Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

finally in with pictures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2004, 12:21 AM
  #31  
Steve 96C4S
Rennlist Member
 
Steve 96C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, MD.
Posts: 6,595
Received 869 Likes on 440 Posts
Default

Nice wheels and car! The only thing I'd ad is to dump the amber corners and go with front clear corners - cheap, too! I think mine were around $125 from AJ USA. I would echo the others and get rid of the basket handle rear brake light and upgrade to the 96 style rear integrated light.

Sweet ride.
Here's the clear corners - much cheaper than removing the bumperettes and going to the turbo front lights. I like my cute little bumperettes anyway.



Steve
Old 03-24-2004, 12:29 AM
  #32  
mimmo
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: wilton ct
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the advice steve, i think i am going to get rid of the basket handle 3rd brake light but im waiting to deside on which front splitters to install first so i can do the everything at once in the body shop.
And you're right about the bumperettes they are cute and im going to install the clear corner lights as well, thanks again for the link.
Old 03-24-2004, 12:49 AM
  #33  
csertich
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
csertich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 3,087
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Very nice car. Really like the wheels. Congratulations!

The front splitters on my car in my avatar are from the factory Aerokit I package.

chuck
Old 03-24-2004, 02:22 AM
  #34  
DJF1
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
DJF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Burlington CANADA
Posts: 7,115
Received 65 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Congrats on the car! It looks really sweet!
Please don't take my post in a negative way but don't think too much of your dyno run... I had a dyno run on my 1995 cabrio 2 years ago and I got 263HP at the rear wheels according to the dyno. Did a few runs with the stock airbox and the motorsound and the max HP was achived completely stock. Did not really believe the results but hey that is what the dyno said.
There have been many threads in the past evaluating mods such as yours with also some of the products you have installed and there are not significant gains to be had.
Having said that if you are happy with the mods ,which looks you are, enjoy them, the car and welcome to the board!
Old 03-24-2004, 06:56 AM
  #35  
Monique
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Monique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

ArrrGh!

319 HP! Why did we spend the extra loot on an original RS when you get results like this with a US chip.

Welcome
Attached Images  
Old 03-24-2004, 08:41 AM
  #36  
Evan
Burning Brakes
 
Evan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Goshen, CT
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mimmo,

Here's the only pic of the back I have. It's kinda small so i don't know how this is going to come out. Most other pics need to be scanned in and I have no scanner.
Attached Images  
Old 03-24-2004, 12:04 PM
  #37  
mimmo
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: wilton ct
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im sorry if i was misleading but the horsepower i was posting is to the flywheel 319 HP minus the 17% loss factor is 265 HP to the wheels.
I understand Its hard to belive some numbers sometimes, but when you have one of the best tuners in the north east working on your car and he Knows what hes doing, its hard to question what he does and the proof of a brand new dynapack 5000, with 9 straight runs with the same results give or take 1-2 HP. If any one has heard of Jimmy Kakaletris in CT he had one of the fastest 964's (street legal) in the country, pushing 1100 HP with a 1/4 mile time of 9.5 sec's @ 167.0 MPH
Old 03-24-2004, 12:14 PM
  #38  
ksjcorpus
Instructor
 
ksjcorpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mimmo don't apologize ........... what you're seeing here, with me also, is some skepticism and some jealousy all mixed in. we're all glad you posted that number of 319 and it may very well be accurate and it'll make us think out of the box.
Old 03-24-2004, 07:26 PM
  #39  
mimmo
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: wilton ct
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks guys i like to see that you guys are for real, and i enjoy the honesty think you for welcoming me aboard
Old 03-24-2004, 08:01 PM
  #40  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Yes, welcome aboard, and sweet ride!

Now for the jealousy and skepticism part of the post: did they do a "before" run? If so, then according to your calcs, they should have found 226 hp at the wheels (272 less 17%). If not, then it makes the 319 hp number rather more questionable.
Old 03-24-2004, 10:10 PM
  #41  
mimmo
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: wilton ct
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i will try to post actual print outs this week
of before and after



Quick Reply: finally in with pictures



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:26 PM.