Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

This is why you need a GTS over a T

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2023, 12:04 PM
  #61  
bluelines1974
Rennlist Member
 
bluelines1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 622
Received 402 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CodyBigdog
Way too early to make that comparison to either Rivian or Lucid. Not to mention that when tesla first came on the scene, Tesla had no EV competition. Just from hybrids. Today, new and emerging EV’s have to operate under a totally different business model than when Tesla was emerging.

Musk became CEO of tesla in October 2008. Tesla did not have it’s first profitable year until 2020. Or 12 years later.
I'm not talking about net income, but gross margins. The Model S had positive gross margins essentially from day one in 2013 (over 20% by the end of 2013), and it was the car that made EVs mainstream in North America. Each Lucid costs about $370k to make (i.e. the direct input costs) and sells on average for $140k. It is an epic train wreck of a business compared to Tesla. Yes, Tesla had the luxury of being the only real game in town, so they could offer a relatively expensive car with a relatively cheap interior, but that doesn't account for the disastrous economics of Lucid. It only survives at the whim of the Saudi backers. Rivian is not quite as bad, but it still costs them $235k to make each R1T / R1S.
Old 12-02-2023, 12:33 PM
  #62  
CodyBigdog
Race Car
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,013
Received 2,228 Likes on 1,262 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bluelines1974
I'm not talking about net income, but gross margins. The Model S had positive gross margins essentially from day one in 2013 (over 20% by the end of 2013), and it was the car that made EVs mainstream in North America.
In reverse order - Not sure the Model S made EV’s “mainstream” in NA. Not sure EV’s, in totality, are even close to being mainstream in NA. Not yet. The Model S is priced high enough that most buyers are looking for cheaper EV’s…probably why I see few Model S on the road where I live on the east Coast? But this is a side issue.

At the beginning, before there was any other EV competitors, Tesla’s COGS were low. Having non-union production helps keep costs low, and now that they are high volume manufacturer, no doubt Tesla has significant leverage with suppliers and how much they charge Tesla. Then, as already mentioned, the quality of materials and workmanship are sub-par for a premium brand. There’s a number of variables in determining the Gross Margin, and without access to the specific data from each manufacturer, I can only speculate as to why one manufacturer has lower costs. But i also know that carbon and other regulatory credits helped Tesla improve their Gross Margin.

https://stockdividendscreener.com/au...scal%20quarter.

Last edited by CodyBigdog; 12-02-2023 at 12:44 PM.
Old 12-02-2023, 12:35 PM
  #63  
PorscheObsessed
Racer
 
PorscheObsessed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Northwest OH
Posts: 288
Received 219 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bluelines1974
I'm not talking about net income, but gross margins. The Model S had positive gross margins essentially from day one in 2013 (over 20% by the end of 2013), and it was the car that made EVs mainstream in North America. Each Lucid costs about $370k to make (i.e. the direct input costs) and sells on average for $140k. It is an epic train wreck of a business compared to Tesla. Yes, Tesla had the luxury of being the only real game in town, so they could offer a relatively expensive car with a relatively cheap interior, but that doesn't account for the disastrous economics of Lucid. It only survives at the whim of the Saudi backers. Rivian is not quite as bad, but it still costs them $235k to make each R1T / R1S.
The thing about Gross margins is that you can’t buy groceries with it. Only operating margins gets you there. That being said, the whole discussion about Rivian and Lucid is about pre scale economics. Rivian can be profitable, Lucid needs different models besides luxury sedans. A strategic mistake on Lucid’s part that they didn’t lead with the Gravity first.
Lucid chassis and suspension tuning might be better than the Taycan. That’s a remarkable feat for a first time manufacturer.
Old 12-02-2023, 12:41 PM
  #64  
CodyBigdog
Race Car
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,013
Received 2,228 Likes on 1,262 Posts
Default

IMO, it’s the consumers that ultimately benefit from have a wide diversity of different EV manufacturers. It helps keep prices down, and spurs innovation. God forbid that Tesla has a complete monopoly on EV’s. One reason why I am firmly against Tesla continuing to get tax payer subsidies, that ultimately, gives some of their cars a sales/pricing advantage.
Old 12-02-2023, 01:12 PM
  #65  
CodyBigdog
Race Car
 
CodyBigdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4,013
Received 2,228 Likes on 1,262 Posts
Default

Not to mention, and as far as tesla financial reporting - Tesla has been under several SEC investigations involving their financial/business accounting practices. Just one of the SEC complaints to the SEC:

The whistleblower complaint contained a number of allegations about Tesla’s financials and its business practices, including that it improperly categorized repairs for years and that it had poor control over internal systems used for capturing business data that ultimately rolls up to financial and other company disclosures to shareholders.”

