Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Weight Saving Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2020 | 08:39 AM
  #16  
russbert's Avatar
russbert
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 733
From: Smoky Mtns, Tennessee
Default

Doesn't an after market exhaust usually give you a weight savings as well? (18.5 lbs or so).

For me, if I went on a diet that would represent a nice weight savings as well. Whoops, I'd better stop eating all of that popcorn.
The following 2 users liked this post by russbert:
markchristenson (07-07-2020), Todd C (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 11:53 AM
  #17  
markchristenson's Avatar
markchristenson
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 645
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by gcurnew
My best guess on relative roof weights: lightest to heaviest.



The Carbon Fibre roof would be the lightest (better be considering the cost).


The second-lightest would be the standard aluminum non-opening roof (Porsche illustration shows aluminum panels in green).
https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/2019...911-18802.html



The opening metal sunroof would be appreciably heavier than the non-opening roof as it's steel rather than aluminum (according to the configurator) and also has motor and cassette.



The glass roof is likely the heaviest option: glass weighs a lot compared to aluminum or steel and there is also motor and cassette.
That would be my guess as well. I would love to know the actual weight differences. I don’t think there is a huge difference from the carbon (around 4 pounds, although it is weight up high which makes a bigger difference than 4 pounds down low). I’m guessing maybe 20 pounds additional for the steel sunroof and then maybe another 5-10 (for a total of 25-30) for the glass?
Old 07-07-2020 | 12:37 PM
  #18  
Vintage72's Avatar
Vintage72
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 404
From: Austin
Default

FOR ME, 911s with any sunroof is one of my few, absolute no gos. I understand some people love sunroofs and they should order it how they want, but go cab instead or stay coupe, don't split the baby.
The following 3 users liked this post by Vintage72:
dashanin (08-18-2020), markchristenson (07-07-2020), Todd C (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 12:46 PM
  #19  
Drizz's Avatar
Drizz
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 292
Likes: 221
From: The OC
Default

Drive around by yourself vs with a passenger. Weight savings approx 110-300lbs (depending on passenger)
The following 2 users liked this post by Drizz:
G650 (07-08-2020), Todd C (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 02:06 PM
  #20  
Vintage72's Avatar
Vintage72
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 404
From: Austin
Default

Originally Posted by Drizz
Drive around by yourself vs with a passenger. Weight savings approx 110-300lbs (depending on passenger)
Passengers are my least favorite thing in a 911 - couldn't agree more.
The following users liked this post:
Drizz (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 02:14 PM
  #21  
markchristenson's Avatar
markchristenson
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 645
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Drizz
Drive around by yourself vs with a passenger. Weight savings approx 110-300lbs (depending on passenger)
I remember doing autocrosses, having an instructor with me, and then for the timed runs it was just me. The braking points totally changed.
The following users liked this post:
Drizz (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 02:54 PM
  #22  
ipse dixit's Avatar
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,320
Likes: 12,262
Default

One thing to keep in mind about reducing weight that I think many people overlook is balance.

Yes, it's good to reduce weight with a lightweight battery, but then that just makes the front of the car even lighter (vis-a-vis the rear), which will throw off the cornering and braking of the car (as the stock suspension setup is tuned for a certain weight and weight distribution). Not to mention how this will affect the aero of the car at speed.

This is less of an issue when we are talking about reducing mass or weight equally from the car -- i.e., wheels or brakes -- but it is still something to consider as, again, the suspension is not necessarily setup for what can be described as not insignificant weight reduction.
The following 2 users liked this post by ipse dixit:
dashanin (08-18-2020), G650 (07-08-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 04:52 PM
  #23  
swagon's Avatar
swagon
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 109
Likes: 75
Default

The Exclusive wheels are the only OEM forged set for the 992, don't know the numbers, but I bet higher-end HREs or BBS in 19" would still be lighter.
Old 07-07-2020 | 05:10 PM
  #24  
smiles11's Avatar
smiles11
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 3,411
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
One thing to keep in mind about reducing weight that I think many people overlook is balance.

Yes, it's good to reduce weight with a lightweight battery, but then that just makes the front of the car even lighter (vis-a-vis the rear), which will throw off the cornering and braking of the car (as the stock suspension setup is tuned for a certain weight and weight distribution). Not to mention how this will affect the aero of the car at speed.

