Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Roast 992.2 development team

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2024, 06:14 PM
  #16  
2thHappy
Rennlist Member
 
2thHappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Needham, MA
Posts: 250
Received 92 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

But Porsche left the razor? This was a missed opportunity.
The following 4 users liked this post by 2thHappy:
AF330i (05-30-2024), BED997 (05-29-2024), Porsche911GTS'16 (05-29-2024), soguinness (05-29-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 06:17 PM
  #17  
gellie
Rennlist Member
 
gellie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,135
Received 252 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

IDK. Getting very use to the razor.
The following 5 users liked this post by gellie:
Autobacs (05-29-2024), Jeff Whitten (05-29-2024), Nein Eleven (05-31-2024), por356 (05-30-2024), suffer (05-29-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 06:23 PM
  #18  
VarTheVar
Rennlist Member
 
VarTheVar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 705
Received 674 Likes on 314 Posts
Default

I give them props for doing the work they did. It was a ton of work and the car is super high tech. People will be lining up to buy it. That's a success for Porsche. I would never buy it but that's my own problem
Old 05-29-2024, 06:52 PM
  #19  
jhardy
Racer
 
jhardy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 276
Received 125 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Design changes: thumbs down on removing analog tach; exterior changes seem to fall into category of "had to change stuff" vs. improvements. The base Carerra looks "GT3 Touring lite"; I love the curves of the 992.1 and the rear changes in particular reduced them. The front looks strange to me - the upper lip of the bumper looks awkward and the intakes are too big. The new rear light bar looks too fat to me. The engine cover looks too busy vs. the subtly retro design of the 992.1. Pricing is too high. Base performance is barely up and Porsche is making a big deal about the bigger turbos but that's just an emissions thing. Referencing the "only" 50kg weight gain of the GTS without mentioning that doesn't include backseats is funny. The 911 is getting too expensive. I guess the price increases help out residual values on 992.1s.

All that said, there will be a line out the door to buy these.
The following 5 users liked this post by jhardy:
Autobacs (05-29-2024), bboerit (05-30-2024), Bluehighways (05-30-2024), GuardsRed992 (05-29-2024), incoming992s (05-30-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 09:35 PM
  #20  
GuardsRed992
Instructor
 
GuardsRed992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 150
Received 91 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike818
On the plus side, the base / T* could have some excellent tuning potential.

*if they make it.
I would think that the new Base will have as much power as the old GTS if tuned correctly
Old 05-29-2024, 09:35 PM
  #21  
John Mclane
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
John Mclane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,875
Received 1,366 Likes on 745 Posts
Default

I care for the tech allowing ICE to live another decade, but the noise on the GTS is plain sad. Aftermarket muffler and particulate filter might not even be feasible considering how they are mounted and monitored.
The following 2 users liked this post by John Mclane:
Autobacs (05-29-2024), Fullyield (05-30-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 10:11 PM
  #22  
mcacs1
Instructor
 
mcacs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Montreal
Posts: 172
Received 116 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GuardsRed992
I would think that the new Base will have as much power as the old GTS if tuned correctly
The 992.1 Base does already.
The following 4 users liked this post by mcacs1:
catdog2 (05-30-2024), GuardsRed992 (05-30-2024), Kansas32 (05-30-2024), Nein Eleven (05-31-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 10:35 PM
  #23  
tna3
Instructor
 
tna3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 248
Received 133 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike818
the only non bean counter / pure greed reason I can think of eliminating the switch is they have taken start/stop to a new level with the hybrid and a switch would give a false sense that an engine should start when you turn it.

but then again, it's an across the board change even with the non-hybrids isn't it? So greed seems like the most likely reason.
I agree with you on this. The twist motion to start the engine is synonymous to "cranking the engine", but with the move to hybrid Porsche makes the statement that it's an instant 400V jolt. Then they decided not to make separate methods for hybrid vs non. However, I see no reason to keep the button on the left. Just come clean and break with the heritage at this point, there was no hybrids back when Porsche started racing.
Old 05-29-2024, 10:37 PM
  #24  
Autobacs
Racer
 
Autobacs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 368
Received 160 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

What a good thread to start.
Rims make or break the car and the new rims do not look appealing at all..
The car is 911 smooth and rounded....then you look at what they did with the front and rear bumpers and started introducing some squareness and now it has hints of a Taycan...not good

Last edited by Autobacs; 05-29-2024 at 11:11 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Autobacs:
bboerit (05-30-2024), NEH51 (05-29-2024), Onami (05-29-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 10:53 PM
  #25  
dudeoverthere
Burning Brakes
 
dudeoverthere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 770
Received 631 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Why Did Porsche Switch To A Start Button?

What drove this change? According to Wiesmann, with the Taycan and Cayenne moving towards the starter button, the same was implemented in the new 911 to maintain some form of familiarity:

“The starter button is an integral part of the new Porsche Driver Experience cockpit layout, which has also been previously introduced on other new models such as the latest Panamera and Cayenne variants,” said Wiesmann. “For many of our customers who own several of our vehicles, familiarity and consistency between different models is important, so the layout is similar.”

https://www.carscoops.com/2024/05/po...her-surprises/

Old 05-29-2024, 11:10 PM
  #26  
aggie57
Rennlist Member
 
aggie57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,288
Received 2,842 Likes on 1,494 Posts
Default

On things like the digital tach and the start button, the design team often doesn’t have much say. They’re told to use parts common to other VW group models; thats why the 911 specific window switches on 997 and before were replaced by the generic armrest style ones. I’d hazard a guess it’s the same here.
The following users liked this post:
Bluehighways (05-30-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 11:18 PM
  #27  
ClassJ
Rennlist Member
 
ClassJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,123
Received 286 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

It’s just bad design choices. Some of this is driven by market pressure.

I won’t pretend to understand the complexity of powertrain emission standards but this application of Hybrid tech seems worthless unless you are into that sort of stuff.

It’s becoming more apparent that my 991.2 T might be my last new Porsche for a while.

Usually I like the .2 variant much more than the .1 versions. In this case I really don’t see it yet.

Old 05-29-2024, 11:22 PM
  #28  
John Mclane
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
John Mclane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,875
Received 1,366 Likes on 745 Posts
Default

Those things are to simplify the lineup to increase profit margins. This thing clients want all the same is a nice excuse. Saving cash is more realistic.
The following 2 users liked this post by John Mclane:
bboerit (05-30-2024), incoming992s (05-30-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 11:40 PM
  #29  
AlexCeres
Rennlist Member
 
AlexCeres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,849
Received 1,662 Likes on 1,019 Posts
Default

So much griping. The engineering team did a fantastic job. The eturbo design is quite trick. The pancake in the transmission is following the McLaren and Ferrari example, but at a much lower price point. No, they didn’t invent cold fusion. But they did some extremely nice work on the packaging and efficiency and a lot of micro-optimizations. The 11Kw regen in leu of the wastegate ? Nice.

Do I want to buy *this* car ? No, but I was never in the market for a gts. Do I want to see this work extended into a TTS and 2RS ? **** yes, yes I do.
The following 4 users liked this post by AlexCeres:
Risky_Business (05-29-2024), Scrappy1972 (05-30-2024), UncleDude (05-30-2024), wdr911 (05-30-2024)
Old 05-29-2024, 11:43 PM
  #30  
AlexCeres
Rennlist Member
 
AlexCeres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,849
Received 1,662 Likes on 1,019 Posts
Default

This generation’s gts is more bad *** than last generation’s turbo, and is much much faster than a gt3 on public roads. It is a worthy successor to the 992.1 gts.


Quick Reply: Roast 992.2 development team



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:52 PM.