Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

992 is 60lbs heavier than the 991

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2020, 08:44 AM
  #1  
detansinn
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
detansinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 5,690
Received 8,173 Likes on 3,019 Posts
Default 992 is 60lbs heavier than the 991

Motortrend's Jonny Lieberman has been doing this cool design comparison series on Instagram. A few hours ago, he posted a 992 vs 991 comparison, taking aim at the size and weight nonsense. The car is an inch longer and 60lbs heavier than the 991.2. See below.



Last edited by detansinn; 01-28-2020 at 11:46 AM.
Old 01-28-2020, 09:59 AM
  #2  
ryandarr1979
Three Wheelin'
 
ryandarr1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 1,263
Received 839 Likes on 418 Posts
Default

Compared to the base Carrera, yes, it’s 60lbs heavier, but compared to a GTS, which both are now widebodies, the difference is negligible, hence why the 992 Carrera S and 991.2 GTS have such similar performance.
Old 01-28-2020, 10:51 AM
  #3  
gcurnew
Rennlist Member
 
gcurnew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 1,871
Received 1,639 Likes on 786 Posts
Default

Looking forward to Lieberman's "get a grip people" followups on the 992 gauges, dash design, door handles and other "issues" that wound a small group of folks in knots.
The following 2 users liked this post by gcurnew:
detansinn (01-28-2020), SamD (01-28-2020)
Old 01-28-2020, 11:27 AM
  #4  
Hp12c
Racer
 
Hp12c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 410
Received 227 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

This is great, I’ve been wondering about adjusting for this and that, and this answers a lot of that.

I feel liked I’ve read so many articles where the author speaks to it being obviously larger, wider, heavier, etc, and I think a lot of that is nuanced.

so... theoretically, a Carrera 4S, which was already in a “medium-body”, with the “lightweight” transmission (7mt, which I assume doesn’t have the extra weight of the 992 PDK’s new “hybrid-ready” features), might come in exactly the same width, under an inch longer, same wheelbase, wider track, and maybe even under 50lbs heavier.

My ordered 992 C2S is more lightly optioned than my 991.2 C2S, I dropped a glass sunroof, 18-ways and RAS, who knows, maybe I’m close to even...
The following users liked this post:
detansinn (01-28-2020)
Old 01-28-2020, 11:48 AM
  #5  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,172
Received 6,504 Likes on 2,826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hp12c
This is great, I’ve been wondering about adjusting for this and that, and this answers a lot of that.

I feel liked I’ve read so many articles where the author speaks to it being obviously larger, wider, heavier, etc, and I think a lot of that is nuanced.

so... theoretically, a Carrera 4S, which was already in a “medium-body”, with the “lightweight” transmission (7mt, which I assume doesn’t have the extra weight of the 992 PDK’s new “hybrid-ready” features), might come in exactly the same width, under an inch longer, same wheelbase, wider track, and maybe even under 50lbs heavier.

My ordered 992 C2S is more lightly optioned than my 991.2 C2S, I dropped a glass sunroof, 18-ways and RAS, who knows, maybe I’m close to even...
18 ways and glass sunroof are heavy I suspect - those are some of the easiest ways to shed pounds. RAS is not that bad.

I didn't want a sunroof and I preferred the 4 ways, so it worked out for me. If I wanted either 18 ways or sunroof, I'm not sure weight would dissuade me. It's more like a nice bonus.
Old 01-28-2020, 12:12 PM
  #6  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,591
Received 322 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

The 992 is not quite there but is creeping back up to 997 weight.
Old 01-28-2020, 12:58 PM
  #7  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,302
Received 299 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

According to the cars C&D tested/weighed, the base 992 C2S was very slightly heavier. But the 991 C2S test car had PCCB, without which it would have been very slightly heavier (I posted links in another thread around here a few weeks ago).

I expect once we see manual transmission models tested, and GT models with their PDK-S transmissions, the 992 will be decisively lighter.
Old 01-28-2020, 01:53 PM
  #8  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,172
Received 6,504 Likes on 2,826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
According to the cars C&D tested/weighed, the base 992 C2S was very slightly heavier. But the 991 C2S test car had PCCB, without which it would have been very slightly heavier (I posted links in another thread around here a few weeks ago).

I expect once we see manual transmission models tested, and GT models with their PDK-S transmissions, the 992 will be decisively lighter.
I thought PCCBs are lighter - neighborhood of 40 lbs
Old 01-28-2020, 03:48 PM
  #9  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,302
Received 299 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Yes...the weight difference between the two [Edit: US spec] C&D test cars was ~20lbs IIRC; the 991 having PCCBs...so without them it would theoretically have been ~20lbs heavier than the 992 C2S tested by C&D.

Point being, the [Edit: US spec] 992 does not appear to be 60lbs heavier, despite what Jonny said in his post.

Edit: I'm not sure he's correct about the rear being 1" longer, either...I believe it's the front, and due to the nose being a bit more 'pointy'.

