Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Touch Screen vs Buttons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2024, 04:59 PM
  #1  
Denny Swift
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Denny Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: PA
Posts: 1,738
Received 1,586 Likes on 670 Posts
Default Touch Screen vs Buttons

I wonder if/how these new "guidelines" will work in the 992.2. IMO, the PCM in the 992.1 is a complete disaster. And that's not hyperbole. It's so complex, buggy and layered that it's not possible to operate it safely while driving (not possible for me, anyway). Frankly, I don't understand how non-911 tolerate it. In the sports cars, we tolerate it because the cars are great to drive. But who would put up with it in a family hauler? The interior on my Spyder is simple and great. Frankly, my 992 just doesn't give me the same pleasure. Not even close because the PCM in the 992 is just such a mess. I shouldn't have to make excuses for the 992, but i do. If you search, you'll find that Taycan, Macan, Panamera, and Cayenne owners all have PCM frustration. But, these new "rules" are only guidelines so, Porsche is unlikely to do anything. The .2 is probably already finished. It's just so absurd that a car that is the very essence of driving engagement requires significantly more eyes-off-the-road time than any vehicle I've ever experienced.

Spoiler up? Give me a button. A.S.S. off? Give me a button. Rev match, change music source, open garage door? Give me a button. Even the dial for Sport/S+ is stupid IMO. I'd much rather have a button on the console. It will be interesting to see what Porsche does with the .2. My guess is that it will be even worse.


https://www.motortrend.com/news/new-car-interior-touchscreen-euro-ncap-safety-testing/
Old 03-06-2024, 06:29 PM
  #2  
CanAutM3
Three Wheelin'
 
CanAutM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,590
Received 1,329 Likes on 622 Posts
Default

You can customize your PCM home screen to include most of the “buttons” you mention…
The following 3 users liked this post by CanAutM3:
aggie57 (03-06-2024), tomtomtomtom (03-06-2024), Zoomnbyu (03-06-2024)
Old 03-06-2024, 06:31 PM
  #3  
mattchow
Rennlist Member
 
mattchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 654
Received 390 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

install an exhaust and downpipes, turn off all the bs and just drive.
The following 3 users liked this post by mattchow:
Fullyield (03-07-2024), jhenson29 (03-06-2024), Tedster (03-07-2024)
Old 03-06-2024, 07:13 PM
  #4  
Johnauto
Racer
 
Johnauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 372
Received 91 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Swift
I wonder if/how these new "guidelines" will work in the 992.2. IMO, the PCM in the 992.1 is a complete disaster. And that's not hyperbole. It's so complex, buggy and layered that it's not possible to operate it safely while driving (not possible for me, anyway). Frankly, I don't understand how non-911 tolerate it. In the sports cars, we tolerate it because the cars are great to drive. But who would put up with it in a family hauler? The interior on my Spyder is simple and great. Frankly, my 992 just doesn't give me the same pleasure. Not even close because the PCM in the 992 is just such a mess. I shouldn't have to make excuses for the 992, but i do. If you search, you'll find that Taycan, Macan, Panamera, and Cayenne owners all have PCM frustration. But, these new "rules" are only guidelines so, Porsche is unlikely to do anything. The .2 is probably already finished. It's just so absurd that a car that is the very essence of driving engagement requires significantly more eyes-off-the-road time than any vehicle I've ever experienced.

Spoiler up? Give me a button. A.S.S. off? Give me a button. Rev match, change music source, open garage door? Give me a button. Even the dial for Sport/S+ is stupid IMO. I'd much rather have a button on the console. It will be interesting to see what Porsche does with the .2. My guess is that it will be even worse.


https://www.motortrend.com/news/new-...afety-testing/
992.2 will have 99% the same interior as the 992.1.

