Is Mobil 15W50 recommended?
#46
Race Car
#47
Drifting
Thread Starter
This seems very pertinent to me. In previous discussions the concerns were with M1 reformulating the 15W-50 and significantly lowering ZDDP levels.
This info seems to disagree with that.
Here are the Zn and P stats from the data sheet:
Mobil 1 15W-50
P= 1200
Zn= 1300
Boosted, higher viscosity, fully
synthetic formula designed for
performance vehicles.
HT/HS applications.
Racing and Flat tappet
applications.
SM Rated
It is rated SM... I am no oil engineer but maybe that is another factor. I thought the rating was a result of the formulation, not the cause of.
Guess it's time for a message to Navarro.
This info seems to disagree with that.
Here are the Zn and P stats from the data sheet:
Mobil 1 15W-50
P= 1200
Zn= 1300
Boosted, higher viscosity, fully
synthetic formula designed for
performance vehicles.
HT/HS applications.
Racing and Flat tappet
applications.
SM Rated
It is rated SM... I am no oil engineer but maybe that is another factor. I thought the rating was a result of the formulation, not the cause of.
Guess it's time for a message to Navarro.
#48
Rennlist Member
It looks like great stuff based on the P and Zn levels. My understanding is that the higher viscosity oils don't have to comply with the low P and Zn level requirements of SM. If you look at the Mobil 0W40 levels you will see that they are around 1000 ppm which is disappointing seeing as Porsche recommends it for our engines. I was never confident in Porsche putting much effort into supporting the old stuff and was surprised to even see recommendations on the air cooled cars. I wouldn't expect it to be their focus and they don't have to accept the risk of engine wear.
Totally agree with the current Porsche focus not being on air/oil cooled!
But 15W-50 seems to be good... which leaves me asking the same question again. What was all of the fuss about last year? The word was that M1 15W50 had drastically reduced Zn and P levels. That was the compelling reason to bail on M1.
So...
#49
Drifting
Thread Starter
Right, and I wouldn't recommend 0W-40 (except in pretty cold climates)
Totally agree with the current Porsche focus not being on air/oil cooled!
But 15W-50 seems to be good... which leaves me asking the same question again. What was all of the fuss about last year? The word was that M1 15W50 had drastically reduced Zn and P levels. That was the compelling reason to bail on M1.
So...
Totally agree with the current Porsche focus not being on air/oil cooled!
But 15W-50 seems to be good... which leaves me asking the same question again. What was all of the fuss about last year? The word was that M1 15W50 had drastically reduced Zn and P levels. That was the compelling reason to bail on M1.
So...
ps I didn't intend on starting another dreaded (by some) oil thread but look at what I have done.
#50
Rennlist Member
#51
I believe that the issues with the 15w50 were with the gold cap EP version from 2002? to 2007?? The previous version with the red cap was tried and true for the air-cooleds. The newer silver cap is the revised and re-introduced version, and it has the ~1200ppm Zn/P levels again. Whether or not other formulation changes make the revised version less effective for our cars is another question. Mobil specifically markets the 15w50 (only) for "older valve train designs that may benefit from a higher level of anti-wear normally not required for newer generation vehicles. Mobil 1 15W-50 will also provide better anti-wear protection for higher valve spring tensions in certain racing engines."
Note the above quote pertains to the US version. The Canadian M1 15w50 is a totally different formula apparently, with no mention of a "higher level of anti-wear" on the spec sheet. (See links below.)
Matt, do a VOA if you want to still want to use it, I will do the same and we can compare here. It would be a bit apples-and-oranges anyway, as we'll have to use different labs, but it's something. Like I mentioned previously, I have not found a recent VOA/UOA for M1 15w50.
US:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
CA:
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English/...l_1_15W-50.asp
Note the above quote pertains to the US version. The Canadian M1 15w50 is a totally different formula apparently, with no mention of a "higher level of anti-wear" on the spec sheet. (See links below.)
Matt, do a VOA if you want to still want to use it, I will do the same and we can compare here. It would be a bit apples-and-oranges anyway, as we'll have to use different labs, but it's something. Like I mentioned previously, I have not found a recent VOA/UOA for M1 15w50.
US:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
CA:
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English/...l_1_15W-50.asp
#53
Rennlist Member
#54
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
FWIW, Mobil1 5w/40 Truck-TDiesel oil has ZDDP at 1100 (IIRC).
