bob Rouleau is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 05:23 PM
  #39  
Bonster
Moderator and 993 whisperer
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: At the track. I reside, however, in Navarre, FL.
Posts: 12,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But John . . . couldn't it add ballast? I hope you say that it can . . . I am too lazy to take out my spare at every DE and autocross.
Bonster is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 07:57 PM
  #40  
77'3.6vram
Banned
 
77'3.6vram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I guess the "Man" has spoken.Amazing how many experts there are with different opinions.Bob, what year constitutes being "back in the day" in your opinion? Please clarify for the record.
77'3.6vram is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 08:17 PM
  #41  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If the spare is part of the crash system, why is it only held in place by a wingnut and thin metal bracket, rather than something that would keep it in place in a crash?
NP993 is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 08:27 PM
  #42  
DALLWA
Racer
 
DALLWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

77'3.6vram has to have pictures of someone.

He berates everyone including the moderators, goes from "banned" to "un banned", has selective dyslexia with some disgusting references.

Post the pictures huckleberry!! They got to be pretty freakin awesome.
DALLWA is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 08:34 PM
  #43  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,512
Received 979 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NP993
If the spare is part of the crash system, why is it only held in place by a wingnut and thin metal bracket, rather than something that would keep it in place in a crash?
This more than anything here speaks volumes. The 993 is getting on in years, but it still had to meet crash standards. I can't see an easily removeable part being a major part of the car's structure. If it were, it wouldn't be removeable and, therefore, wouldn't be much use as a spare either.
timothymoffat is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 08:40 PM
  #44  
Paul902
Three Wheelin'
 
Paul902's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Rouleau
Back in the day, the spare was needed because it supplied air for the windshield washers as on VWs
oh yeah, that's right....may also be needed for a James Bond underwater scene.
Paul902 is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 09:00 PM
  #45  
Bonster
Moderator and 993 whisperer
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: At the track. I reside, however, in Navarre, FL.
Posts: 12,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to clarify my own post of recent (#36), Vram... nothing I said was based on opinion. Not one word. What I posted was based upon facts. I respectfully ask that you do the same, please. I know that there is a beautiful wealth of information in that brain of yours - please use it. Thanks.
Bonster is offline  


Quick Reply: Should a 96 C4S have a spare tire ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:55 AM.