Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Is Mobil 15W50 recommended?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2009, 12:29 PM
  #46  
trophy
Race Car
 
trophy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Calgary...Under my car... :)
Posts: 3,918
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt777
Hi Steven. Where did you get the Motul?
There are a number of places in Calgary that either keep it or can get it:

Tunerworks, RCTS, Blackfoot Motorsport (Motorbike Dealer)

Alot of the Ducatti dealers keep Motul, slightly different packaging but is the same oil (300v).
Old 10-08-2009, 01:03 PM
  #47  
matt777
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
matt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MarkD
This seems very pertinent to me. In previous discussions the concerns were with M1 reformulating the 15W-50 and significantly lowering ZDDP levels.
This info seems to disagree with that.

Here are the Zn and P stats from the data sheet:

Mobil 1 15W-50
P= 1200
Zn= 1300

Boosted, higher viscosity, fully
synthetic formula designed for
performance vehicles.
HT/HS applications.
Racing and Flat tappet
applications.

SM Rated


It is rated SM... I am no oil engineer but maybe that is another factor. I thought the rating was a result of the formulation, not the cause of.
Guess it's time for a message to Navarro.
It looks like great stuff based on the P and Zn levels. My understanding is that the higher viscosity oils don't have to comply with the low P and Zn level requirements of SM. If you look at the Mobil 0W40 levels you will see that they are around 1000 ppm which is disappointing seeing as Porsche recommends it for our engines. I was never confident in Porsche putting much effort into supporting the old stuff and was surprised to even see recommendations on the air cooled cars. I wouldn't expect it to be their focus and they don't have to accept the risk of engine wear.
Old 10-08-2009, 01:08 PM
  #48  
MarkD
Rennlist Member
 
MarkD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Still here...
Posts: 6,962
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt777
It looks like great stuff based on the P and Zn levels. My understanding is that the higher viscosity oils don't have to comply with the low P and Zn level requirements of SM. If you look at the Mobil 0W40 levels you will see that they are around 1000 ppm which is disappointing seeing as Porsche recommends it for our engines. I was never confident in Porsche putting much effort into supporting the old stuff and was surprised to even see recommendations on the air cooled cars. I wouldn't expect it to be their focus and they don't have to accept the risk of engine wear.
Right, and I wouldn't recommend 0W-40 (except in pretty cold climates)
Totally agree with the current Porsche focus not being on air/oil cooled!

But 15W-50 seems to be good... which leaves me asking the same question again. What was all of the fuss about last year? The word was that M1 15W50 had drastically reduced Zn and P levels. That was the compelling reason to bail on M1.
So...
Old 10-08-2009, 01:10 PM
  #49  
matt777
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
matt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MarkD
Right, and I wouldn't recommend 0W-40 (except in pretty cold climates)
Totally agree with the current Porsche focus not being on air/oil cooled!

But 15W-50 seems to be good... which leaves me asking the same question again. What was all of the fuss about last year? The word was that M1 15W50 had drastically reduced Zn and P levels. That was the compelling reason to bail on M1.
So...
Wasn't it based on the EP version?

ps I didn't intend on starting another dreaded (by some) oil thread but look at what I have done.
Old 10-08-2009, 01:26 PM
  #50  
MarkD
Rennlist Member
 
MarkD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Still here...
Posts: 6,962
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt777
Wasn't it based on the EP version?

ps I didn't intend on starting another dreaded (by some) oil thread but look at what I have done.
oh heck.. maybe it was.

Yeah, we shoulda saved this topic for the winter when we are all bored
Old 10-08-2009, 01:45 PM
  #51  
mongrelcat
Drifting
 
mongrelcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I believe that the issues with the 15w50 were with the gold cap EP version from 2002? to 2007?? The previous version with the red cap was tried and true for the air-cooleds. The newer silver cap is the revised and re-introduced version, and it has the ~1200ppm Zn/P levels again. Whether or not other formulation changes make the revised version less effective for our cars is another question. Mobil specifically markets the 15w50 (only) for "older valve train designs that may benefit from a higher level of anti-wear normally not required for newer generation vehicles. Mobil 1 15W-50 will also provide better anti-wear protection for higher valve spring tensions in certain racing engines."

Note the above quote pertains to the US version. The Canadian M1 15w50 is a totally different formula apparently, with no mention of a "higher level of anti-wear" on the spec sheet. (See links below.)

Matt, do a VOA if you want to still want to use it, I will do the same and we can compare here. It would be a bit apples-and-oranges anyway, as we'll have to use different labs, but it's something. Like I mentioned previously, I have not found a recent VOA/UOA for M1 15w50.

US:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp

CA:
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English/...l_1_15W-50.asp
Old 10-08-2009, 03:34 PM
  #52  
dcdude
Drifting
 
dcdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Bay, Los Angeles
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Mobil 1 15W-50
P= 1200
Zn= 1300

So what are the target levels of P and Zn we're shooting for (again)?
Old 10-08-2009, 03:55 PM
  #53  
MarkD
Rennlist Member
 
MarkD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Still here...
Posts: 6,962
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dcdude68
Mobil 1 15W-50
P= 1200
Zn= 1300

So what are the target levels of P and Zn we're shooting for (again)?
yup

and right about there.
According to LN Engineering, when you get close to or over 2000 ppm, more is not better
Old 10-08-2009, 05:58 PM
  #54  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,072
Received 297 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

FWIW, Mobil1 5w/40 Truck-TDiesel oil has ZDDP at 1100 (IIRC).

And the benefit of thinner "cold" oil viscosity to get to moving parts faster/better than the M1 15w/50 is a factor in engine longevity, too, is it not? Afterall, for practical purposes doesn't the "40" weight protect as well as a "50" weight when up to operating temps in a street-driven car? It seems (to this layman, admittedly) the benefit of a lower initial number would be good for our engines in any climate upon startup-to-warmup, no?

Perhaps the 5w/40TTD is a good alternative. Or perhaps the better compromise is to mix this with the 15w/50 in near equal proportions. Thoughts??

Edward
Old 10-08-2009, 09:26 PM
  #55  
matt777
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
matt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dcdude68
Mobil 1 15W-50
P= 1200
Zn= 1300

So what are the target levels of P and Zn we're shooting for (again)?
I thought I read that 1200 was the target (Charles Navarro?)

Originally Posted by mongrelcat
I believe that the issues with the 15w50 were with the gold cap EP version from 2002? to 2007?? The previous version with the red cap was tried and true for the air-cooleds. The newer silver cap is the revised and re-introduced version, and it has the ~1200ppm Zn/P levels again. Whether or not other formulation changes make the revised version less effective for our cars is another question. Mobil specifically markets the 15w50 (only) for "older valve train designs that may benefit from a higher level of anti-wear normally not required for newer generation vehicles. Mobil 1 15W-50 will also provide better anti-wear protection for higher valve spring tensions in certain racing engines."

Note the above quote pertains to the US version. The Canadian M1 15w50 is a totally different formula apparently, with no mention of a "higher level of anti-wear" on the spec sheet. (See links below.)

Matt, do a VOA if you want to still want to use it, I will do the same and we can compare here. It would be a bit apples-and-oranges anyway, as we'll have to use different labs, but it's something. Like I mentioned previously, I have not found a recent VOA/UOA for M1 15w50.

US:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp

CA:
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English/...l_1_15W-50.asp
The actual label says it has extra wear additives. I was told that the product line has been streamlined in Canada as the Esso lubes are gone and only Mobil exists. If you go to the Mobil1.ca site you will eventually find this:
http://www.imperialoil.ca/Canada-Eng...l_1_15W-50.pdf
Old 10-08-2009, 09:39 PM
  #56  
matt777
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
matt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Edward
...And the benefit of thinner "cold" oil viscosity to get to moving parts faster/better than the M1 15w/50 is a factor in engine longevity, too, is it not? Afterall, for practical purposes doesn't the "40" weight protect as well as a "50" weight when up to operating temps in a street-driven car? It seems (to this layman, admittedly) the benefit of a lower initial number would be good for our engines in any climate upon startup-to-warmup, no?...
You make a very good point. I believe a very large part of the wear, at least on some components, is incurred on start-up. Only a specialist could say when increased wear kicks in as the temp. drops. I don't plan on starting it up below freezing anyway.
Old 10-08-2009, 11:17 PM
  #57  
95 C4 993
Rennlist Member
 
95 C4 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sandy, UT/Fish Haven, ID
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There is a 993 on this board that has 250,000 miles on the clock with no major engine work. If I recall, he changes the oil roughly every 10,000 miles or so. I believe its been Mobil 1 15 50 the entire time.

You read about top end rebuilds at 50k and then there are those who keep chugging along at 200k+ miles with no major problems.

There will be a lot of people dead on this board before they probably realize some chemical may or may not have had a negative or positive impact on their 993 because the lack of driving it. That is, the average driver. Whats the better story when your old? Having a 993 for 30 years and putting 80k miles on it or 30 years and a million miles?

I have been laid in the front seat of my C4, thats the story I will pass along!!

Last edited by 95 C4 993; 10-09-2009 at 01:01 AM.
Old 10-09-2009, 09:40 AM
  #58  
bluejam
Rennlist Member
 
bluejam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been laid in the front seat of my C4, thats the story I will pass along!!
__________________
+1....me too!
Old 10-09-2009, 02:35 PM
  #59  
dcdude
Drifting
 
dcdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Bay, Los Angeles
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

^^ You nasty boys! ^^ One advantage of being shorter than me, Jody!
Old 10-09-2009, 04:21 PM
  #60  
Rinty
Drifting
 
Rinty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,650
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Don't try it in an MG Midget...


Quick Reply: Is Mobil 15W50 recommended?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:23 PM.