Regardless, we are splitting hairs on both counts.

Last edited by Alan Smithee; 01-28-2020 at 04:14 PM.
Old 01-28-2020, 04:01 PM
  #10  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,172
Received 6,504 Likes on 2,826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
Yes...the weight difference between the two C&D test cars was ~20lbs IIRC; the 991 having PCCBs...so without them it would theoretically have been ~20lbs heavier than the 992 C2S tested by C&D.

Point being, the 992 does not appear to be 60lbs heavier, despite what Jonny said in his post.
Sorry, I had misread your post.
Old 01-28-2020, 05:56 PM
  #11  
Benedict14
Burning Brakes
 
Benedict14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: RAIM Unreliable
Posts: 854
Received 291 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rk-d
Sorry, I had misread your post.
No. You didn’t misread it. Or I’m missing something, again. Which is possible. The Smithee post stated that the 991 had PCCB. In the C&D photo, the 992 has the PCCB (lighter). Maybe they accounted for this when they drew a comparison ? In general, I’m indifferent to the slight weight or size differences. In fact, my GAF level is low.

I did enjoy (and thought fair) Lieberman's comments regarding the design differences between the cars.The front, the rear and that third light. The surfacing comment was interesting. Maybe that’s part of what we pay for versus a GT350 ? The esoteric is a little more expensive.

There’s a 992 sitting right in the middle of the F Concourse at ATL. Painted in Coca Cola racing colors. It looks cool. I remain sanguine.
Old 01-28-2020, 06:17 PM
  #12  
Golfster
Instructor
 
Golfster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: NorCal
Posts: 145
Received 81 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

The weights came from the links in the thread referencing C and D's comparison between the 992S and the AMG GT Coupe

991.2S with PCCB, Curb Weight = 3,365, Stopping Distance (70-0) = 142 ft: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...c-test-review/

992S with Standard Brakes, Curb Weight = 3,379, Stopping Distance (70-0) = 141 ft: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...hasing-apexes/

Original thread: https://rennlist.com/forums/992/1175...-gt-coupe.html





Old 01-28-2020, 06:25 PM
  #13  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,172
Received 6,504 Likes on 2,826 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Benedict14
No. You didn’t misread it. Or I’m missing something, again. Which is possible. The Smithee post stated that the 991 had PCCB. In the C&D photo, the 992 has the PCCB (lighter). Maybe they accounted for this when they drew a comparison ? In general, I’m indifferent to the slight weight or size differences. In fact, my GAF level is low.

I did enjoy (and thought fair) Lieberman's comments regarding the design differences between the cars.The front, the rear and that third light. The surfacing comment was interesting. Maybe that’s part of what we pay for versus a GT350 ? The esoteric is a little more expensive.

There’s a 992 sitting right in the middle of the F Concourse at ATL. Painted in Coca Cola racing colors. It looks cool. I remain sanguine.
You're right - I guess they just picked two pictures for the post that aren't relevant to the data they posted.
Old 01-28-2020, 06:33 PM
  #14  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,302
Received 299 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Benedict14
No. You didn’t misread it. Or I’m missing something, again. Which is possible. The Smithee post stated that the 991 had PCCB. In the C&D photo, the 992 has the PCCB (lighter). Maybe they accounted for this when they drew a comparison ? In general, I’m indifferent to the slight weight or size differences. In fact, my GAF level is low.
Yes, you are missing something. Jonny does not write or post for C&D.

Originally Posted by Golfster
The weights came from the links in the thread referencing C and D's comparison between the 992S and the AMG GT Coupe

991.2S with PCCB, Curb Weight = 3,365, Stopping Distance (70-0) = 142 ft: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...c-test-review/

992S with Standard Brakes, Curb Weight = 3,379, Stopping Distance (70-0) = 141 ft: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...hasing-apexes/

Original thread: https://rennlist.com/forums/992/1175...-gt-coupe.html
Thank you, Golfster!
Old 01-28-2020, 06:37 PM
  #15  
Benedict14
Burning Brakes
 
Benedict14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: RAIM Unreliable
Posts: 854
Received 291 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Golfster
The weights came from the links in the thread referencing C and D's comparison between the 992S and the AMG GT Coupe

991.2S with PCCB, Curb Weight = 3,365, Stopping Distance (70-0) = 142 ft: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...c-test-review/

992S with Standard Brakes, Curb Weight = 3,379, Stopping Distance (70-0) = 141 ft: https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...hasing-apexes/

Original thread: https://rennlist.com/forums/992/1175...-gt-coupe.html
Thanks. Lieberman spent so much time referring to the photos above his post, that it looked backward.

That doesn’t look like 60lb. either. But I’m probably missing something else. Or he’s full of it. 😋. Didn’t Porsche talk about the weight difference ? I’ll take their numbers ........ on weight. Not times. Maybe.


Quick Reply: 992 is 60lbs heavier than the 991



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:21 AM.