Old 03-06-2024, 07:23 PM
  #5  
shelbyking
Banned
 
shelbyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 409
Received 259 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mattchow
install an exhaust and downpipes, turn off all the bs and just drive.
Exactly, couldn't agree with you more. No reason for a HP sports car to be a sound studio and internet cafe on wheels. Ridiculous junk and some can't seem to live without it. Put your damn phone somewhere you can't see it while you are at it.
The following 5 users liked this post by shelbyking:
dg108 (03-07-2024), Fullyield (03-07-2024), mattchow (03-06-2024), Smirnoff67 (03-08-2024), Tedster (03-07-2024)
Old 03-07-2024, 12:09 AM
  #6  
jlegelis
Burning Brakes
 
jlegelis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 844
Received 780 Likes on 363 Posts
Default

I just boot to Carplay and spend almost 100% of my time there. I did the full screen Carplay update which makes it even better.. sure the PCM stuff is a necessary evil for certain things, but on a daily basis I'm almost never in there. I guess it depends on one's UI philosophy: button clutter for seldom used features vs. 'information hiding' and soft buttons depending on preferences. FWIW my garage door is configured to open with the 'joker' button on the steering wheel, while the button on the dash is configured for surround view which is a good combo. YMMV.
The following 3 users liked this post by jlegelis:
dcgator (03-07-2024), Tobeit (03-07-2024), vg247 (03-16-2024)
Old 03-07-2024, 01:40 AM
  #7  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,154
Received 6,478 Likes on 2,816 Posts
Default

Porsche doesn't want buttons because buttons aren't sexy. And it's probably cheaper not to have buttons.

PCM has never been good, I'm willing to bet the 992.2 PCM will suck as well. Honestly, Porsche ergonomics have always been screwed up - try to decipher the logic behind some of the hieroglyphics and button placement in an air cooled car. It's ridiculous. In the old cars it's charming because you can largely ignore it. That's hard to do in the newer ones.
The following users liked this post:
Denny Swift (03-07-2024)
Old 03-07-2024, 02:24 AM
  #8  
null
Rennlist Member
 
null's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Posts: 515
Received 467 Likes on 221 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Swift
I wonder if/how these new "guidelines" will work in the 992.2. IMO, the PCM in the 992.1 is a complete disaster. And that's not hyperbole. It's so complex, buggy and layered that it's not possible to operate it safely while driving (not possible for me, anyway). Frankly, I don't understand how non-911 tolerate it. In the sports cars, we tolerate it because the cars are great to drive. But who would put up with it in a family hauler? The interior on my Spyder is simple and great. Frankly, my 992 just doesn't give me the same pleasure. Not even close because the PCM in the 992 is just such a mess. I shouldn't have to make excuses for the 992, but i do. If you search, you'll find that Taycan, Macan, Panamera, and Cayenne owners all have PCM frustration. But, these new "rules" are only guidelines so, Porsche is unlikely to do anything. The .2 is probably already finished. It's just so absurd that a car that is the very essence of driving engagement requires significantly more eyes-off-the-road time than any vehicle I've ever experienced.

Spoiler up? Give me a button. A.S.S. off? Give me a button. Rev match, change music source, open garage door? Give me a button. Even the dial for Sport/S+ is stupid IMO. I'd much rather have a button on the console. It will be interesting to see what Porsche does with the .2. My guess is that it will be even worse.


https://www.motortrend.com/news/new-...afety-testing/
I'm with you on this.

The trend in car interface design sucks. It reminds me of the 90s when website designers started using Flash, and it was just Flash Flash Flash, for the sake of using Flash. The technology became an end in itself, and was abused until people finally realized there was no real reason to use it, and then it disappeared.

