Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Thoughts on partial oil changes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2007, 03:22 PM
  #16  
RallyJon
Weathergirl
Rennlist Member
 
RallyJon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SE PA
Posts: 4,895
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I'd feel completely fine leaving the small oil filter in there and replace that, say, every other year
Does the small filter fill up/wear out at a slower rate than the big one?
Old 05-25-2007, 09:15 PM
  #17  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,117
Received 348 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

From my understanding, the large oil filter is considered the "main" filter for the engine oil. The small one is for filtering the oil to the heads, more specifically the valve train because of the tight tolerances in the hydraulic lash adjusters. From this I presume far less oil flows through this filter media, which suggests why the factory allows an interval twice as long.

My feeling on this matter is that 12-15K miles on a filter "designed" (and I use that term loosely) to filter at 30K mile intervals still offers a comfortable "cleaning margin," if you will.

If there is anyone with direct knowledge on this issue of the small filter's task and longevity, I'd be glad to hear it as I am in no way expressing any points based on hard data.

Edward
Old 05-25-2007, 09:33 PM
  #18  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Both filters are full-flow filters, with all of the oil passing through each filter. One filter is in the scavenge circuit (large) while the other is in the pressure circuit (small). The size difference is likely due to the fact that the first filter usually traps more contaminants than the second filter. With syn oil, don't wait for it to turn "black" like dino oil, as it won't.

Once you shorten the factory recommended interval for oil (15k) and filter(30k) changes, it is up to the individual as to where to stop. I too find it interesting to see the rationalizations explained.
Old 05-28-2007, 01:09 PM
  #19  
Slow Guy
Race Director
 
Slow Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 10,272
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZombiePorsche44
I'm always amazed at the logic of trying to save a small amount of money on an uber important low cost service when the car really deserves better and a full rebuild is in the neighborhood of 15K.

I have a full change with both filters done (at a cost of $180.00) every year even with only a 5000mi per yr avg., that's only $15.00 per month for the peace of mind it brings me, which in my book is a great value.

ZP44
And so you're saying that by not changing the filters every time on a car that gets 3,000 mi. between changes that we're shortening the lifetime of our engines? Do you have proof of that?

Maybe it's just that I'm not hung up on replacing something that doesn't need replacing, it has nothing to do w/ the cost of filters.
Old 05-28-2007, 01:34 PM
  #20  
CentralCoastC4S
Instructor
 
CentralCoastC4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carmel, CA
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just went through all of this discussion in my head and went ahead and changed the oil and both filters on my 993C4S. It had been more than a year, far less than the recommended miles but I was not comfortable with the time
between changes. I live in an area where it's often hard to get the car up to full temps, even after driving for a while. I assume I'm getting some condensation in the oil as a result. Also, look at the oil system diagram
in the factory manual. That little filter is in a fairly important part of the oil system. If I'm reading the manual correctly, it's in the system that also includes the lifters, the cam spray bar and the crank squirters. Is that correct?
If so, why not change that filter everytime you change the other one. It's not
that big a deal, get the right wrench, remove the rubber ducting hose and the
oil return line and you are there.
I agree there is no point in wasting money on oil and filters too frequently but I've always thought that on cars that get driven less than frequently, may not always get up to full temps- change the oil at least once a year.
Found my Mobil 1 15-50 at Target, not cheap but at least they have it.
Old 05-28-2007, 02:13 PM
  #21  
pedsurg
Three Wheelin'
 
pedsurg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about the flip side of this issue?? Change the filters per facory spec but replace the oil alone, MORE frequently as described above.
Thanks
Jack
Old 05-28-2007, 04:05 PM
  #22  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 993BillW
And so you're saying that by not changing the filters every time on a car that gets 3,000 mi. between changes that we're shortening the lifetime of our engines? Do you have proof of that?

Maybe it's just that I'm not hung up on replacing something that doesn't need replacing, it has nothing to do w/ the cost of filters.
Then why change the synthetic oil at 3,000 miles, or do you believe it needs replacing?
Old 05-30-2007, 04:50 PM
  #23  
Slow Guy
Race Director
 
Slow Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 10,272
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bull
Then why change the synthetic oil at 3,000 miles, or do you believe it needs replacing?
Simply because I like to change the oil once a year at least. I drive the 993 apx 4k per year. However, when I do drive the 993 it's for longer drives and the oil gets a chance to warm up completely. I don't like doing short grocery runs with this car, I have others for that duty.
Old 05-30-2007, 05:05 PM
  #24  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,117
Received 348 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

FWIW, it's generally accepted (by many wrenches, if you take stock in that sort of thing) that low annual-mile/low-use cars should have their oil changed annually, regardless of mileage. Water content from unburned condensation is no good for the load-bearing surfaces within the engine, nor is it good for the other contaminants from the combustion process to just float around. So even though the oil is often not "used up" in the strict sense, it is no longer as "useful" (or maybe "effective" is better) as it was.