And the benefit of thinner "cold" oil viscosity to get to moving parts faster/better than the M1 15w/50 is a factor in engine longevity, too, is it not? Afterall, for practical purposes doesn't the "40" weight protect as well as a "50" weight when up to operating temps in a street-driven car? It seems (to this layman, admittedly) the benefit of a lower initial number would be good for our engines in any climate upon startup-to-warmup, no?
Perhaps the 5w/40TTD is a good alternative. Or perhaps the better compromise is to mix this with the 15w/50 in near equal proportions. Thoughts??
Edward
And the benefit of thinner "cold" oil viscosity to get to moving parts faster/better than the M1 15w/50 is a factor in engine longevity, too, is it not? Afterall, for practical purposes doesn't the "40" weight protect as well as a "50" weight when up to operating temps in a street-driven car? It seems (to this layman, admittedly) the benefit of a lower initial number would be good for our engines in any climate upon startup-to-warmup, no?
Perhaps the 5w/40TTD is a good alternative. Or perhaps the better compromise is to mix this with the 15w/50 in near equal proportions. Thoughts??
Edward
#55
Drifting
Thread Starter
I believe that the issues with the 15w50 were with the gold cap EP version from 2002? to 2007?? The previous version with the red cap was tried and true for the air-cooleds. The newer silver cap is the revised and re-introduced version, and it has the ~1200ppm Zn/P levels again. Whether or not other formulation changes make the revised version less effective for our cars is another question. Mobil specifically markets the 15w50 (only) for "older valve train designs that may benefit from a higher level of anti-wear normally not required for newer generation vehicles. Mobil 1 15W-50 will also provide better anti-wear protection for higher valve spring tensions in certain racing engines."
Note the above quote pertains to the US version. The Canadian M1 15w50 is a totally different formula apparently, with no mention of a "higher level of anti-wear" on the spec sheet. (See links below.)
Matt, do a VOA if you want to still want to use it, I will do the same and we can compare here. It would be a bit apples-and-oranges anyway, as we'll have to use different labs, but it's something. Like I mentioned previously, I have not found a recent VOA/UOA for M1 15w50.
US:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
CA:
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English/...l_1_15W-50.asp
Note the above quote pertains to the US version. The Canadian M1 15w50 is a totally different formula apparently, with no mention of a "higher level of anti-wear" on the spec sheet. (See links below.)
Matt, do a VOA if you want to still want to use it, I will do the same and we can compare here. It would be a bit apples-and-oranges anyway, as we'll have to use different labs, but it's something. Like I mentioned previously, I have not found a recent VOA/UOA for M1 15w50.
US:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
CA:
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English/...l_1_15W-50.asp
http://www.imperialoil.ca/Canada-Eng...l_1_15W-50.pdf
#56
Drifting
Thread Starter
...And the benefit of thinner "cold" oil viscosity to get to moving parts faster/better than the M1 15w/50 is a factor in engine longevity, too, is it not? Afterall, for practical purposes doesn't the "40" weight protect as well as a "50" weight when up to operating temps in a street-driven car? It seems (to this layman, admittedly) the benefit of a lower initial number would be good for our engines in any climate upon startup-to-warmup, no?...
#57
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sandy, UT/Fish Haven, ID
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
There is a 993 on this board that has 250,000 miles on the clock with no major engine work. If I recall, he changes the oil roughly every 10,000 miles or so. I believe its been Mobil 1 15 50 the entire time.
You read about top end rebuilds at 50k and then there are those who keep chugging along at 200k+ miles with no major problems.
There will be a lot of people dead on this board before they probably realize some chemical may or may not have had a negative or positive impact on their 993 because the lack of driving it. That is, the average driver. Whats the better story when your old? Having a 993 for 30 years and putting 80k miles on it or 30 years and a million miles?
I have been laid in the front seat of my C4, thats the story I will pass along!!
You read about top end rebuilds at 50k and then there are those who keep chugging along at 200k+ miles with no major problems.
There will be a lot of people dead on this board before they probably realize some chemical may or may not have had a negative or positive impact on their 993 because the lack of driving it. That is, the average driver. Whats the better story when your old? Having a 993 for 30 years and putting 80k miles on it or 30 years and a million miles?
I have been laid in the front seat of my C4, thats the story I will pass along!!
Last edited by 95 C4 993; 10-09-2009 at 01:01 AM.