Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How much of the 993 is Hand Built ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2010, 12:13 AM
  #1  
pewter82
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
pewter82's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Middle Missouri
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default How much of the 993 is Hand Built ?

I was told a few years back ,that the later 93-95 928 GTS's were not hand built as the early cars were. which leads me to the question about my 993. Since it is a 96 model, was Porsche still hand building cars in that year?
Old 01-05-2010, 12:16 AM
  #2  
Augustus Davies
Registered User
 
Augustus Davies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I read somewhere that the 993 is the last of the hand built cars..
Old 01-05-2010, 01:09 AM
  #3  
2Many Cars
Three Wheelin'
 
2Many Cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On the Faultline
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

It depends upon your definition of hand built. As I understand it the 993 panels were all stamped but the fit and assembly was by hand. That's as opposed to for example Aston Martins which until recently had panels made one by one on wooden bucks and matched to each individual car - which in my book is truly hand made. I think Rolls still builds cars that way.
Old 01-05-2010, 01:14 AM
  #4  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

"If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe."
- Carl Sagan
Old 01-05-2010, 01:52 AM
  #5  
ljugete
Rennlist Member
 
ljugete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern IL and SW FL
Posts: 2,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought that the 964 was the last of the hand made 911 series (also the most expensive to build).

Didn't they started the mass production lines with the 993 (last of the air cooled 911 series) or was it the 996 (after Toyota gave them some pointers)?
Old 01-05-2010, 02:19 AM
  #6  
Bruce SEA 993
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bruce SEA 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lat: 47 Deg 26.848N Lon: 122 Deg 21.341W Seattle
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey All,

I have an Autoweek article from 1994 about the saving of Porsche. It is about how the cars went from hand built and then reworked because of poor quality incoming component and part QC to hand built with little rework with the 993. The hours per car went way down.

The 996 ushered in the designed to be assembled fast era.

Porsche hired the Toyota quality ninjas...

PM me and I will send the PDF along. I thought I sent it to Mike at pcarwrokshop but maybe not.

Cheers!
Old 01-05-2010, 11:35 AM
  #7  
Kein_Ersatz
Rennlist Member
 
Kein_Ersatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Flyoverland - Central, Ohio
Posts: 3,234
Received 257 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

I'd say more like hand assembled (excluding windshield placement, painting, sub frame welding, and such), but not hand built. I think the current line in Stuttgart and Leipzig are very similar to what went on with the 993 chassis. Was a recent NatGeo show on the factory in Stuttgart.
Old 01-05-2010, 11:41 AM
  #8  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,195
Received 555 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

If you want to see how Porsche built the cars by hand, download the "Porsche Factory 1960" clip here: http://public.me.com/ilko

Old 01-05-2010, 12:05 PM
  #9  
ZombiePorsche44
Drifting
 
ZombiePorsche44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I was under the impression that the 993's 3.6L was hand built herego the $24,000.00 cost for a 993 crate engine from Porsche and the 1999 and up 996's crate engine costing approx. $9500.00 due to mostly being machine assembled....................ZP44
Old 01-05-2010, 12:37 PM
  #10  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,125
Received 354 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

I recall reading the same comments as Frandk and Bruce mention above.

Really, the point is academic: you don't truly want "handbuilt" if it means inconsistency. Like trying to fit a body panel from one car (say, for accident repair) and it needs add'l hours of reworking just to make it right?!! That brand of "handbuilt" is, thankfully, replaced by machines that are exacting and tireless.

The reference to handbuilt engines (and like critical components), on the other hand, is a good one since machines cannot make certain decisions like skilled humans can.

But the bottom line is the bottom line. If she can't be built economically and be sturdy, there is precious little point to "handbuilt" or "robotic." When customers lose faith, the build method is moot. Which is why Porsche really had to get that whole early-996 engine debacle sorted out fast (and from what I understood, at least they stepped up to the plate and covered owners who plunked down their 60+ large). It was no secret, (to enthusiasts anyway), that the aircooled engine was a freaking monument to longevity ...then this new grenading engine?!! Clearly the mothership got their sales when they made a cost/build-effective model, but they took it in the shorts when it wasn't so, um, "effective" if you have to replace an entire engine! So does anyone really care how their car was built when your brand new high-tilt wondercar is in the shop for a heart transplant?

