Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fiend says avoid '95 at all costs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2010, 02:41 PM
  #61  
Falcondrivr
Race Car
 
Falcondrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,930
Received 70 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

One other advantage of a '95 (not saying there is one year that is better,) is that my SAI system is in the garbage dump somewhere. Can't do that on the later years.
Old 12-19-2010, 02:44 PM
  #62  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,336
Received 552 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

All OBD1 993 use the same DME, these are all 55pin and were used in all, '94/95 US and all '96-98 RoW normally aspirated.

US '96-98 and all turbos use OBD2, these are 88 pin units which are no faster or better than the OBD1 units, they are more intrusive and difficult to work w/ as well as more expensive to maintain ex OBD2 use 4 O sensors, OBD1 uses 1
Old 12-19-2010, 02:45 PM
  #63  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,336
Received 552 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

you'll probably shoot your eye out if you purchase a '95 though
Old 12-19-2010, 02:59 PM
  #64  
shadow993
Drifting
 
shadow993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 2,287
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Ok.... But you can't get a targa in 95!
Old 12-19-2010, 04:04 PM
  #65  
polaris 993 sport
Rennlist Member
 
polaris 993 sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kungsbacka, Sweden
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I have had mine since new-early build 2-94. I have had no issues and love everything about the 95!
It is well traveled from Los Angeles to the big Island of Hawaii and now Sweden!
It was chipped and you can see by my avatar info-lot's but little has been done. Came with m-30 but changed out the struts and spring for better handling and lower look ect...
It all comes down to finding a well kept car-loved and driven!
Porsche 95's are only slow when sitting!
Your friend is a bit of a maroooon!
Old 12-19-2010, 04:42 PM
  #66  
SOS
Pro
 
SOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 672
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
TSB 9408 defined the changes that were made in 993 suspension





'96 up used the same supension as the late '95s

According to this tsb, the only changes are updated shocks, springs, and stabilizer (anti-roll) bars. If this is the case, then all you need to do to update the suspension on a 94- early 95 is to install aftermarket or row anti-roll bars and aftermarket dampers like pss10's, motons...etc. It mentions nothing about control arms or any other components that would change the actual suspension geometry.
Old 12-19-2010, 04:51 PM
  #67  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,336
Received 552 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SOS
According to this tsb, the only changes are updated shocks, springs, and stabilizer (anti-roll) bars. If this is the case, then all you need to do to update the suspension on a 94- early 95 is to install aftermarket or row anti-roll bars and aftermarket dampers like pss10's, motons...etc. It mentions nothing about control arms or any other components that would change the actual suspension geometry.
That is correct and was my point.

I compared my original rear suspension arms to my new RS replacement arms too. They are identical except for the bushes and years of wear on the old parts
Old 12-19-2010, 05:11 PM
  #68  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,517
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Thanks Bill, that is great info. I'm toward June '94 build (710) so I infer I'm Production 3.
Old 12-19-2010, 05:17 PM
  #69  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,336
Received 552 Likes on 382 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
Thanks Bill, that is great info. I'm toward June '94 build (710) so I infer I'm Production 3.
Don't feel too confident, the oem bushes do deteriorate w/ time

These were from my car when I updated to RS arms
Old 12-19-2010, 05:52 PM
  #70  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,517
Received 79 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

No, don't get me wrong. The car will be 17 years old in June and has a few miles on her. It is just nice to know the parts she was built with. Having said that, mine feels extremely good, although I've only had wet driving opportunities. I'll get her on my lift for a closer inspection of everything and look for some dry weather to assault Palomar Mountain.

Sheesh, if I didnt have the 993 now, it would be no Porsche driving for a few days. Ruby's R's don't like the rain.
Old 12-19-2010, 05:52 PM
  #71  
AOW162435
Seared
Rennlist Member
 
AOW162435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 16,776
Received 415 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Falcondrivr
One other advantage of a '95 (not saying there is one year that is better,) is that my SAI system is in the garbage dump somewhere. Can't do that on the later years.
+ 993.


Andreas
Old 12-19-2010, 06:21 PM
  #72  
CalvinC4S
Drifting
 
CalvinC4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hey Bill why don't you post a screen shot of the control arm part numbers off pet.

96-98 guys can throw there SAI system in the trash as well, they just need to run a
hose that bypasses the heads into the cat. Edit: that works, if it didnt work for you,
you didn't do it right.

As far as OBD1 and OBD2; I spent a week in Reno Nevada at Porsche North America
learning about the new ECU. It blows the OBD1 away in metering/speed, just like your
Dell laptop, they get faster.

Last edited by CalvinC4S; 12-19-2010 at 06:41 PM.
Old 12-19-2010, 07:08 PM
  #73  
rsr91128
Burning Brakes
 
rsr91128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Near St Louis
Posts: 818
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Jeez, I take a break from tearing apart my POS early 95 and this thread is still going on!




Why doesn't somebody that has suspension arms from an early 95, a 96 and a 97 just measure them all and see who is right.

O.K.

Here are toe arms, 95 on bottom, bent 96 in middle, late 97 on top.



The dimensions are exactly the same. The 95 is actually the heaviest, you can see the 95 and 96 have taller "webs", and the 97 are shorter. The only noticable difference is the style (and I'm guessing durometer) of the bushings.

I will have the rest of the early 95 arms off later this month and verify there is no size difference between them, but from 96 to 97 on the KT and camber arms there is no difference except rubber bushing.



So Bill is right (that is a joke as they are both Bill).
Old 12-19-2010, 07:18 PM
  #74  
skywachr
Rennlist Member
 
skywachr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise Valley, Arizona
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There is a strong tendency in this thread to value apocryphal information and opinion over objective facts. Not one of the forum's greatest moments.

To the OP: buy the best car you can find at a fair price. You won't be disappointed either way. There are people here who justifiably love their '96-'98 993s just as much as the '95 owners who have already spoken out.
Old 12-19-2010, 07:20 PM
  #75  
CalvinC4S
Drifting
 
CalvinC4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hey Erik,
Can you post the part numbers of the arms?
This is good stuff, thanks.

This is the area im looking at.


Lets put our energy into learning the truth, not proving our point.


Quick Reply: Fiend says avoid '95 at all costs



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:14 PM.