Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Koni FSD's installed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2012, 12:48 PM
  #16  
CamsPorsche
Rennlist Member
 
CamsPorsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 4,364
Received 453 Likes on 191 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doberdog
From all the pictures I have seen of your car, it looks to me that you already have ROW springs. Just use the ones you have?
I don't believe so? My car looks like a monster truck but that will all change this weekend as I'm installing H&R Coilovers...
Old 05-30-2012, 02:43 PM
  #17  
mpgandco
Pro
 
mpgandco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monterey Calif
Posts: 739
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Here is a picture of Rintys car before and after Koni install with M033 Springs.Doesn't look much lower than stock to me.
Rin,I think you said this was ok to post your pictures to
Attached Images   
Old 05-31-2012, 11:28 AM
  #18  
Rinty
Drifting
 
Rinty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,650
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

That's fine, and they've been posted before.

It's hard to tell from the photos, but the front tire to fender lip went from 4 1/2 fingers to 3 fingers, and the rear, from about 3 1/2 to 2. IIRC.

Last edited by Rinty; 06-01-2012 at 01:25 AM. Reason: changed # of fingers
Old 05-31-2012, 05:04 PM
  #19  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,409
Received 667 Likes on 464 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike J
There was some threads a while ago about problems with the FSD's regarding their ability to take a lower stance (given a shorter spring) since the major stroke area was deeper into the shock, as well as questions if the shocks are tuned to various springs, such as the M030's. At that time, I think the issue was raised with Koni - did they address it?
Mike, I read that as well.

From the Koni North America site...
FSD kit must be used with stock height suspension.
Yet when click on "Details" on the same page..."Pair with Eibach springs for 1"-1.5" lowering".

And what "stock ride height"are they referring to, US or ROW?
Old 05-31-2012, 06:39 PM
  #20  
doberdog
Thread Starter
 
doberdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver,BC
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IXLR8

And what "stock ride height"are they referring to, US or ROW?
Both.
Old 05-31-2012, 10:51 PM
  #21  
csmab
Rennlist Member
 
csmab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 560
Received 44 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I am happy with my FSD and M033 set up.
Old 06-02-2012, 11:49 PM
  #22  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,362
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Interesting. I wonder if having koni's on your car will not be as attractive to anbuyer as bilstiens when selling the car?
Old 06-03-2012, 12:19 PM
  #23  
Rinty
Drifting
 
Rinty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,650
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

...having Konis not as attractive....MikeJ
I think there are two aspects to this.

I think Koni is seen by most enthusiasts as a better shock than Munroe.

I think an enthusiast who is looking for Bilsteins on a 993 is probably going to want a car with M030s or equivalent, rather than M033s.

So for an average buyer, I don't think it would matter much.

JMO
Old 06-03-2012, 05:58 PM
  #24  
M. Schneider
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
M. Schneider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: ^^ Werk 1 pictured Yr '00 .. Vail, Colorado
Posts: 2,520
Received 72 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Wouldn't the newer Koni FSD type damper set be viewed as a higher quality OEM (Monroe) replacement? Not quite the same as a move to coil-overs, PSS10s, etc. Independent of the 993 spring set type (ROW M033 or ROW M030) is the FSD damper's performance somewhere between the Bilstein B6 & B8 dampers?

Stock dampers,,,, but different. Kinda sorta yeah....
I'll be making the Koni FSD move shortly.
Old 06-03-2012, 06:35 PM
  #25  
doberdog
Thread Starter
 
doberdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver,BC
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike J
Interesting. I wonder if having koni's on your car will not be as attractive to anbuyer as bilstiens when selling the car?
With the number of people trying these and interested in putting them in, dictates that there is a market...
Old 06-03-2012, 09:15 PM
  #26  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,362
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Hmm, I think the most enthusiasts think Bilstein is THE shock for Porsches - I agree there is a market for putting them only because of price. If a HD Bilstein and a Koni had exactly the same price, I think that most people would go for the Bilstein.

I think that the open public would not care which shocks are in the car, but enthusiasts are looking for Bilstein HD's, PSS-9' s and PSS-10's. This is of course all opinion since we have no proof either way... LOL!

However, if cost is an concern, then these shocks may be the ticket. However, looking at the pictures, the bottom spring perch looks a bit weak, and the diameter of the shock rods is certainly much less than the PSS series, which almost consumes the entire shock body. I guess I should expect that given the 2x-3x the cost.

Cheers,

Mike
Old 06-04-2012, 01:11 AM
  #27  
JM993
Banned
 
JM993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike J
Hmm, I think the most enthusiasts think Bilstein is THE shock for Porsches - I agree there is a market for putting them only because of price. If a HD Bilstein and a Koni had exactly the same price, I think that most people would go for the Bilstein.

I think that the open public would not care which shocks are in the car, but enthusiasts are looking for Bilstein HD's, PSS-9' s and PSS-10's. This is of course all opinion since we have no proof either way... LOL!
True - very subjective.

I personally hate Bilstein HDs and went out of my way to avoid them when shopping for my second 993. A while back, I installed a set on my 95 and quickly exchanged them for KW V3s. Huge improvement. The HDs had way too much compression dampening. Felt like they were valved for an 8000lb garbage truck.

I've found Konis to be preferable to Bilsteins not only on Porsches but BMWs too.

Just my opinion.

Cheers,
Joe
Old 06-04-2012, 02:17 AM
  #28  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,362
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JM993
True - very subjective.

I've found Konis to be preferable to Bilsteins not only on Porsches but BMWs too.

Just my opinion.

Cheers,
Joe
Does that include the dual-spring PSS system as well?
Old 06-04-2012, 02:27 AM
  #29  
JM993
Banned
 
JM993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike J
Does that include the dual-spring PSS system as well?
No, just the Bilstein HDs and Sports.

I'm sure the PSS system coilovers are better. However, I chose the KW V3s over PSS because they are double adjustable (compression and rebound). And if I'm honest, I would have been really pissed at myself if I didn't like the PSS either and had to pull another set of Bilsteins off my car

Cheers,
Joe



Quick Reply: Koni FSD's installed



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:31 AM.