Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me decide on new Clutch, DMF or LWF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2012 | 03:33 PM
  #31  
TravisB's Avatar
TravisB
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Maybe I missed it, but how do you plan on using the car, and how do you normally drive? That would be a huge factor in what direction I'd suggest taking.

I have a basically stock '95, mid-year car, non-immobilizer OBD-I with the OBD-II port. Noise varies between almost inaudible to considerable depending on the situation. Took a week or two to really adjust my driving but I haven't stalled in months now (just need to train yourself to either wait until the RPM's come down before popping the clutch, or give it a little blip). I've driven it on an older Rennsport chip, a Wong chip, and two different stock chips (currently on a stock chip). Maybe my car is just special, but I didn't find the stalling to get any better or worse with any of them.

I think I'm going to try and see if I can't capture the "real" sounds of the LWF in and outside of the car with the external mic I got to use with my GoPro..
Old 07-23-2012 | 03:37 PM
  #32  
inkatouring's Avatar
inkatouring
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 59
From: nowhere, but at least I'm getting there fast!
Default

So, to summarize, (1) noise is not a big deal -- unless it is (at least to you); (2) stalling is not an issue -- unless you have a 95 (which you do OP) and then it probably is, but to varying degrees; (3) MWF will resolve stalling issue of 95, but at a cost; and (4) a LWF (or MWF for 95) is definitely the way to go -- unless it isn't because you don't want the noise and the increased responsiveness isn't a big priority. Phew.
Old 07-23-2012 | 03:39 PM
  #33  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by inkatouring
So, to summarize, (1) noise is not a big deal -- unless it is (at least to you); (2) stalling is not an issue -- unless you have a 95 (which you do OP) and then it probably is, but to varying degrees; (3) MWF will resolve stalling issue of 95, but at a cost; and (4) a LWF (or MWF for 95) is definitely the way to go -- unless it isn't because you don't want the noise and the increased responsiveness isn't a big priority. Phew.
Don't forget that a chip is supposed to help a '95 with a LWF.
Old 07-23-2012 | 03:52 PM
  #34  
inkatouring's Avatar
inkatouring
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 59
From: nowhere, but at least I'm getting there fast!
Default

Originally Posted by Mark in Baltimore
Don't forget that a chip is supposed to help a '95 with a LWF.
(2a) a chip will help on a 95 -- but to varying degrees of success.

Seriously, I tried two chips in my 95. Both helped, one more than the other. Neither eliminated stalling.
Old 07-23-2012 | 04:02 PM
  #35  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by inkatouring
(2a) a chip will help on a 95 -- but to varying degrees of success.

Seriously, I tried two chips in my 95. Both helped, one more than the other. Neither eliminated stalling.
Good data point.
Old 07-23-2012 | 04:36 PM
  #36  
Van1's Avatar
Van1
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 64
Default

Bottom line, kind of hard for one to really get a feel for what the LWF is all about from an online forum. I'd say that if you lean more towards track junkie side any extra noise a LWF makes will be no big deal. If you are the type that expects a 15+ year old sports car to drive like a new Lexus you probably won't like a LWF. If you are in between, you need to see if you can get out there and experience someone elses car that has one before you make the choise. Otherwise, online opinions are like, well lets say everybody has one and they all stink. Heck, I know one poster here that thinks RSR mufflers are way too loud and produce too much drone whereas I think they are only mildy louder than Motor Sound muffs. Everybody has different views on these types of things.

BTW, I like my LWF. The extra gear rattle at idle is no big deal for me as is the low pitched gear whine using 1st gear under load. But then again, I'm way into the track side of the car hobby.
Old 07-23-2012 | 05:34 PM
  #37  
axl911's Avatar
axl911
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,559
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by TravisB
...I think I'm going to try and see if I can't capture the "real" sounds of the LWF in and outside of the car with the external mic I got to use with my GoPro..
We can have a contest to see who has the "most rocks in the dryer" sound for the LWF.
Old 07-23-2012 | 05:58 PM
  #38  
rusty993's Avatar
rusty993
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 2
From: SF Bay Area CA
Default

I think the combination of RS mounts and LWF affects the noise. I have LWF and RS mounts, there is a definately two types of sounds I hear. The "rocks in the dryer at idle", and the "grrrr" pulling from low revs. I assume the "grrr" is associated with the RS mounts and the "rocks in the dryer" from the LWF.

The other thing I noticed is a different smell when the clutch is slipped.

The LWF in my 97 I would have given away in the first few months. If you go with a LWF recommend the ISV to be cleaned. I had lot's of stalling from a sluggish ISV. I had to change my driving style. Without running the revs down with the clutch engaged, the engine can stall.

I am happier with the LWF now, but on balance I wouldn't do it again.
Old 07-23-2012 | 06:48 PM
  #39  
ToSi's Avatar
ToSi
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 899
Likes: 84
Default

What is the RPM range where the high load / low RPM 'grrrr' noise is most prevalent? idle-to 1500? 2000? 2500?
Old 07-23-2012 | 06:52 PM
  #40  
Van1's Avatar
Van1
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by ToSi
What is the RPM range where the high load / low RPM 'grrrr' noise is most prevalent? idle-to 1500? 2000? 2500?
I'd say in the idle to 1500 range.
Old 07-23-2012 | 07:44 PM
  #41  
matt777's Avatar
matt777
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 2
From: Alberta, Canada
Default

I just received a new ISV in the mail today from our friends at FD. I thought I would get one and resolve this issue re: old ISV causing lwf fluctuating idle and stalling problems once and for all. If I have a slightly used ISV for sale in the classifieds next week you will know what happened
Old 07-23-2012 | 09:10 PM
  #42  
ToSi's Avatar
ToSi
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 899
Likes: 84
Default

Originally Posted by Van1
I'd say in the idle to 1500 range.
Thanks.. The amount of rattle is somewhat affected by the springs in the hub of the disk.

Do you guys have p/n's for which clutch disk you used? Would be interesting to see if the noise level trends vs. certain disks. If I had to guess, I'd assume the OE GT3 disk is the quietest of the bunch. The worst case would be re-using the original solid disk meant for use w/ the dual mass FW.

Do you notice a clunk or thud when transitioning from fully off the gas to ~ 1/4 to 1/2 open?

Last edited by ToSi; 07-23-2012 at 09:39 PM.
Old 07-23-2012 | 09:27 PM
  #43  
Bill Verburg's Avatar
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,423
Likes: 602
Default

Originally Posted by axl911
We can have a contest to see who has the "most rocks in the dryer" sound for the LWF.
The rocks in a dryer noise is a puzzle to me, some cars exhibit it and others don't. I was in a couple of Cups last years that were horrible, I thought that they were going to fall apart, yet my car w/ the same transmission and clutch flywheel makes no noise at all.
Old 07-23-2012 | 09:47 PM
  #44  
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23,303
Likes: 500
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by ToSi
The amount of rattle is somewhat affected by the springs in the hub of the disk.
It's also affected by the type of motor and transmission mounts, so I wonder if having clutch part numbers will lead to any data accuracy regarding the likelihood of getting noise, however one would quantify and define what is considered "too noisy".
Old 07-23-2012 | 10:22 PM
  #45  
ToSi's Avatar
ToSi
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 899
Likes: 84
Default

^^ good point, please tell us which mounts you're using along w/ disk p/n.

The subjective piece is just that, subjective. Hopefully enough folks reply to help us glean some insight.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:49 PM.