Edward
Old 05-30-2007, 05:25 PM
  #25  
Slow Guy
Race Director
 
Slow Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 10,272
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Edward
FWIW, it's generally accepted (by many wrenches, if you take stock in that sort of thing) that low annual-mile/low-use cars should have their oil changed annually, regardless of mileage. Water content from unburned condensation is no good for the load-bearing surfaces within the engine, nor is it good for the other contaminants from the combustion process to just float around. So even though the oil is often not "used up" in the strict sense, it is no longer as "useful" (or maybe "effective" is better) as it was.

Edward
I'm no expert but this would make sense to me. However, BMW seems to be moving away from this, at least w/ regard to their "free" scheduled maint. From what I've heard they won't do the oil change unless the "oil service" light is on.

FWIW, when my wife's new 328 comes in I'll not only replace the oil/filter after the first 1,500 mi. (not covered) but also change the oil (at least) every 7,500 mi. (again not covered).

I'm thinking about getting a '02 M3 for a daily driver/DE car but if the PO has only done BMW's recommended maint. I'm not sure I'd want to buy it.
Old 05-30-2007, 06:43 PM
  #26  
Red rooster
Three Wheelin'
 
Red rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia , Canada
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The oil quality can be seriously affected by repeatedly making short trips , even if the milage builds up over a year .
The 911 loves at least a 20 mile trip to get the oil/motor right up to temperature and give the motor internals a good clean out - boils the water off .

Bottom line is that oil / filter change based on annual mileage should have how much long trip mileage is part of the equation !

Geoff

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KS400200 , the oldest 964 on Rennlist , unless you know differently !
Old 05-30-2007, 07:21 PM
  #27  
FLYT993
Rennlist Member
 
FLYT993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,169
Received 96 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

I change everything every 5k.

However, I will be talking with Chris W. next time I decide to do this because at $300 (parts/labor; $100 for oil & filters/$193 for indie labor) I need to learn how to do this myself. I also find myself driving the car more and more. I don't understand how anyone can have one of these and only drive it 6k/year or less. That's just me though, to each his or her own. I've wanted one ever since I was a little boy, and now that I have one, I intend to enjoy it. I never put her on the road for less than 20 minutes, and always take the long, long way home just to have more seat time.
Old 05-31-2007, 12:33 AM
  #28  
Edward
Addicted Specialist
Rennlist Member
 
Edward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: So.CA
Posts: 6,117
Received 348 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 993BillW
... BMW seems to be moving away from this, at least w/ regard to their "free" scheduled maint. From what I've heard they won't do the oil change unless the "oil service" light is on....
I'm thinking about getting a '02 M3 for a daily driver/DE car but if the PO has only done BMW's recommended maint. I'm not sure I'd want to buy it.
BMW is not alone in this. More and more manufacturers are going with longer service intervals. Reason is simple: cost. If the car has "free" service, the savings is obvious to the dealer and mfr. But manufacturers also want to use the "see, our cars need less maintenance" angle to help sell their cars ...not only on the showroom floor but also as fleet/business vehicles. Who cares if the car's mechanicals are stressed; the service cost is reduced! BMW even has the "sealed for a lifetime" transmission fluid. Yeah, I'm sure that super-duper teutonic oil is perfectly fine at 100K miles.

Edward
Old 05-31-2007, 12:48 AM
  #29  
Dick in TN
Racer
 
Dick in TN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 345
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Our family car is a '97 BMW 540i that we bought with 30K miles, now has 130K.
Transmission fluid never changed, as it is lifetime fill, and operates perfectly.
Engine oil changed per the service light, which is 12 to 15K, with Mobil1.
Have never needed to add oil between oil changes.
Old 05-31-2007, 02:00 AM
  #30  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Edward
BMW is not alone in this. More and more manufacturers are going with longer service intervals. Reason is simple: cost.
Another reason is that most new oil level sensors can also measure the condition and quality of oil and not just the level. Mercedes Benz has been using a simple version of these since MY98 while the new'n'improved sensors are starting to show up more frequently in other european cars. The North American based manufacturers have been calculating oil condition based on your driving habits and data from multi-million mile driving tests since sometime in the mid to late nineties.


Quick Reply: Thoughts on partial oil changes?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:18 AM.