Carrera S vs Turbo S visually...
There are simply too many TTS produced for the car to qualify as a supercar/exotic. It’s just not rare or exclusive enough.
But get it on a track, and it will greedily eat the lunches of the vast, vast majority of current supercars. And it will drive to that track and pick up In-N-Out on the way, while those supercars are trailered in like delicate butterflies. The performance aspect of the TTS is absolutely qualifiying.
If Porsche reduced production of the TTS to like 50-100 cars a year... Boom, it’s a supercar.
Come to think of it, there are a fair number of bonafide supercars that the regular old 992 S will spank on the track...
1. Limited and/or handbuilt production
2. Liberal use of exotic materials for the time
3. Utility extremely compromised in the name of extreme performance
4. Not derived from a car that failed the above three criteria
No 911 passes the above criteria. The Carrera GT and 918 do pass.
The above criteria holds for historic cars as well. For example, the Miura passes as well as the Ferrari F40 passes.
You cant use raw performance numbers as criteria, because classic supercars are considerably slower than modern cars.
1. Limited and/or handbuilt production
2. Liberal use of exotic materials for the time
3. Utility extremely compromised in the name of extreme performance
4. Not derived from a car that failed the above three criteria
No 911 passes the above criteria. The Carrera GT and 918 do pass.
The above criteria holds for historic cars as well. For example, the Miura passes as well as the Ferrari F40 passes.
You cant use raw performance numbers as criteria, because classic supercars are considerably slower than modern cars.
”Using the configurator I built a Carrera S and Turbo S.... interesting to note the similarities between the two models. Given the leap in price, what would make you go for a Turbo S over the Carrera S?
I’m somewhat on the fence...here in South Africa, for the price of a Turbo S, I could pick up a well specced Carrera S and a Cayenne Coupe....”
I live in Southern California, and I’ve put 3,500 miles on my Carrera S over the past 6 months, with a good mix of city, freeway, and canyon driving, and not once have I said, “I wish this car would go faster”. In fact, the majority of the time I have to hold back, out of concern for getting a ticket.
Matt Farrah, who reviewed both the Carrera S and the Turbo S for “The Smoking Tire” said that he really couldn’t perceive much of a difference between the 2 cars at speeds less than 100 Mph. He went on to say that the only real difference between the two is that the Turbo S will get you sent to jail faster.
Last edited by G650; Jun 18, 2020 at 01:51 PM.
1. Limited and/or handbuilt production
2. Liberal use of exotic materials for the time
3. Utility extremely compromised in the name of extreme performance
4. Not derived from a car that failed the above three criteria
No 911 passes the above criteria. The Carrera GT and 918 do pass.
The above criteria holds for historic cars as well. For example, the Miura passes as well as the Ferrari F40 passes.
You cant use raw performance numbers as criteria, because classic supercars are considerably slower than modern cars.
Merely pointing out that when it comes to pure performance, the TTS will get around a track faster than most current supercars. And the GT2 RS (on a good day) will get around one faster than any other production car period.
It doesn't have a race-derived, motorsport engine (its basically a pumped up 991 TTS engine), nor a true dry sump, and its chassis is basically the same as any old 991 911. Yes, it has some carbon bits, more body panels for downforce, magnesium wheels (as an option), and rose-jointed bearings, but those are all add-ons and not really all that exotic.
I dont even really consider the TTS a supercar. Its a wonderful car at the pinnacle of all sports cars. Its insane to call it a supercar as its no more supercar than a 720S is hypercar even though they both blur their lines respectively.
The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts
It doesn't have a race-derived, motorsport engine (its basically a pumped up 991 TTS engine), nor a true dry sump, and its chassis is basically the same as any old 991 911. Yes, it has some carbon bits, more body panels for downforce, magnesium wheels (as an option), and rose-jointed bearings, but those are all add-ons and not really all that exotic.
Others in a similar price point
- Low mile 720S w/ CPO can be had in 2018 model year for 245K. A friend just snagged one.
- 2019 leftover 600LT can be had for the same price.
- Low mile Performante
- New Huracan EVO RWD
- Low mile 488GTB
- Low mile Aston DBS Superlegerra
I think Porsche pushed their price point into a world they can't compete with the TTS at 250-260K
If a true supercar is defined by lack of comfort, extraordinary maintenance costs, and cars that only your less than favorite friends can own then I'm happy to stick with my TTS which is "super" to me and king of the road in most instances.
It doesn't have a race-derived, motorsport engine (its basically a pumped up 991 TTS engine), nor a true dry sump, and its chassis is basically the same as any old 991 911. Yes, it has some carbon bits, more body panels for downforce, magnesium wheels (as an option), and rose-jointed bearings, but those are all add-ons and not really all that exotic.
I mean, doesn’t it seem kind of silly to exclude the GT2 RS, literally the fastest production car in the world (where a track is concerned) from “supercar” contention, merely because it didn’t need to be hand-formed entirely from NASA-spec carbon-ceramic waffling and produced in batches of three a year to achieve that standing?




