992.2: 3.0T Replaced by 4.0 N/A for Lesser models ?
#1
992.2: 3.0T Replaced by 4.0 N/A for Lesser models ?
Any potential insight or inner discussion about the changes to the motor ?
Is that twin turbo gem of a motor dying with the 992.1 generation ? Are only the "Turbo" cars going to be turbocharged?
Is that twin turbo gem of a motor dying with the 992.1 generation ? Are only the "Turbo" cars going to be turbocharged?
The following users liked this post:
ddelallata (01-27-2023)
Popular Reply
01-27-2023, 09:41 PM
Dropping the 718 4.0L engine in Carrera would make the car slower than the current Base Carrera. That engine makes less torque everywhere than the 3.0T with only a modest improvement in top end HP when you're rev'd up at 7k RPM. It's not a 9k RPM engine like the GT3, which incidentally, is a car that typically feels slower than the GTS on the street, unless you're somewhere in the GT3 that allows you to really open it up.
Taycan sales made the NA GT3 possible. Porsche is working hard to bring down its fleet CO2 numbers. The GT4RS is a send-off to the ICE 718. It's not a volume car and again, that engine was made possible by the Taycan sales numbers. Porsche put the NA 4.0L in the 718, because the 4 cylinder, intended to help sales in China and elsewhere, wasn't cutting it in the US. Nobody was buying that 4cyl 718 here and it's not like the 6cyl is hot seller either. It's all emissions and fuel economy math for Porsche. Another example? The Base Carrera doesn't get a manual transmission, because it's the volume 911 and that 8 speed PDK exists to elevate fuel economy numbers. Again, it's all about these numbers.
Frankly, I don't understand the obsession with NA motors. You don't see anyone wanting to go back to carburetors. Yes, the GT3 engine is awesome, but not every NA engine is awesome. Forced induction rocks -- better fuel economy, lower emissions, and more power everywhere with low end torque. Here's where we are going -- hybridization brings instant throttle response to the turbocharged cars. Nothing beats the throttle response of an electric motor. The hybrid/turbocharged future isn't a bad thing, that is... unless you prefer a wheezy NA engine struggling tor breathe at altitude on a mountain road.
Taycan sales made the NA GT3 possible. Porsche is working hard to bring down its fleet CO2 numbers. The GT4RS is a send-off to the ICE 718. It's not a volume car and again, that engine was made possible by the Taycan sales numbers. Porsche put the NA 4.0L in the 718, because the 4 cylinder, intended to help sales in China and elsewhere, wasn't cutting it in the US. Nobody was buying that 4cyl 718 here and it's not like the 6cyl is hot seller either. It's all emissions and fuel economy math for Porsche. Another example? The Base Carrera doesn't get a manual transmission, because it's the volume 911 and that 8 speed PDK exists to elevate fuel economy numbers. Again, it's all about these numbers.
Frankly, I don't understand the obsession with NA motors. You don't see anyone wanting to go back to carburetors. Yes, the GT3 engine is awesome, but not every NA engine is awesome. Forced induction rocks -- better fuel economy, lower emissions, and more power everywhere with low end torque. Here's where we are going -- hybridization brings instant throttle response to the turbocharged cars. Nothing beats the throttle response of an electric motor. The hybrid/turbocharged future isn't a bad thing, that is... unless you prefer a wheezy NA engine struggling tor breathe at altitude on a mountain road.
The following users liked this post:
detansinn (01-27-2023)
The following 5 users liked this post by adm63:
aggie57 (01-27-2023),
electricborn (01-28-2023),
toph4242 (02-09-2023),
tourenwagen (01-27-2023),
vancity (01-29-2023)
#4
Hahahah yes lol
Just saw it today
That being said that 4.0 N/A does seem to be under-utilized. All that investment for a motor that sold in a handful of 718 models. Seems wasteful to me. Sure its used in varying degrees, but wouldn't it seem logical to use that motor with the replacement car since 718 are now EV only soon?
So in my opinion it's highly likely....
Just saw it today
That being said that 4.0 N/A does seem to be under-utilized. All that investment for a motor that sold in a handful of 718 models. Seems wasteful to me. Sure its used in varying degrees, but wouldn't it seem logical to use that motor with the replacement car since 718 are now EV only soon?
So in my opinion it's highly likely....
The following 4 users liked this post by Staffie Guy:
#6
https://www.evo.co.uk/porsche/911/20...s-manuals-stay
not saying it can't change, article is from 2020 but seems it's not so simple as utilizing an existing motor.
Speaking at the reveal of the new 911 Targa, Walliser explained that despite the return of a naturally aspirated flat-six engine in the 718 Boxster and Cayman GTS models, which use a detuned version of the 4-litre GT4/Spyder engine, there was no possibility of this engine being offered in a 911 Carrera.‘The 4-litre engine in the GTS can’t be rotated through 180 degrees to fit in the 911. We will not see them again (naturally aspirated engines in the Carrera models). I’m sorry about that.
‘The R&D costs are too high to develop such an engine for the Carrera. And producing individual engines for different markets such as China, the US and Europe isn’t viable. The Carrera will always be turbocharged for the future.’
