Porsche - to Build the 911 You've Always Wanted (4.0L NA) in a Non-GT
#16
Just an observation, but the brakes on the test mule appear to be the same as the 992.1 GTS. That is to say, larger than the base and S model brakes, and the front calipers are mounted higher than on a GT3, amonst other things. This likely means this is a GTS model.
So if this is a GTS model, why are we spotting it testing before seeing the lesser versions? Isn't the GTS introduced several months to a year or so after the base and S models of the facelift?
So if this is a GTS model, why are we spotting it testing before seeing the lesser versions? Isn't the GTS introduced several months to a year or so after the base and S models of the facelift?
#17
Just an observation, but the brakes on the test mule appear to be the same as the 992.1 GTS. That is to say, larger than the base and S model brakes, and the front calipers are mounted higher than on a GT3, amonst other things. This likely means this is a GTS model.
So if this is a GTS model, why are we spotting it testing before seeing the lesser versions? Isn't the GTS introduced several months to a year or so after the base and S models of the facelift?
So if this is a GTS model, why are we spotting it testing before seeing the lesser versions? Isn't the GTS introduced several months to a year or so after the base and S models of the facelift?
Last edited by CodyBigdog; 02-03-2022 at 09:35 PM.
The following users liked this post:
SBAD (02-12-2022)
#19
They can't even deliver 911s to keep up with demand, why would they be adding more models to the lineup. furthermore, Why would the come out with a cheaper model when people are paying top dollar for used ones?
The following users liked this post:
Michael Russell (02-04-2022)
#20
I know this is near-heresy, but I like turbo engines. At least for daily driving. It’s great having torque down low. I drove an E9x M3 for a while and being high in the rev range was truly glorious, but it wasn’t somewhere I got to visit much on the street.
#21
Makes perfect sense to make this 992 T model with NA engine at 390-400hp. It will slot above base model but have lightweight options like GTS such as LWB, PCCB, RAS, lightweight glass etc.
This would be more about back to basics driving engagement rather than performance figures and power like GTS.
This would be more about back to basics driving engagement rather than performance figures and power like GTS.
Last edited by R N M; 02-04-2022 at 01:06 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by R N M:
#23
For the last 20 years Porsche has been adding variants and playing with the timing and availability of them. Plenty of people couldn’t see the reasoning behind a GTS slotting in between the S and GT3 right after the housing market melt down. Yet today those models have some of the best depreciation.
Porsche also has a tick-tock chassis-drivetrain cycle going. Release a new body, then release major drivetrain changes. If you’re looking at ways to improve your product while just focusing on the engine, a 911 without the turbos would cost less than the base to manufacture and sell for more.
Last edited by DriverDaily; 02-04-2022 at 10:02 AM.
The following users liked this post:
porscheprestige (02-12-2022)
#26
I have a new GTS on order, if Porsche came out with a new 992 GTS with an NA motor I would drive my GTS until the day my new one arrived... I don't care how much power it makes where, I want it to be fun and involving.
The following users liked this post:
NastyHabits (02-05-2022)
The following users liked this post:
Rxpert (02-19-2022)
#28
#30
And still more speculation ... this time putting some water on the "NA 4.0 engine in the 992.2 911" flames.
https://www.evo.co.uk/porsche/911/20...rototype-spied
https://www.evo.co.uk/porsche/911/20...rototype-spied