Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

C2 v C4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 05:04 PM
  #1  
William Green's Avatar
William Green
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Edinburgh
Default C2 v C4

Tried doing a search but the words are too short.

I have found myself back in the market for another 993 rather sooner than expected after an Audi TT took a dislike to my car

After searching around for a replacement have dug up a couple of C4's that I had not previously considered when buying my last car. I know all the arguments for and against four wheel drive in the 964, but does this carry over into the 993?

Taking cost and condition out of the equation is one car better than the other?

Thanks,

William
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #2  
DJF1's Avatar
DJF1
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,116
Likes: 68
From: Burlington CANADA
Default

Originally Posted by William Green

Taking cost and condition out of the equation is one car better than the other?

Thanks,

William
Better in what way? What exactly are you looking for? If you want a winter/snow driver I suppose the C4 will be a better ticket than a C2. At any rate If I wanted a daily driver I would be looking at a C4 to be covered in all aspects. On track though the C2 is a better proposition in my book.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #3  
vjd3's Avatar
vjd3
Addict
Rennlist Member

20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,129
Likes: 21
From: Boston
Default

Personally, I prefer the C4 overall -- and I've owned several of each. In dry conditions, the cars feel pretty much indentical ... because they are, with only 4 percent of the traction going to the front wheels unless there's traction loss at the rear. But in the wet or the snow, the C4 definitely feels more glued to the road. Plus, you get limited slip and ADB standard.

But on the track, I can see where the C2 might be preferred for the traditional 911 experience.

Vic
95 C4 cab
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 05:44 PM
  #4  
woodcock's Avatar
woodcock
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Frankfurt, Germany
Default

To be honest, I think far too much fuss is made about the wet/snow grip levels of a C4 over the C2. I have found that both 993's grip surprisingly well in those conditions, given the superior traction due to the rear engine/rear wheel drive concept. Many standard BMW's struggle alot more, with their front engine/rear wheel drive setup.

If, however, the conditions are really rough, then your 993 is simply not going to make it, and the rear end will catch you up sooner than you can react - be it a C4 or C2.

Not quite so on the track. Here, a C4 gives you more leeway until the rear breaks away. But if and when it does, it's unforgiving, and very difficult to control. In a C2, the drift will come earlier, but the car gives you more time to control it and bring the rear back. Which I guess is why drift experts always favour C2's, 'cos a controlled drift is easier.

My impression is you will notice the difference between a C2 and C4 on track, but not in everyday use - which is probably exactly the opposite of why people would choose a C4 to begin with!

My views!

woodcock
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
H. Miller's Avatar
H. Miller
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Default

Owned both. Prefer C2 for lighter weight feel and much more enjoyable at the track. To each his own.
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:27 PM.