Not saying that Musk/tesla did anything illegal, but when it come to anything Musk does, or says…I take it with a huge grain of salt before passing judgement. As I said a few times - Musk is a master of “gaming” the system….and I don’t believe that cooking the books to help inflate stock prices, would be out of the realm of possibilities. But who knows? I’m not a forensic accountant….but do know that Musk walks the line.

Last edited by CodyBigdog; 12-02-2023 at 01:53 PM.
Old 12-02-2023, 01:36 PM
  #66  
bluelines1974
Rennlist Member
 
bluelines1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 622
Received 402 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorscheObsessed
The thing about Gross margins is that you can’t buy groceries with it. Only operating margins gets you there. That being said, the whole discussion about Rivian and Lucid is about pre scale economics. Rivian can be profitable, Lucid needs different models besides luxury sedans. A strategic mistake on Lucid’s part that they didn’t lead with the Gravity first.
Lucid chassis and suspension tuning might be better than the Taycan. That’s a remarkable feat for a first time manufacturer.
Well if you can’t buy groceries with positive gross margins, you certainly can’t buy them with negative ones. And if the car costs 4x to make what you can sell it for, pretty soon you’re lining up at the food bank.

There is a reason that gross margins are a key metric for automakers, since they give you the potential for future profit and free cash flow.
Old 12-02-2023, 03:09 PM
  #67  
VarTheVar
Rennlist Member
 
VarTheVar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 710
Received 675 Likes on 314 Posts
Default

What happened to this thread ? I thought we were gonna dog GTS owners. I'm outta here
Old 12-02-2023, 06:25 PM
  #68  
aggie57
Rennlist Member
 
aggie57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,288
Received 2,842 Likes on 1,494 Posts
Default

Musk is scared sh….ss of the Chinese EV manufacturers, he says as much when interviewed. They are also heavily subsidized but have a bigger and more receptive home market, and are building small affordable cars that are right-sized for the world outside the US.
The following 2 users liked this post by aggie57:
CodyBigdog (12-02-2023), detansinn (12-02-2023)
Old 12-02-2023, 06:32 PM
  #69  
HappinessProcured
Racer
 
HappinessProcured's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 341
Received 190 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeftLane50mph
Even the diehard Tesla fans know it’s stupid to compare cybertruck to a low-trim 911
I think you're giving them too much credit.
The following 4 users liked this post by HappinessProcured:
CodyBigdog (12-02-2023), detansinn (12-02-2023), Diablo Dude (12-02-2023), Icegrill (12-03-2023)
Old 12-02-2023, 06:52 PM
  #70  
ali809
2nd Gear
 
ali809's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The 1/4 mile race looks staged



Last edited by ali809; 12-02-2023 at 07:03 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by ali809:
arinl (12-02-2023), detansinn (12-02-2023), Diablo Dude (12-02-2023), michaelp (12-02-2023), Zetta (12-04-2023)
Old 12-02-2023, 08:41 PM
  #71  
Mike818
Rennlist Member
 
Mike818's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: West Coast
Posts: 510
Received 337 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Tesla would never use deceitful marketing.
The following 3 users liked this post by Mike818:
aggie57 (12-03-2023), CodyBigdog (12-03-2023), michaelp (12-02-2023)
Old 12-03-2023, 07:20 PM
  #72  
dudeoverthere
Burning Brakes
 
dudeoverthere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 770
Received 631 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Looks like the 911 tied the 911.
Old 12-04-2023, 03:13 PM
  #73  
Jaye Bass
Burning Brakes
 
Jaye Bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: The Rocket City
Posts: 783
Received 272 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RRich
Not impressed by a soulless 8,000 lbs road destroying people killing cyber truck. Body count on this will be significant. Speed limit for these overweight EVs should be based on kinetic energy to limit the carnage.
Most EV bros have never owned a fast car until getting their EV with instant torque...now add in nearly 9000lbs of wet weight and you have multiple little disasters waiting to happen.



Quick Reply: This is why you need a GTS over a T



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:52 PM.