The whole touch screen craze / fad in automotive interface design needs to die. Physical controls like buttons, *****, and switches support muscle memory-based use, and allow drivers to control things without ever taking their eyes off the road. Sure, it makes sense to use screens / menus for certain things (putting the car into a service position, or clearing some faults, changing tire pressure readings, etc.), but the tail seems to be wagging the dog at this point, when it comes to digitization of driver / car interfaces...
Old 03-07-2024, 09:31 AM
  #9  
shelbyking
Banned
 
shelbyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 409
Received 259 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

I must be some kind of an odd ball outlier who has no need for the many layers and levels of all this whiz bang stuff in a car. You can actually live a perfectly normal life without an $8,000 stereo upgrade, apple car play, bluetooth everything, stock market alerts from your car, or being relentlessly bombarded with every kind of information imagineable.
A person who really has no need for any of that stuff like myself must be a real caveman in this "digital world".
The following 2 users liked this post by shelbyking:
Denny Swift (03-07-2024), Pc997 (03-07-2024)
Old 03-07-2024, 10:32 AM
  #10  
Staffie Guy
Three Wheelin'
 
Staffie Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 1,673
Received 1,414 Likes on 685 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shelbyking
Exactly, couldn't agree with you more. No reason for a HP sports car to be a sound studio and internet cafe on wheels. Ridiculous junk and some can't seem to live without it. Put your damn phone somewhere you can't see it while you are at it.
No reason why a HP sports car can't have a great sound system and other nice amenities for those of us who are not trying to wring out the last tenth of a second of speed.


The following 2 users liked this post by Staffie Guy:
CodyBigdog (03-07-2024), Guzzgreg (03-07-2024)
Old 03-07-2024, 10:36 AM
  #11  
CodyBigdog
Banned
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,026
Received 2,246 Likes on 1,275 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shelbyking
I must be some kind of an odd ball…..
.
👍
Old 03-07-2024, 10:37 AM
  #12  
CodyBigdog
Banned
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,026
Received 2,246 Likes on 1,275 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Staffie Guy
No reason why a HP sports car can't have a great sound system and other nice amenities for those of us who are not trying to wring out the last tenth of a second of speed.

Exactly.
The following users liked this post:
Guzzgreg (03-07-2024)
Old 03-07-2024, 10:46 AM
  #13  
brownan
Rennlist Member
 
brownan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC & Monkton, MD
Posts: 1,175
Received 207 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

While the 992 is cool, this is why 997 values will continue to climb...
The following users liked this post:
Denny Swift (03-07-2024)
Old 03-07-2024, 11:07 AM
  #14  
Denny Swift
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Denny Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: PA
Posts: 1,738
Received 1,586 Likes on 670 Posts
Default

Evidently I’m not the only Luddite.

https://www.thedrive.com/tech/39304/...-hazardous-fad

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/featu...out-of-control

https://www.ala.co.uk/connect/in-car...r-drug-driving

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/202...reasingly-nope

https://jalopnik.com/touchscreens-in...ure-1833553621

https://www.lifewire.com/phone-apps-...creens-7564478

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/fea...ll-using-them/

https://www.makeuseof.com/car-touchscreens-bad-idea/

https://futurism.com/the-byte/car-to...s-buttons-back

https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics...to-safely-use/

https://www.hagerty.com/media/maintenance-and-tech/why-touchscreens-are-infecting-everything/

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a40949962/car-buttons-easier-than-touchscreens-study/


https://www.economist.com/science-an...ing-distracted

https://www.auto123.com/en/news/touc...driving/69529/

https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/to...eep-my-buttons

https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-...n-touchscreens

https://www.farrin.com/blog/technolo...g-on-the-rise/

http://www.drivingandlife.com/2020/0...s-by-john.html

https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/o...-are-a-menace/



Last edited by Denny Swift; 03-07-2024 at 11:15 AM.
Old 03-07-2024, 11:45 AM
  #15  
CodyBigdog
Banned
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,026
Received 2,246 Likes on 1,275 Posts
Default

The media are like hungry sharks…always looking for something to feast on. Name a topic…any topic…and guarantee there are plenty of articles on the topic.
The following 2 users liked this post by CodyBigdog:
aggie57 (03-07-2024), BaxterPup (03-07-2024)


Quick Reply: Touch Screen vs Buttons



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:40 PM.