View Poll Results: Your 992, did you buy, lease or finance?
I bought it outright
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar2-l.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar2.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar2-r.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/clear.gif)
168
58.13%
I leased it
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar3-l.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar3.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar3-r.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/clear.gif)
9
3.11%
Financed with under $ 1K a month payment
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar4-l.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar4.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar4-r.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/clear.gif)
29
10.03%
Financed with under $ 2K a month payment
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar5-l.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar5.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar5-r.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/clear.gif)
65
22.49%
Household income is under $ 250K a year
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar6-l.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar6.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar6-r.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/clear.gif)
34
11.76%
Household income is over $ 250K a year
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar1-l.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar1.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/polls/bar1-r.gif)
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/clear.gif)
125
43.25%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 289. You may not vote on this poll
Your Money and Your 992
#61
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
GDP = private consumption + gross private investment + government investment + government spending + (exports – imports)
1. private consumption + gross private investment => income after tax
2. government investment + government spending => tax + government debt
3. (exports – imports) => always negative for US, related to income of US resident or our trading partners.
Thus, 1 + 2 should be the income of all the people in the US.
So, ( GDP/capita ) x ( # of persons in an average HH ) should be pretty close to HH income.
Since # 3 is always negative for the US, GDP x (# ppl in HH) should be less than the surveyed HH income.
But, but, but... now GDP is not even a meaningful number at all, not comparable to any income data, because cheating went on for too long.
In the 1970s, GDP/capita was about 60% of surveyed HH income, now the two are about the same.
But why am I lecturing about GDP here?![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Oh, HH income...
1. private consumption + gross private investment => income after tax
2. government investment + government spending => tax + government debt
3. (exports – imports) => always negative for US, related to income of US resident or our trading partners.
Thus, 1 + 2 should be the income of all the people in the US.
So, ( GDP/capita ) x ( # of persons in an average HH ) should be pretty close to HH income.
Since # 3 is always negative for the US, GDP x (# ppl in HH) should be less than the surveyed HH income.
But, but, but... now GDP is not even a meaningful number at all, not comparable to any income data, because cheating went on for too long.
In the 1970s, GDP/capita was about 60% of surveyed HH income, now the two are about the same.
But why am I lecturing about GDP here?
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Oh, HH income...
Last edited by Nibiru12; 01-18-2023 at 02:21 PM.
#62
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
GDP = private consumption + gross private investment + government investment + government spending + (exports – imports)
1. private consumption + gross private investment => income after tax
2. government investment + government spending => tax + government debt
3. (exports – imports) => always negative for US, related to income of US resident or our trading partners.
Thus, 1 + 2 should be the income of all the people in the US.
So, ( GDP/capita ) x ( # of persons in an average HH ) should be pretty close to HH income.
Since # 3 is always negative for the US, GDP x (# ppl in HH) should be less than the surveyed HH income.
But, but, but... now GDP is not even a meaningful number at all, not comparable to any income data, because cheating went on for too long.
In the 1970s, GDP/capita was about 60% of surveyed HH income, now the two are about the same.
But why am I lecturing about GDP here?![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Oh, HH income...
1. private consumption + gross private investment => income after tax
2. government investment + government spending => tax + government debt
3. (exports – imports) => always negative for US, related to income of US resident or our trading partners.
Thus, 1 + 2 should be the income of all the people in the US.
So, ( GDP/capita ) x ( # of persons in an average HH ) should be pretty close to HH income.
Since # 3 is always negative for the US, GDP x (# ppl in HH) should be less than the surveyed HH income.
But, but, but... now GDP is not even a meaningful number at all, not comparable to any income data, because cheating went on for too long.
In the 1970s, GDP/capita was about 60% of surveyed HH income, now the two are about the same.
But why am I lecturing about GDP here?
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Oh, HH income...