As Porsche (and everyone else, to be sure) goes toward further mechanation, the quest always will be to make the final result worth having over the long haul. Witness Honda and Toyota, the running joke of the 70s, carve out a loyal (and global) segment of the industry over the decades. And not because of their mechanical process, but because their mechanical process yielded a machine that left owners with a thing of value over time. This is where the venerable 911 heritage shines, clearly, and without debate as witnessed by the numerous iterations not only still running around but with near-rabid loyalty with cars exchanging hands usually for other variants. Loyalty. And the bottom line.
...BTW, can you tell I've got time this morning

Edward
Old 01-05-2010, 12:48 PM
  #11  
goofballdeluxe
Rennlist Member
 
goofballdeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,942
Likes: 0
Received 151 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Edward
I recall reading the same comments as Frandk and Bruce mention above.

Really, the point is academic: you don't truly want "handbuilt" if it means inconsistency. Like trying to fit a body panel from one car (say, for accident repair) and it needs add'l hours of reworking just to make it right?!! That brand of "handbuilt" is, thankfully, replaced by machines that are exacting and tireless.

The reference to handbuilt engines (and like critical components), on the other hand, is a good one since machines cannot make certain decisions like skilled humans can.

But the bottom line is the bottom line. If she can't be built economically and be sturdy, there is precious little point to "handbuilt" or "robotic." When customers lose faith, the build method is moot. Which is why Porsche really had to get that whole early-996 engine debacle sorted out fast (and from what I understood, at least they stepped up to the plate and covered owners who plunked down their 60+ large). It was no secret, (to enthusiasts anyway), that the aircooled engine was a freaking monument to longevity ...then this new grenading engine?!! Clearly the mothership got their sales when they made a cost/build-effective model, but they took it in the shorts when it wasn't so, um, "effective" if you have to replace an entire engine! So does anyone really care how their car was built when your brand new high-tilt wondercar is in the shop for a heart transplant?

As Porsche (and everyone else, to be sure) goes toward further mechanation, the quest always will be to make the final result worth having over the long haul. Witness Honda and Toyota, the running joke of the 70s, carve out a loyal (and global) segment of the industry over the decades. And not because of their mechanical process, but because their mechanical process yielded a machine that left owners with a thing of value over time. This is where the venerable 911 heritage shines, clearly, and without debate as witnessed by the numerous iterations not only still running around but with near-rabid loyalty with cars exchanging hands usually for other variants. Loyalty. And the bottom line.
...BTW, can you tell I've got time this morning

Edward
Well said, Edward.

One thing I might add is that there is no longer an environment present where automakers build things to last. The crucial thing to automakers is that the cars last....until the warranty period expires.
Old 01-05-2010, 12:51 PM
  #12  
ReinerFink
Racer
 
ReinerFink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was lucky enough to go on a factory tour in Stuttgart in '94. The 993's were lined up being "put together by hand" -- meaning that at one spot, the guys fitted the proper calipers to wheel carriers, put the struts on and stuck it to the frame.

We didn't see any engine assembly, but I remember that they were built by a single mechanic, then dynoed and if they didn't meet spec, they were torn down and rebuilt. If they failed again, the were given to one of the senior mechanics and he would see wtf was wrong. hehe.

My wife took detailed notes (she is just that sort of person with a travel diary for each holiday). I'll see if I can dig up her notes and post them. I remember our tour guide said "Are you planning to open your own car factory in America?" on how she kept writing everything down...

My favorite memory was of one employee taking a swig of beer after doing some part of his job.

-reiner
Old 01-05-2010, 12:52 PM
  #13  
matt777
Drifting
 
matt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I wonder if those old guys who did the final 993 body panel finishing with a small hammer are still around?
Old 01-05-2010, 01:08 PM
  #14  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,125
Received 354 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goofballdeluxe
One thing I might add is that there is no longer an environment present where automakers build things to last. The crucial thing to automakers is that the cars last....until the warranty period expires.
Hey GBD,

You are, sadly, so correct on this point. What a bummer of a comment as it speaks so much of where we are in manufacturing today. But when one finds the rare business model where quality still is king, and the customer deserves the best, I stick with that company. I am tired of "disposable" wares and am willing to pay more (within reason, of course) if what I get really is of lasting quality. Precious few companies "get it" but those who do I will reward with my hard-earned buck.

Edward
Old 01-05-2010, 01:14 PM
  #15  
red89
Racer
 
red89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikey_audiogeek
"If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe."
- Carl Sagan
I guess it's all relative.


I've heard Ferraris are hand built.
No Thanks


Quick Reply: How much of the 993 is Hand Built ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:37 AM.