Stock suspension vs M030 US
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Stock suspension vs M030 US
My car 96 C4S came with the M030 US setup. I've got a couple questions. First, is the height of the M030 US suspension setup the same as the stock suspension? I can't believe stock could be any higher than mine.
Second, are the shocks on the M030 US the same as those on the stock setup?
Lastly, do the M030 US and M030 ROW suspensions have the same size sway bars? If they do, I plan to only order the ROW springs and shocks and save a few dollars.
thanks.
Second, are the shocks on the M030 US the same as those on the stock setup?
Lastly, do the M030 US and M030 ROW suspensions have the same size sway bars? If they do, I plan to only order the ROW springs and shocks and save a few dollars.
thanks.
#2
Race Director
Originally Posted by autobonrun
My car 96 C4S came with the M030 US setup. I've got a couple questions. First, is the height of the M030 US suspension setup the same as the stock suspension? I can't believe stock could be any higher than mine.
The ride hight was set by the US Gov. so that all, inc. sport versions were at the same height. As far as whether the US Sport versions could be adjusted lower w/ their (sport) stock components I do not know the answer to that.
#3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
All US suspensions were the same ride height.
Do a search on your questions and you will see the different specs. Also check out www.p-car.com and www.carnewal.com
Do a search on your questions and you will see the different specs. Also check out www.p-car.com and www.carnewal.com
#4
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Thanks. I'll go back through the links again. I guess if ride height is the same, we're only talking about either sway bar diameters or spring rates. I don't recall seeing whether M030 US and stock suspensions used the same shock or not.
#6
BUt not everyone got MO30. Turbos and C4S and C2S had it standard i think. I replced my ROW suspension to ROW ero stuuf and it was great. I then went to a crazy track only set
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Greg Fishman
C2S's did not have the M030 as std, don't think the C4S did either.
I think you are correct. I saw M030 on the options list for my C4S. Problem is it's the US version with US height as others have correctly pointed out. I'm going through the threads and links to see just what exactly are the differences between ROW and US M030, other than height of course.
#9
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by autobonrun
I think you are correct. I saw M030 on the options list for my C4S. Problem is it's the US version with US height as others have correctly pointed out. I'm going through the threads and links to see just what exactly are the differences between ROW and US M030, other than height of course.
To bad Viken isn't around any longer. He would straighten this out for us!
#10
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Greg Fishman
All US suspensions were the same ride height.
Do a search on your questions and you will see the different specs. Also check out www.p-car.com and www.carnewal.com
Do a search on your questions and you will see the different specs. Also check out www.p-car.com and www.carnewal.com
http://p-car.com/susfaq.html
#11
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
He wasn't called a guru for nothing
Per Viken, "All the US specification 993s came with 2 different suspension options. The standard M032 setup and the optional M030 sport chassis. You will have to look at your car's option sticker to see if it came with the sports chassis M030. The M030 option was only offered on the Coupe models including the Carrera S and Carrera 4S. The 993 Turbo already had the M030 sport chassis with the exception of a slightly firmer rear spring to compensate for the heavier rear weight. The M030 sport chassis option included firmer shocks and springs and slightly thicker anti-roll bars. There were some slight anti-roll bar differences between narrow and wide body cars as well. The ride height of all US 993 cars were the same regardless of suspension setup. The US cars were approximately 20 mm higher in front and 10 mm higher at rear than the standard ROW (rest of world) cars. On the other hand, all US cars were approximately 30 mm higher all around than the ROW M030 equipped cars. A US car equipped with the factory M030 chassis could be retrofitted with the ROW M030 springs for a 30 mm lower ride height without having to change the shocks."
Per Viken, "All the US specification 993s came with 2 different suspension options. The standard M032 setup and the optional M030 sport chassis. You will have to look at your car's option sticker to see if it came with the sports chassis M030. The M030 option was only offered on the Coupe models including the Carrera S and Carrera 4S. The 993 Turbo already had the M030 sport chassis with the exception of a slightly firmer rear spring to compensate for the heavier rear weight. The M030 sport chassis option included firmer shocks and springs and slightly thicker anti-roll bars. There were some slight anti-roll bar differences between narrow and wide body cars as well. The ride height of all US 993 cars were the same regardless of suspension setup. The US cars were approximately 20 mm higher in front and 10 mm higher at rear than the standard ROW (rest of world) cars. On the other hand, all US cars were approximately 30 mm higher all around than the ROW M030 equipped cars. A US car equipped with the factory M030 chassis could be retrofitted with the ROW M030 springs for a 30 mm lower ride height without having to change the shocks."
#12
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Greg Fishman
To bad Viken isn't around any longer. He would straighten this out for us!
#13
Race Director
Originally Posted by autobonrun
You were on the money. The second paragraph explained it all. So if my shocks were in good shape (and that's a big if after 55k miles) all I would need to do to get to ROW specs would be to change the springs. However, I think the smart thing will be to do both shocks and springs given the mileage.
http://p-car.com/susfaq.html
http://p-car.com/susfaq.html
At 55k mi. don't waste the effort of replacing the springs w/o replacing the shocks too. Just my .02.
#14
Originally Posted by 993BillW
At 55k mi. don't waste the effort of replacing the springs w/o replacing the shocks too. Just my .02.
#15
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I'm convinced. ROW it is.
I've managed to stay off the slippery slope for an entire year but I'll make plans to order the ROW springs with the Bilstein HD shocks. Not bad for a 10 year old car only having the oil and tires changed since I brought it home last September. Probably waiting for the dollar to strengthen against the Euro is a wasted exercise but I'll see what happens. I've got some time. It's not like my shocks are completely gone but I am fed up with the SUV look.
My problem is that the slope for my M5 is as slippery as the one for the 993. I just ordered a new set of Chrome Shadow OEM rims for it and was trying to get a Tubi exhaust for it as well. I think I'll have to go with the 993 suspension upgrade first and let the M5 exhaust wait.
Thanks for the input by the way.
My problem is that the slope for my M5 is as slippery as the one for the 993. I just ordered a new set of Chrome Shadow OEM rims for it and was trying to get a Tubi exhaust for it as well. I think I'll have to go with the 993 suspension upgrade first and let the M5 exhaust wait.
Thanks for the input by the way.