This is less of an issue when we are talking about reducing mass or weight equally from the car -- i.e., wheels or brakes -- but it is still something to consider as, again, the suspension is not necessarily setup for what can be described as not insignificant weight reduction.
This is true. A big reason why most shouldn't worry about the extra 60lb power seats; since it's weight helps offset some of the rear weight bias
Old 07-07-2020 | 05:14 PM
  #25  
inastrangeland's Avatar
inastrangeland
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 706
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
One thing to keep in mind about reducing weight that I think many people overlook is balance.

Yes, it's good to reduce weight with a lightweight battery, but then that just makes the front of the car even lighter (vis-a-vis the rear), which will throw off the cornering and braking of the car (as the stock suspension setup is tuned for a certain weight and weight distribution). Not to mention how this will affect the aero of the car at speed.

This is less of an issue when we are talking about reducing mass or weight equally from the car -- i.e., wheels or brakes -- but it is still something to consider as, again, the suspension is not necessarily setup for what can be described as not insignificant weight reduction.
Should be able to factor some the weight out using corner balancing. But that presumes height adjustable springs.
Old 07-07-2020 | 06:47 PM
  #26  
markchristenson's Avatar
markchristenson
Thread Starter
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 645
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by inastrangeland
Should be able to factor some the weight out using corner balancing. But that presumes height adjustable springs.
One more thing to budget now :-)
Old 07-07-2020 | 07:10 PM
  #27  
Dan Nagy's Avatar
Dan Nagy
Race Car
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,509
Likes: 2,220
From: The Beach
Default

Originally Posted by smiles11
This is true. A big reason why most shouldn't worry about the extra 60lb power seats; since it's weight helps offset some of the rear weight bias
Oh yeah, I am totally using that. “I ordered all this extra crap to properly balance my car, dear.”
The following 2 users liked this post by Dan Nagy:
SamD (07-08-2020), Todd C (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 07:15 PM
  #28  
smiles11's Avatar
smiles11
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 3,411
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Nagy
Oh yeah, I am totally using that. “I ordered all this extra crap to properly balance my car, dear.”
Anything helps lol but I've needed a lot more than that to justify my 911's
Old 07-07-2020 | 08:16 PM
  #29  
Antigravity's Avatar
Antigravity
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 1,078
Default

Originally Posted by markchristenson
I seem to recall a thread that showed how much weight the carbon roof saves, and thought it was around 4 pounds (3.8 sticks in my mind for some reason). I cannot find that thread any longer, despite spending a bunch of time searching.

However, that got me thinking about all the options that save weight. (If this information already exists in one place, happy to be pointed that direction and can delete this thread.)

Factory options:

Carbon roof: 30% compared to steel (IIRC 3-4 pounds)
PCCB: 40 pounds (based on some other threads I saw)
4-way vs. 14-/18-way seats: ~60 pounds
Lightweight/insulated glass: 8 pounds
Sunroof delete: ??? (this almost seems like it would a weight increase depending on which of the two sunroof options a buyer spec'd)
Manual Transmission: 77 pounds
Base interior (i.e., not full leather): ???

Aftermarket options to save weight:

Aftermarket wheels: 20-40 pounds
AntiGravity Battery: 40 pounds
Exhaust: 18 pounds (depends on specific system)

I can update this with other options/suggestions as they come up.
When you're ready to move forward on the battery just let us know and we'll make sure you're taken care of. For those that haven't seen or are wondering what the battery is all about feel free to check out our new Video below. It's a little long but informative and of course as always feel free to reach out to us with any questions you might have.
-Chad
chad@antigravitybatteries.com
The following users liked this post:
markchristenson (07-07-2020)
Old 07-07-2020 | 10:05 PM
  #30  
Vintage72's Avatar
Vintage72
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 404
From: Austin
Default

Thank you - I love my Antigravity Battery. Easy install and no problems or codes thrown. It is a real DIY. When I put that and Soul Performance side deletes in the back of my Touring, it lost 75 lbs. without breaking a sweat. And, my battery never skipped a beat.


Quick Reply: Weight Saving Options



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:03 AM.