My 993s new stance
#16
just my 2cents I used 10x18 ET56 w/ 265/35, rolled fenders and at low height the tires will kiss the lips on the drivers side. Stiffer springs might stop that, dunno but it's already got -3 camber. ET 65 even w/ 285/30 is no problem
#17
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
We'll see...
On a side note, now that I got the lower ends of the Motons working (replaced the uniball joints), one of the quick-release connectors (that connects the shock to the canister) has gone south. I need to call Moton again. I hope it doesn't take 4months this time like it did with the uniballs...
#18
My car is at ~RS height and there is very little compression travel with the Motons. I have been running these very LMs with the 285s on them at the track and it never rubbed. The ET is 55 but I had 8mm spacers, so the actual ET was 47. Now I'm down 8 more mm to ET 39. It is very close but I think it will not rub. There is plenty of room to gain by rolling the fenders though.
We'll see...
...
We'll see...
...
The widebody cars use 10 ET40 and they have fenders that are 30mm wider per side
#19
Burning Brakes
It's extremely difficult to believe that any 10 W/ an ET below 56 can fit on a lowered car, 10 ET56 is ok at RoW M030 but not at RS in my expereince. How sure are you of the widths and o/s's
The widebody cars use 10 ET40 and they have fenders that are 30mm wider per side
The widebody cars use 10 ET40 and they have fenders that are 30mm wider per side
Also, my previous Fikse FM10's were 18x10.5 et 57mm. So the volks are 1mm further out than my old fikses.
Last edited by MrRoboto; 03-17-2009 at 04:38 AM.
#20
It's extremely difficult to believe that any 10 W/ an ET below 56 can fit on a lowered car, 10 ET56 is ok at RoW M030 but not at RS in my expereince. How sure are you of the widths and o/s's
The widebody cars use 10 ET40 and they have fenders that are 30mm wider per side
The widebody cars use 10 ET40 and they have fenders that are 30mm wider per side
I also know that "David in LA" runs 11x18 ET52 in the rear on his 993 Cab without issues. With that in mind, I don't think 10x18 ET56 will be a problem. But all cars are individuals so one would have to test fit to make sure..
Just food for thought..
#22
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
It's extremely difficult to believe that any 10 W/ an ET below 56 can fit on a lowered car, 10 ET56 is ok at RoW M030 but not at RS in my expereince. How sure are you of the widths and o/s's
The widebody cars use 10 ET40 and they have fenders that are 30mm wider per side
The widebody cars use 10 ET40 and they have fenders that are 30mm wider per side
Yes, but my LM's are 9,5 x18"
On a side note, now that I got the lower ends of the Motons working (replaced the uniball joints), one of the quick-release connectors (that connects the shock to the canister) has gone south. I need to call Moton again. I hope it doesn't take 4months this time like it did with the uniballs...
i.e. the connector was ok, I just had to let the 12bar (185psi) air pressure out of the canister, re-connect and re-pressurise the canister again. (for this I used a cigarette lighter air pump). -> all is well! =)
#25
Right now that car is running 295 PS2s and has a slight rubbing on the right side on big bumps ; the previous set up with 285 SO2s had no rubbing at all...the PS2 has a substantially wider and squarer shoulder profile vs other brands/models, even with the same size tire. BTW I'm not the only one running an 11" ET52 in the rear here...it will fit but it is very dependent not only on tire size but also brand and model. Unfortunately its not the no-brainer, guaranteed easy fit as it is with a 10" ET65. Also if you look at the application list for Gemballa wheels in the catalog it indicates that their 10" ET52 can be used w/o any fender modification (so a 10mm can be fitted with MY02s with minimal issues). That list btw doesn't show my 11" ET52 fitting NB 993s but does show it fitting MY01 996 with fenders rolled.
That same list also shows an 8.5" ET46 fitting in the front w/o any modification of the fenders and 9" ET40 fitting with rolled fenders....I have fitted both of these size rims/offsets and can confirm that they fit as the list describes and that the 9" ET40 may have been able to fit w/o modification had I stuck with a 225 or 235 instead of the 245 that is on there. It also shows that a 9" ET52 will fit the front w/o fender rolling and is why previously I was looking for a 9" MY02 from a Boxster to use up front along with 10" ET53 (ET65 plus 12mm spacer) on another car....unfortunately I never found a pair that wasn't part of a set.
Last edited by David in LA; 03-18-2009 at 03:07 AM.
#26
The Gemballa application list shows that 11" ET40 on a widebody fits with rolled fenders but you know that there is still lots of room. An 11.5" ET33 will fit so you have AT LEAST another 1/2" of clearance available on the fender side.
#27
But as Juha said, his wheels are 9.5" ET56, which translates to 10" ET62, which is pretty close to stock. Should be an easy fit for him .
#28
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
BTW Viggo, I will probably pay a visit to Stockholm in May, if I do, I'll take the Porsche with me!
Here's a side shot and a close-up shot from the rear.
#30
Rennlist Member
Would like to know the verdict on this LM inside mount. Any Rubbing?
I have 10 X 18 os 65
8.5 X 18 os 50.
Really would like to mount the centers on the inside, but...
I have 10 X 18 os 65
8.5 X 18 os 50.
Really would like to mount the centers on the inside, but...