Max G-force pic
#16
I don't get how you guys got numbers like this when even a GT3 can't pull more than 1.24 on the skid pad.??
https://fastestlaps.com/lists/top-grip-kings
https://fastestlaps.com/lists/top-grip-kings
That depends, as mentioned above, on the track, radius and mostly the camber the track. I believe those tests are standardized in order to compare different cars.
This is one lap on this particular track (Blackhawk Farms): https://drive.google.com/file/d/17Dt...w?usp=drivesdk
I was hoping to improve all the g's at Road America, the virus messed up the season. Fast curves and some hard breaking.
This is one lap on this particular track (Blackhawk Farms): https://drive.google.com/file/d/17Dt...w?usp=drivesdk
I was hoping to improve all the g's at Road America, the virus messed up the season. Fast curves and some hard breaking.
The following users liked this post:
G650 (05-13-2020)
#17
Originally Posted by 992Sam
in that video it never pulls more than 1.1g lateral tho.. which further makes my point.. I can't see how the car pulled the numbers you did... exceeds anything out there,
The following users liked this post:
markchristenson (05-13-2020)
#18
#20
Originally Posted by markchristenson
I saw a 1.5 in there :-)
Interesting that I managed 1.24 on my prior car (991.2 base cab). AWD plays a role, but the improved chassis, SPASM, wheelbase and 18w seats are also major factors. It's quite capable and improved from an already great car.
We talk a lot about those lateral g's and suspension and chassis, but we shouldn't forget that the buck stops on the seats. The 18w seats on the 992 deserves a lot of praise, IMO, specially with a bad back.
#21
One point I'd like to make is that I personally have quite low normal blood pressure readings, which to me means that I am more likely to have difficulty with high G-loads. I had no difficulty with the acceleration and braking G-loads that my 991.1 GTS generated. I believe I would have felt uncomfortable with lateral G-loads at 1.45 and above if they had been generated on a level surface, yet I had no difficulty at all in the 1.45-1.53 range per the G-Meter. More accurately, there was enough down load/pressure on my car to allow such a high measurement.
Here’s a great example of Vertical G, both positive and negative. It’s a workout.
Love the GTS by the way.
#23
I think you may be confusing the affects of blood pressure on vertical and lateral G. Lateral G, which we experience to a minor extent in our cars has little affect. The affect of vertical G and blood pressure are more significant. Hence, the blood leaving the brain and people taking naps at inopportune moments. However, blood pressure is only one small aspect of g tolerance. Interestingly, even small amounts of negative G is not well tolerated by humans.
Here’s a great example of Vertical G, both positive and negative. It’s a workout.
https://youtu.be/eXaPfUs6sQw
Love the GTS by the way.
Here’s a great example of Vertical G, both positive and negative. It’s a workout.
https://youtu.be/eXaPfUs6sQw
Love the GTS by the way.
The following users liked this post:
orthobird (08-13-2023)
#27
I don't have a pic, but I floored the car for the first time today since I put on a set of PS4S tires (315's on the rear) for the summer and I hit 1.08. I'm curious to see what I'll get using launch control, but I want to wait until I break my new tires in a bit first.
#29
Second try. Same road, but it was a little bit later in the day and warmer (65° vs maybe 55-60°). I switched climate control off completely so my A/C wasn't running. And I had also just washed the car. Everyone knows cars drive better after a car wash. I swear my car feels faster now that I've been driving it harder. I think the ECU adapted or something.