Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which 1st year Porsche had the least problems?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2009, 08:27 PM
  #1  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,729
Received 406 Likes on 257 Posts
Default Which 1st year Porsche had the least problems?

I got a chance to go to the local introduction of the Panamera this past week. Regardless of what you think about the looks, it's an impressive piece of engineering.

But as I sat there enjoying the nice shiny paint and smell of expensive leather, I was thinking, "so what problems are hidden within this latest model"? How many times will the Check Engine Light come on with this thing? Lots of new technology here.

Looking at the older cars, they all had some technical issue; overheating reactors, failing chain tensioners, blown air boxes, weak valve guides, RMS issues, porus engine casings, bad wiring harnesses, CEL lights, and the list goes on.

Not just because I have a 993, but looking at all the models, it appears to me that the 1st year 993 and maybe the 1st year SC and Carrera had the least number of major problems, and problems that continued past the warranty period. I'm not familiar with the Cayman but I haven't heard of many problems with them either. I'm curious which Porsche model or models you think had the least first year problems. I know it's said never to buy the first model year of any car but many still do.

Last edited by autobonrun; 09-28-2009 at 10:18 PM.
Old 09-28-2009, 08:33 PM
  #2  
bart1
Race Car
 
bart1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Gotta be 993, 997 or Cayman (though it's mostly a hardtop Boxster with the bugs worked out). SC was also good, but then there are the popoff valves, chain tensioners etc.
Old 09-28-2009, 08:36 PM
  #3  
blitz928
Race Car
 
blitz928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'd have to go with the 993, my '95 was the most reliable car I ever owned, and as reliable for her new owner as well.
Old 09-28-2009, 08:50 PM
  #4  
VNTGSPD
Rennlist Member
 
VNTGSPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Pretty much impossible to prove, but I'm gonna say the "901". There's just not much to go wrong with these early cars and the standards were a little different back then as well.


Though, to be fair this should be evaluated with consideration given to total production. So, since Porsches are pretty reliable in general, it is quite possible that the first year model with the least number of issues (as a percentage of total units) is going to be whichever model had the greatest first year sales. Anyone know what that is? Probably front engined I'd guess...
Old 09-28-2009, 09:03 PM
  #5  
993/907
Pro
 
993/907's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

See my post of 9-19 (page 6, about 7 up from the bottom) regarding "best looking....and reliable". The 993's are considerably sophisticated compared to the earilier cars (I've had two '83 SC's and a '69 T) in my opinion, yet more reliable. I think that is one reason the values have held up so well.....
Old 09-28-2009, 09:23 PM
  #6  
AOW162435
Seared
Rennlist Member
 
AOW162435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 16,776
Received 415 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

My '95 (6/94 build date) has been utterly reliable. I've changed countless bits & pieces over the last 4 years because I wanted to, but the car has in no way developed an actual problem.

As for first year production, the 993 was in circulation for quite some time in Europe before landing here.


Andreas
Old 09-28-2009, 09:32 PM
  #7  
ninjabones
Rennlist Member
 
ninjabones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philly suburbs
Posts: 1,865
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I've had a 944, boxster S, 993 cab, 993 track car and an 06 Cayenne S. My pepper is the most reliable and least problematic of all my p-cars (maybe because I haven't had an opportunity to put her on a track yet).
Old 09-29-2009, 04:45 AM
  #8  
Amfab
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Amfab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My 3.2 carrera. The thing just kept going
Old 09-29-2009, 12:00 PM
  #9  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VNTGSPD
Pretty much impossible to prove, but I'm gonna say the "901". There's just not much to go wrong with these early cars and the standards were a little different back then as well.
Whoa there...........ever talk to (or work with) anyone who was there when the 911 was first introduced? Plug fouling from the Solex carbs, and splash fill chain tensioners? Not to mention oil leaks from 6 stud exhaust covers.

Plus, I'm not really sure how anyone can call an SC or 3.2 Carrera a "new" model. At least not like the clean sheets that the Cayenne, Panamera, etc are. (Though I suppose it's only the Panamera chassis that's new.) And the valve guide and tensioner issues were just following along the same problems their immediate predecessors had.

I'll throw my vote out there for one of the two humblest of all things Porsche--the 914/4 or 924 (I'm too young to remember first year of production 356's!). Build quality may have been suspect, but I really don't remember hearing a lot of total system failure stories.
Old 09-29-2009, 02:38 PM
  #10  
2Many Cars
Three Wheelin'
 
2Many Cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On the Faultline
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I subscribe to the simple car = fewer things to go wrong truism. Also the 911 is basically an evolutionary car so I'm not sure "new" fully applies here. That said the Panamera is both complex and totally new so I'd expect reliability to be average at best.
Old 09-29-2009, 07:57 PM
  #11  
soltino
Rennlist Member
 
soltino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

As far as all new there aren't many and i'd have to say 928.


tino
Old 09-29-2009, 08:35 PM
  #12  
ReinerFink
Racer
 
ReinerFink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

95 993's don't count as the Europeans got to work out 2 years of kinks.. ;-)

-reiner
Old 09-29-2009, 10:38 PM
  #13  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,729
Received 406 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ReinerFink
95 993's don't count as the Europeans got to work out 2 years of kinks.. ;-)

-reiner
That's a good point about the Euro models. Still the only real intro problem I recall with the early cars was the wiring harness and those got replaced under warranty. Given the fact that there was lots of new technology in those cars, including the rear suspension, I'm voting first year 993. It seems the warning about first year cars doesn't apply to the 911 series.
Old 09-30-2009, 12:05 AM
  #14  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,469
Received 682 Likes on 476 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ReinerFink
95 993's don't count as the Europeans got to work out 2 years of kinks.. ;-)

-reiner
I'm glad you posted that because as a newbie, I was a bit confused as to what years the 993 was produced; I've read 1993 to 1998 and also 1995 to 1998.

So it seems the latter isn't really a production run, at least not as far as the Porsche factory is concerned.
Old 09-30-2009, 12:15 AM
  #15  
vjd3
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
vjd3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,100
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Interesting premise They have all had their issues right out of the gate, although the early 911 (pre 74) was pretty good, as I recall, except for the chain tensioners leaking and collapsing. That destroyed a few engines. Good old interference engine.

74-77 2.7 911S pulled studs right out of the case (and had bad chain tensioners)

78-83 3.0 911SC snapped the head studs instead of pulling them, blew air boxes when they backfired and exploded their clutches (and had bad chain tensioners)

84-89 3.2 Carrera was basically an SC with Motronic, but it had premature valve guide wear issues, believed to be because of the Viton seals Porsche used; 87-88 G-50 also had needle pin issue on clutches

90-91 3.6 964 had cylinder head oil leaks because there was no seal, defective dual mass flywheels and broke distributor belts, which fried a few engines due to detonation, depending on when the second distributor happened to be firing after the belt broke

Early on, the only problem I recall on the 993 out of the gate was problems with some piston rings never seating correctly on break-in and the engines drinking oil, but that was not all engines. And, of course, we have the dreaded SAI issue that emerged later.

The 996 has its rear main seal issue. I haven't kept up with the 997 ...


Quick Reply: Which 1st year Porsche had the least problems?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:42 PM.