‘The R&D costs are too high to develop such an engine for the Carrera. And producing individual engines for different markets such as China, the US and Europe isn’t viable. The Carrera will always be turbocharged for the future.’
The following users liked this post:
zachr (01-27-2023)
#7
Hahahah yes lol
Just saw it today
That being said that 4.0 N/A does seem to be under-utilized. All that investment for a motor that sold in a handful of 718 models. Seems wasteful to me. Sure its used in varying degrees, but wouldn't it seem logical to use that motor with the replacement car since 718 are now EV only soon?
So in my opinion it's highly likely....
Just saw it today
That being said that 4.0 N/A does seem to be under-utilized. All that investment for a motor that sold in a handful of 718 models. Seems wasteful to me. Sure its used in varying degrees, but wouldn't it seem logical to use that motor with the replacement car since 718 are now EV only soon?
So in my opinion it's highly likely....
The following 2 users liked this post by 22992:
maschinetheist (01-28-2023),
Quikag (02-09-2023)
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Walliser said, and I've seen it repeated, that the 4.0 GTS 718 engine will not work in any manner in the 911 and they don't plan to go back to NA by redesigning from the ground up, not when they would still need a variant / evolution of the current engine for some markets to meet regulations.
The following 3 users liked this post by FORENN:
The following 3 users liked this post by 991.1 Guy:
The following 9 users liked this post by 22992:
asunnyhero (02-10-2023),
catdog2 (05-03-2023),
detansinn (01-27-2023),
electricborn (01-28-2023),
keebin (05-03-2023),
and 4 others liked this post.
#14
They said the same thing about putting the GT3 engine in the Cayman. Ultimately that GTS 4L is based on the turbo 3L. They can do it easily if they wanted to, they blow smoke all the time. I think it makes sense to offer a sort of consolation prize 992 for people that want a GT3 and cant get one. 420HP NA 4L manual 992 would be nice and who cares if its slower than the turbo cars, just make it the 992.2 T.
Last edited by chapmans; 01-27-2023 at 08:51 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by chapmans:
Cokerrat (01-27-2023),
Larson E. Rapp (05-02-2023),
Mcx (02-17-2023),
PLAY_HRD (02-08-2023),
timothymoffat (05-02-2023)
#15
Dropping the 718 4.0L engine in Carrera would make the car slower than the current Base Carrera. That engine makes less torque everywhere than the 3.0T with only a modest improvement in top end HP when you're rev'd up at 7k RPM. It's not a 9k RPM engine like the GT3, which incidentally, is a car that typically feels slower than the GTS on the street, unless you're somewhere in the GT3 that allows you to really open it up.
Taycan sales made the NA GT3 possible. Porsche is working hard to bring down its fleet CO2 numbers. The GT4RS is a send-off to the ICE 718. It's not a volume car and again, that engine was made possible by the Taycan sales numbers. Porsche put the NA 4.0L in the 718, because the 4 cylinder, intended to help sales in China and elsewhere, wasn't cutting it in the US. Nobody was buying that 4cyl 718 here and it's not like the 6cyl is hot seller either. It's all emissions and fuel economy math for Porsche. Another example? The Base Carrera doesn't get a manual transmission, because it's the volume 911 and that 8 speed PDK exists to elevate fuel economy numbers. Again, it's all about these numbers.
Frankly, I don't understand the obsession with NA motors. You don't see anyone wanting to go back to carburetors. Yes, the GT3 engine is awesome, but not every NA engine is awesome. Forced induction rocks -- better fuel economy, lower emissions, and more power everywhere with low end torque. Here's where we are going -- hybridization brings instant throttle response to the turbocharged cars. Nothing beats the throttle response of an electric motor. The hybrid/turbocharged future isn't a bad thing, that is... unless you prefer a wheezy NA engine struggling tor breathe at altitude on a mountain road.
Taycan sales made the NA GT3 possible. Porsche is working hard to bring down its fleet CO2 numbers. The GT4RS is a send-off to the ICE 718. It's not a volume car and again, that engine was made possible by the Taycan sales numbers. Porsche put the NA 4.0L in the 718, because the 4 cylinder, intended to help sales in China and elsewhere, wasn't cutting it in the US. Nobody was buying that 4cyl 718 here and it's not like the 6cyl is hot seller either. It's all emissions and fuel economy math for Porsche. Another example? The Base Carrera doesn't get a manual transmission, because it's the volume 911 and that 8 speed PDK exists to elevate fuel economy numbers. Again, it's all about these numbers.
Frankly, I don't understand the obsession with NA motors. You don't see anyone wanting to go back to carburetors. Yes, the GT3 engine is awesome, but not every NA engine is awesome. Forced induction rocks -- better fuel economy, lower emissions, and more power everywhere with low end torque. Here's where we are going -- hybridization brings instant throttle response to the turbocharged cars. Nothing beats the throttle response of an electric motor. The hybrid/turbocharged future isn't a bad thing, that is... unless you prefer a wheezy NA engine struggling tor breathe at altitude on a mountain road.
The following 17 users liked this post by detansinn:
audimotion (01-28-2023),
Cueball (02-25-2023),
dhirm5 (01-28-2023),
jlegelis (02-09-2023),
JoeyBagadonuts (05-02-2023),
and 12 others liked this post.