I love my underpowered '95!
#17
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
#18
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Like I said, we no longer removed the throttle cable from the engine end. It's easier to take it off from the throttle cable end and remove the entire cable. Interestingly that's what the factory shop manual recommends.
#19
Noodle Jr.
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would still prefer to have the cooling off function for the engine.
#20
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With track events there are always a cool down laps to allow cars to cool down.
#21
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With the engine dropped down a little so you can reach in from the left side of the car. One person pull and another push from behind the grummet. It also will help if you spray a little brake parts cleaner on the grummet to help squeeze it back in.
Like I said, we no longer removed the throttle cable from the engine end. It's easier to take it off from the throttle cable end and remove the entire cable. Interestingly that's what the factory shop manual recommends.
Like I said, we no longer removed the throttle cable from the engine end. It's easier to take it off from the throttle cable end and remove the entire cable. Interestingly that's what the factory shop manual recommends.
See the link in my sig for details/pics
#22
Noodle Jr.
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#23
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
#24
Noodle Jr.
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was doing it for looks only really. I just like a clean look.
#26
Race Car
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Jose Kalifornia Demokratische Republik
Posts: 3,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's not only cooling after engine shut down. There are 3 modes of operation as described in Streather's 993 Companion, pp 349 - 350.
![manual](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/rtfm.gif)
(been waiting a long time to use that smiley
)
![manual](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/rtfm.gif)
(been waiting a long time to use that smiley
![Stick Out Tongue](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
RS heater bypass.....
There are two function to the blower fan on the left side. (1). To give a boost to the heater, more air flow through the heat exchanger besides just from the engine cooling fan. (2). To cool off the cylinder head after shut down to prevent heat soak.
I would still prefer to have the cooling off function for the engine.
There are two function to the blower fan on the left side. (1). To give a boost to the heater, more air flow through the heat exchanger besides just from the engine cooling fan. (2). To cool off the cylinder head after shut down to prevent heat soak.
I would still prefer to have the cooling off function for the engine.
#27
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yup, I'll keep my blower thank you very much. After a track session, I leave the key in the ignition for about 15 minutes, which causes the blower to push air over the heads. That really cools the entire engine bay really well.
#28
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The non Vario Ram 993 is better than the Vario Ram in nearly every way. It's cheaper to buy, cheaper and easier to do maintrenance, the engine is more responsive, it's lighter, it's cheaper and easier to chip (concervative 300HP with FVD chip and sport mufflers, the Vario Ram also will give 300HP with chip and sport mufflers), the non VRam does not have OBDII port, i.e. easier smogg tests, you can use cat delete pipes without CEL, the list goes on and on. The German magasine Auto Motor und Sport tested the non VR and VR 993's side by side, both did 0-100km/h (62mph) in 5.2 seconds, and at standstill to 1km the non VR was 0.2 seconds faster! The only benefit of the VR is the higher torque on low rpm, so if you put-put around town in 4th gear the VR is the thing. Until you clog up the SAI and get a CEL and fail smog test on the next inspection. So why do people want the VR? It looks cooler and it's newer than the non VR. The verdict of the non VR v.s. the VR, is that Porsche abandoned the VR system, and for all 986/987 and 996/997 cars went back the the non VR of the 94-95 model 993, using a fixed resonance chamber in the air intake, with an on/off butterfly valve to optimize air induction over the rpm range. Let all the "ignorant" have the VR 993's, while the 993 connoisseurs choose the non VR cars.
#29
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts