Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2021 Turbo S- 640 HP Just Wow!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2020, 05:30 PM
  #31  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,969
Likes: 0
Received 11,681 Likes on 5,112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
And Porsche could make a lighter Turbo S ... at maybe double the current price. Would people pay for that? Probably not.
Originally Posted by frankchn
I mean technically they already do: the GT2 RS is a RWD Turbo on steroids I don't think that car appeals to most Turbo buyers though.
The 991 GT2 RS is no waif in the weight department. It comes it at ~3300 lbs.
Old 02-07-2020, 07:44 PM
  #32  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,059
Received 4,982 Likes on 2,817 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
The 991 GT2 RS is no waif in the weight department. It comes it at ~3300 lbs.
I’m sure it’s a good deal more in reality. My light GT3 build is nearly that much on race scales...
Old 02-07-2020, 08:37 PM
  #33  
chance6
Race Car
 
chance6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere out East
Posts: 3,799
Received 1,503 Likes on 963 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by detansinn
The 991.2 Turbo S weighed in at up to 3682lb. The Turbo cars haven’t really never been the “light” 911. Wider and maxed out with luxury options that add weight.

People need to stop losing their minds over the weight of the 992 — it’s really no heavier than then it’s predecessor. On the scales, with equivalent equipment and fluids, the 992 is only about 30-50lbs more than the 991.2 despite having a wider front track and other improvements. It’s a “who cares” weight difference on a car that weighs north of 3,000lbs.

If you want a “lighter” current model 911, that is what the GT3 cars are for and they’re a very different experience than the luxury of a Turbo. It should be noted that, while the GT3 is light for a 911, it is still by no means a “lightweight” sports car. Heck, it weighs 1,000lbs more than my Alfa 4C.
Curb weight of the 991.2 TTS is 3528 lbs. I know they quote weight differently now BUT the 992 IS heavier. And the 992 TTS may be a bigger delta because dammit we're dealing with wide wide bodies here.

A car weighing 3650 lb is not a who cares over a car that weighs 3153 lb. Yep TTS cars are great but they have some pork.
The following users liked this post:
Yzfrr11 (02-08-2020)
Old 02-07-2020, 09:21 PM
  #34  
Penn4S
Rennlist Member
 
Penn4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,736
Received 1,335 Likes on 752 Posts
Default

3550 for my TTS. No ballerina. But dances like one.
The following 3 users liked this post by Penn4S:
detansinn (02-07-2020), russbert (02-09-2020), TopspeedPT (02-14-2020)
Old 02-07-2020, 10:16 PM
  #35  
911-TOUR
Rennlist Member
 
911-TOUR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: At the outer marker...
Posts: 1,611
Received 311 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

My 993 was smaller than my buddies mini cooper...

Only way I see to make 991/992 size cars go sub 3K lbs is to move the monocoque to Carbon Fiber...oh so much want.

cheers!
Old 02-09-2020, 12:23 AM
  #36  
XrussianX
Pro
 
XrussianX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milton, WA
Posts: 589
Received 395 Likes on 175 Posts
Default

Weight can be good if the chassis and driver can use it to their advantage with weight transfer. Watch some rally drivers if you want to see a great example. The problem is still in the fact that all this weight numbs out the feedback. Basically you have to push the car harder to get a similar rush. But like others have said Porsche isn’t just adding weight to make the cars heavier. It’s the demands of the gov and customers wanting options. Buy an older car if lighter weight is your flavor. I personally can’t wait to see what these 992’s will do compared to the competition. In Porsche we trust
Old 02-09-2020, 12:04 PM
  #37  
Argon_
Pro
 
Argon_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 708
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
I agree and with the weight saving measures that have been introduced since the air-cooled days, some of the new models could be sub-3,000 pounds if the size reverted to air-cooled size.
The small offset crash test makes a narrow car exceedingly difficult to certify, with a metal chassis at least. It could be built of carbon, 73RS sized, with 400 N/A horsepower.
Old 02-09-2020, 02:19 PM
  #38  
XrussianX
Pro
 
XrussianX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milton, WA
Posts: 589
Received 395 Likes on 175 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Argon_
The small offset crash test makes a narrow car exceedingly difficult to certify, with a metal chassis at least. It could be built of carbon, 73RS sized, with 400 N/A horsepower.
carbon body would have to be the next step in order to save weight. Carbon is 1.5 times lighter than aluminum by volume. That sounds like a substantial weight saving to be had. But at what cost? Not many would she’ll out $300k+ for a 911 Turbo
Old 02-09-2020, 05:50 PM
  #39  
detansinn
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
detansinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 5,672
Received 8,135 Likes on 3,006 Posts
Default

The shift to a carbon fiber monocoque would be a big deal and huge change for the 911.
I have driven cars with carbon fiber tubs and my 992 C4S currently shares the garage with such a car. Over the past two generations, the 911 has evolved into a luxury GT that also happens to be an amazing sports car that can even play pretend supercar. From my experience, it's going to be very difficult for Porsche to deliver those luxury GT qualities with a stiff carbon fiber tub. Much of the potential weight savings would likely be offset with soundproofing/deadening material added all over the car.

Does that mean that it will never happen? Not necessarily, but I don't think that we will see a 911 from Porsche with a carbon fiber monocoque until the car goes full EV. With the engine gone, there's less noise and vibration to deal with.
Yes, I am aware that Ruf sells a "911" with a carbon fiber tub, but that car is no luxury GT.
Old 02-09-2020, 11:14 PM
  #40  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,969
Likes: 0
Received 11,681 Likes on 5,112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by detansinn
The shift to a carbon fiber monocoque would be a big deal and huge change for the 911.
I have driven cars with carbon fiber tubs and my 992 C4S currently shares the garage with such a car. Over the past two generations, the 911 has evolved into a luxury GT that also happens to be an amazing sports car that can even play pretend supercar. From my experience, it's going to be very difficult for Porsche to deliver those luxury GT qualities with a stiff carbon fiber tub. Much of the potential weight savings would likely be offset with soundproofing/deadening material added all over the car.

Does that mean that it will never happen? Not necessarily, but I don't think that we will see a 911 from Porsche with a carbon fiber monocoque until the car goes full EV. With the engine gone, there's less noise and vibration to deal with.
Yes, I am aware that Ruf sells a "911" with a carbon fiber tub, but that car is no luxury GT.
A 911 will never have a carbon monocoque, at least not in the same way a McLaren has a carbon monocoque.
The following users liked this post:
detansinn (02-10-2020)
Old 02-10-2020, 12:11 PM
  #41  
FORENN
Banned
 
FORENN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,651
Received 666 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by detansinn
People need to stop losing their minds over the weight of the 992 — it’s really no heavier than then it’s predecessor. On the scales, with equivalent equipment and fluids, the 992 is only about 30-50lbs more than the 991.2 despite having a wider front track and other improvements. It’s a “who cares” weight difference on a car that weighs north of 3,000lbs.
If that's the case, then the 992 should weigh about the same as the 997 (which is widely considered one of the best 911 generations ever), as the 991 was a little lighter than the 997 when it was introduced. Just pointing this out for some historic perspective.
Old 02-10-2020, 12:25 PM
  #42  
captainkirk
Pro
 
captainkirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Somewhere in Space....the final frontier
Posts: 740
Received 23 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

This is the car I am going for. It doesn't have the fugly third wart red light; and I guess I will have to be okay with tiny gear selector.

Now if they fix the 992.2 cosmetically for GTS - then I will be in dilemma.
Old 02-10-2020, 03:19 PM
  #43  
Sunny_M3
Pro
 
Sunny_M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 645
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by detansinn
Correct, but the new cars make more power than the old ones, so, don't put yourself under too much pressure. LOL
Do you mean...boost pressure
Old 02-10-2020, 05:51 PM
  #44  
frankchn
Pro
 
frankchn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 574
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

Autocar came out with an article today that mentions that the Turbo will be launched at Geneva, but they are quoting 620 hp for the TTS and 570 hp for the TT. It will be interesting to see where the final power figures land.
The following users liked this post:
chance6 (02-11-2020)
Old 02-11-2020, 12:02 AM
  #45  
chance6
Race Car
 
chance6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere out East
Posts: 3,799
Received 1,503 Likes on 963 Posts
Default

Geneva sounds right...the 997 TTS had 530 hp, went to 560 in 991.1 TTS. The 620 hp may actually be right!

And the 570 hp for TT makes sense- 10 hp below current TTS, which is what they did when the 991.1 debuted (520 vs. 530).


Quick Reply: 2021 Turbo S- 640 HP Just Wow!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:17 PM.