Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Questions on M030 sport setup.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2005, 07:31 PM
  #16  
kkim
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
kkim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kauai, Hawaii
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray Calvo
Oh yeah - and don't whine for free instructions. Go out and buy a shop manual.
As Ray says, a shop manual is invaluable. Consider yourself lucky he put a smiley face thing in his post.

As a guide for you to see what's involved, take a look at this DIY on suspension installation.

http://p-car.com/diy/sus/

good luck
Old 11-11-2005, 10:13 PM
  #17  
Dudley
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dudley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shrewsbury MA
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Autobonrun - Thanks but I am all done with jacks - just bought a scissors lift

BTW there are a lot of us running ROW 030 springs and sways with the Bilstein HDs. Gert has the Bilsteins with the extra threads cut for lowering but Bilstein may also offer them in the US by now.

Last edited by Dudley; 11-12-2005 at 08:29 AM.
Old 11-11-2005, 11:06 PM
  #18  
Baggerdude
Burning Brakes
 
Baggerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CT-Land
Posts: 967
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Auto....

If you run a search you will find tons of posts regarding just this question. I did and decided to choose Gert's HD Bilsteins and sways along with the new M030s. Plus, a bunch of photogs.

My shop spent a great deal of time hookin' all this stuff up cuz they had not done so before, but I gotta tell ya...... it is MUCH better than my stock setup.

My car is a 993 C4S.... had 26K miles on the clock when I bought it last August. I now have 32K on it. 4K on the new suspension.

The car has been transformed by the suspension.... it corners FLAT! and it rides very nice. I don't like a 'too firm' ride, and Gert's set up is perfect. I don't track the car... and don't plan to.

I love the look of the lower suspension set up did. That's one of the best points. My car sits at 25.25" at the inner corner of the fender roll both front and back. One of the best setting 993s I have seen. It sits FLAT!

BTW, I got Gert's front protection bar... but, I've had many low cars and I have not scraped this one once..... so far.

Get Gert's HD Bilsteins with the sways and the M030s.... then have the car 4 corner balanced. Makes all the difference. Then..... add a new exhaust.

BAGGER
Old 11-11-2005, 11:15 PM
  #19  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,732
Received 407 Likes on 258 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ray Calvo
Depends on your competency. If all you've ever done is empty the ashtrays and clean the windshield, then probably not. If you've done suspension work, brake rotor replacements, oil/filter changes, etc. before on other cars, you should be able to handle it. Shock/spring removal and installation isn't all that bad, but can take time. You shouldn't need any real special tools. Make sure you have a good shop that knows these cars where you can take it afterwards for a good suspension alignment and weight balancing; that's a must. I did the M030 change and later the PSS9 change myself; when I tried to do similar shock replacement work on my Audi A4 I found it more than I could handle due to bolt/nut clearances and needs for what appeared to be special tools.

Oh yeah - and don't whine for free instructions. Go out and buy a shop manual.
Actually, since about 1999 my tech experience has greatly improved. Access to the Porsche tech sites gave me the confidence to try a few repairs on my own. I changed out my SC's shocks, torsion bars (never again though), brakes, rotors, alternator and a few other straight forward jobs. I actually did a rebuild on my bmw740's transmission valve body that took about two days. So I guess I'm getting mechanically inclined.

Kkim, thanks for the p-car link. It gives a good overview of what's involved and it's something I probably will tackle. I just did a cursory look at the rears and see I will need to remove the air intake box to access that shock tower. I can't believe I haven't had my car a whole month before planning a modification

Bagger, I'll contact Gert on Monday. Since I have the US M030 option now, I can probably get by with the current sways, but I'll definitely check on the Bilstein HDs and ROW springs. Dudley's advice about Gert's extra threads on their Bilsteins is priceless. I thoght they would all be the same regardless of supplier.

Several others have advised me to get the shop manual. I'll go ahead and spring for that right away. Can you recommend a good source?
Old 11-26-2005, 11:15 AM
  #20  
jimbo3
Rennlist Member
 
jimbo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,366
Likes: 0
Received 720 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

Bagger mentions that corner balancing is needed with the Bilstein HD/ RoW M030 spring set-up while Martin says that, with OEM RoW M030 shocks and springs, corner balancing isn't available. I take it that the spring perch on the OEM M030 is fixed? If so, wouldn't it be preferable to be able to adjust for corner balance? (Making Bilstein a better choice in that regard?) Can the HD simply be adjusted so that the spring perch is in the same relative location to the OEM RoW M030 shock (assuming the perch IS fixed) and skip the corner balance?

I'm leaning toward Gert's M030 RoW springs & sways w/ Bilstein HDs on a 96 C2 narrow body. I'm assuming that there is some adjustablility on the sways? Summarizing what to do after installation- corner balance, align to -1 camber (F&R) and kinematic toe. Sound about right for a street car that needs a lower appearance and better handling w/o damaging dental work? Any reccomendations on sways?

