Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RS Clutch and LW Flywheel on a C$

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2003, 11:23 PM
  #1  
JohnG
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
JohnG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Great Falls, VA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RS Clutch and LW Flywheel on a C$

I have seen a lot of comments (mostly positive) on the benefits of the RS clutch and LW flywheel. One somewhat negative comment I have heard is that the lower mass is somewhat of a negative on the heavier AWD system. Has anyone experienced this? Any thoughts or suggestions on a good clutch/flywheel replacement for a '97 C4 Cab would be much appreciated. Thanks
Old 12-01-2003, 11:29 PM
  #2  
Phil
Phlat Black Guru
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
- Times 2

 
Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back In RI...............
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

hmmmm,
I have a 98 awd car
Where did you get your thoughts from?

I have had no problems...granted my car is stock, but I did have the rs clutch/flywheel.....for my own sake....."negative on the heavier AWD system"....huh??
Your car will rev quicker....it will also make some noise

Is that all your thinking of doing?
Old 12-02-2003, 12:03 AM
  #3  
adsc4s
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
adsc4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Phil,
Can I see the definition of "stock" in your Websters dictionary?!
Addison
Old 12-02-2003, 12:08 AM
  #4  
Phil
Phlat Black Guru
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
- Times 2

 
Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back In RI...............
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

GO to www.websters.com
look under stock ...cars....and Poof...My car show's up!

really!
Old 12-02-2003, 12:58 AM
  #5  
Jim
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Don't see how...

A lighter weight, faster responding engine could ever be a downside. I just put one on my C4S, and I love it. The old flywheel/clutch is a very heavy part, as it must be to spin such a high-compression engine.

Do it, you will not regret it. Unless, of course, you want it to remain in a "stock" class..
Old 12-02-2003, 01:52 AM
  #6  
Carrera GT
Wordsmith
Rennlist Member
 
Carrera GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,623
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Sachs has some new hardware. Worth considering. Maybe search 993 and 993 Turbo archives.
Old 12-02-2003, 12:25 PM
  #7  
JohnG
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
JohnG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Great Falls, VA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default More Upgrades

Thanks for all of the responses, I am new to this forum. To answer Phil's question, I just got the car and am definately looking for good bang-for-the-buck upgrades to do ( I know it is a slippery slope and I just asked for a push...). The major stuff like the clutch I am planning on doing when the original needs to be replaced. I do think in the near future that the front brake rotors are going to need replacing, so not sure what to do there. Don't think I want to spend the $1500parts + labor to do the Big Reds, but wouldn't mind spending a little more than the stock upgrade to get a little more. Was also thinking of opening up the airbox. I have the motorsound option, but it sounds like the small airholes don't do a whole lot. Have seen some covers where it looks like it is just a frame and the filter is pretty exposed (guess I would do a K&N filter too unless there is a better suggestion). Also, does it make sense to "chip" it when you start messing with the air intake?
Old 12-02-2003, 02:12 PM
  #8  
Laura
Pro
 
Laura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Addison,

That "stock" comment from Phil just jumped right out, didn't it?

And then the invitation to join the "Slippery Slope Club" with this:

Is that all your thinking of doing?


GEEZ Phil !!
Old 12-02-2003, 02:58 PM
  #9  
Tech-Law
Pro
 
Tech-Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think the K&N gets you anything except for a lighter wallet.

Steve Weiner's chips are highly regarded.

Drilling the motorsound airbox will probably just get you a little more induction noise but not much else.

Clutch and flywheel and re-gearing seem to be the best bang for the $.

Good luck.
Old 12-02-2003, 08:54 PM
  #10  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Hi John:

LOL,...."Just Do It",........

The RS LWF kit is a major improvement in performance and durability by eliminating the somewhat troublesome dual-mass flywheel. We also use the GT-2 clutch for an even better setup for the folks who track their cars.

If you have the budget, nothing makes a bigger difference in acceleration as a set of close-ratio gears. Its akin to adding 50 HP to the performance of the car and is a much better bang-for-the-buck as a 3.8 kit.

I like our chips, too,.......
Old 12-03-2003, 08:57 AM
  #11  
Caveman
Rennlist Member
 
Caveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bucks, England
Posts: 3,276
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Question

Hi Steve,

How heavy is the RS clutch/flywheel compared to the standard one to operate. My wife is quite small and I'm wondering if this would, unfortunately, stop her from being able to drive the car?

Thanks,

David
Old 12-03-2003, 09:50 AM
  #12  
Fred R. C4S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Fred R. C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Georgetown, TX
Posts: 1,429
Received 90 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Caveman,

I made the switch to a LWF / RS clutch on my '97 C4S. No noticeable change in pedal effort. If fact, when new, I think the clutch effort is less than as the clutch wears. May be just my imagination. But your wife will have no trouble with the RS clutch.

Cheers,
Old 12-03-2003, 04:18 PM
  #13  
SMB993TT
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
SMB993TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the RS clutch and LWF on my car for about a year with no problems either with pedal effort (turbos have clutch assist), idle or noise. I would highly recommend this upgrade if you have to change the stock clutch.
Old 12-03-2003, 04:42 PM
  #14  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Hi David:

Since the clutch is hydraulically actuated and the clamping pressure is not appreciably changed, I think your wife will not have any problems with the RS LWF setup.
Old 12-04-2003, 05:02 AM
  #15  
Caveman
Rennlist Member
 
Caveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bucks, England
Posts: 3,276
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Thanks for your input. Another one for my list...


Quick Reply: RS Clutch and LW Flywheel on a C$



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:26 AM.