Just starting to get the hang of this topic and I want to be sure I'm going to be doing the right thing the FIRST time! (I only know enough to be dangerous...) Hopefully, any answers will help Autobonrun, too.

Thanks in advance for any advice/comments.
Old 11-26-2005, 01:25 PM
  #21  
Paul E. Dodd
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Paul E. Dodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 174
Received 28 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Jimbo-

You are correct regarding spring perches (fixed on M030, adjustable on Bilstein). However, I think you are incorrect on the swaybars. The M030 sways are bigger than standard, but are not adjustable. You need the RS sways (or others make them also) if you want adjustability. However, for a street car, adjustable swaybars are probably overkill and the M030's would be fine.

Many folks like the RS alignment specifications as shown in the factory manual. They are not crazy for a street-driven car.

Paul
Old 11-26-2005, 02:26 PM
  #22  
chris walrod
Guru
Lifetime Rennlist
Member


Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
chris walrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: yorba linda, ca
Posts: 15,744
Received 101 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

All front 993 dampers are adjustable for purposes of corner balancing. Its the rear thats fixed.
Old 11-27-2005, 11:37 AM
  #23  
jimbo3
Rennlist Member
 
jimbo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,366
Likes: 0
Received 720 Likes on 433 Posts
Default

Thanks, guys. Looks like the proper course of action is a full corner balance is needed no matter which direction one goes. A couple of follow-up questions that will hopefully help Autobonrun, too:
-If it's dropped about 1 to 1.5 inches, will bump steer start to become an issue? (If not, out of curiosity, at what point IS bump steer an issue?)
-A fairly reliable source at PCA suggests that the M030 sways are better on smooth pavement, but might not be as good as the basic stock sways on uneven and/or wet pavement- comments?? (Assuming HD's and RoW M030 springs.)
-Objective on alignment, particularily camber, is to take advantage of lowering with HD's and RoW M030 on the street while having reasonably good, even tire wear. RS specs are good for this app?

Thanks again!
Jim
Old 11-27-2005, 01:44 PM
  #24  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,732
Received 407 Likes on 258 Posts
Default Some email responses from Gert

Originally Posted by jimbo3
Thanks, guys. Looks like the proper course of action is a full corner balance is needed no matter which direction one goes. A couple of follow-up questions that will hopefully help Autobonrun, too:
-If it's dropped about 1 to 1.5 inches, will bump steer start to become an issue? (If not, out of curiosity, at what point IS bump steer an issue?)
-A fairly reliable source at PCA suggests that the M030 sways are better on smooth pavement, but might not be as good as the basic stock sways on uneven and/or wet pavement- comments?? (Assuming HD's and RoW M030 springs.)
-Objective on alignment, particularily camber, is to take advantage of lowering with HD's and RoW M030 on the street while having reasonably good, even tire wear. RS specs are good for this app?

Thanks again!
Jim
You're correct in that I had many of the same questions. I contacted Gert a couple weeks ago and got email responses. He was very helpful and I will definitely purchase from them when I ready to move forward. I already have the US M030 option with larger sway bars so I just need the springs and shocks. Here were my initial questions:

"What is the difference between the M030 ROW springs and the HR springs? With either I would want the Bilstein HD shocks with the longer threads.

Will lowering the car mean I need to adjust the steering rack setup?"

Here are his responses:

"The RoW M030 springs will make the ride slightly firmer than your US M030 setup.

The H&R springs will allow you to lower the car more and the ride will become more comfortable.

Since you have the M030 option, you already have the bigger swaybars.

You don’t need to change the steering rack if you lower it. On a 993, you only get bumpsteer once you lower 50mm or more.

Even then, some people don’t even notice it.

If you’re a sporty driver, I would change the shocks and springs into the RoW M030 with the extra threaded Bilstein HD shocks.

That will allow you to lower the car up to 40-45 mm from US stock height. The ride becomes slightly firmer but much better damped as the HD’s match these springs very well."


In my second email, I asked Gert the following questions:

1) Have you heard of not being able to get the car to align after lowering it?

2) If I go with your suggestion of the Bilstein HDs with the ROW springs, what alignment figures do people use: the ROW M030 alignment numbers?

3) Are there any rubber bump stops or other parts on top of my current shocks that will need to be reused with the new ones or do they come with instructions and everything needed to replace my current shocks in total?


And here was his response:

" With this kind of parts, you can always align the car.

When lowering 40mm, you can either go for the RoW M030 alignment or the alignment of the 993RS.

Most align according to the RS specs.

I can get you the alignment specs if needed.

The front shocks don’t have bump stops. The rear HD’s come with new bumpstops.

You need to re-use a lot of parts from the original suspension such as spring tops, front perches.

I have installation instructions available for this particular setup."
Old 11-28-2005, 07:07 AM
  #25  
Dudley
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dudley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shrewsbury MA
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Unless you are building a track car, I would suggest you go no lower than RoW M030. You may find the RS height a bit too low for the street.



Quick Reply: Questions on M030 sport setup.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:09 AM.