Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

It’s a 991.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2019, 09:20 PM
  #16  
T3X4S
Racer
 
T3X4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 340
Received 150 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Psorcery
992.2 is the one to get.
Agree.
Old 01-29-2019, 05:53 PM
  #17  
JAhmed
Rennlist Member
 
JAhmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: CHICAGOLAND!!!
Posts: 2,772
Received 1,872 Likes on 783 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sdl2112
Now I get their numbering....its a 997-996+991 => 992
LMAO
Old 02-06-2019, 04:36 AM
  #18  
K-A
Drifting
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Received 136 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Architecture, proportions and wheelbase are identical. And carry over engines are normal for new generation cars. This certainly isn't an absolute change in complete design philosophy like the 997>991 was. But at the end of the day, all 911's are incremental evolutions from one another, no revolutionary changes, and that's what keeps it so iconic, unique, timeless and sought after. It's the one model in the entire car market (aside from the *barf* G Wagon) that is treated as such a sacred piece of art, they don't radically change it for the sake of short term "popping smoke" effect. And that's what makes it the benchmark legend. You drive a new 911, it's like having a fresh new car and insta classic at the same time.
Old 02-06-2019, 06:46 AM
  #19  
Porsch
Banned
 
Porsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 993
Received 252 Likes on 149 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ryandarr1979
Porsche went the conservative route, and maybe that’s a good thing, because the 991.2 is awesome and in my opinion the best 911 yet.
Indeed.
Old 02-06-2019, 10:20 PM
  #20  
bkrantz
Rennlist Member
 
bkrantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SW Colorado
Posts: 5,908
Likes: 0
Received 1,030 Likes on 621 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuckbdc
It is clearly a 901 to the 8th. Porsche continues to wander around finding the way the trolls think it lost.
Don't get the 356 true believers started.
Old 02-06-2019, 11:31 PM
  #21  
Noah Fect
Rennlist Member
 
Noah Fect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,243
Received 1,299 Likes on 886 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K-A
Architecture, proportions and wheelbase are identical. And carry over engines are normal for new generation cars. This certainly isn't an absolute change in complete design philosophy like the 997>991 was. But at the end of the day, all 911's are incremental evolutions from one another, no revolutionary changes, and that's what keeps it so iconic, unique, timeless and sought after. It's the one model in the entire car market (aside from the *barf* G Wagon) that is treated as such a sacred piece of art, they don't radically change it for the sake of short term "popping smoke" effect. And that's what makes it the benchmark legend. You drive a new 911, it's like having a fresh new car and insta classic at the same time.
The Jeep Wrangler would be a better analogy than the G-Wagen, IMO. FCA knows not to mess with the Wrangler the same way an eight-year-old knows that stoves get really f***ing hot.

Interestingly, the new JLs don't seem to have attracted quite as many "This time they've really ruined it" comments as the 992.
Old 02-08-2019, 09:38 AM
  #22  
K-A
Drifting
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Received 136 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noah Fect
The Jeep Wrangler would be a better analogy than the G-Wagen, IMO. FCA knows not to mess with the Wrangler the same way an eight-year-old knows that stoves get really f***ing hot.

Interestingly, the new JLs don't seem to have attracted quite as many "This time they've really ruined it" comments as the 992.
Good point. Essentially you have the Wrangler, G Wagon, and 911 as cars that don't get messed with and truly keep their iconic design languages stubbornly true (some to lesser extents than others) to form.
Old 02-08-2019, 02:33 PM
  #23  
Skwerl
Rennlist Member
 
Skwerl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,356
Received 310 Likes on 189 Posts
Default

Going to put my flame suit on and go out on a limb to agree with you, OP. To me it looks like a refreshed 991.2, and the move is certainly not close to the 993>996 leap, nor the 996>997. The 997>991 was a far bigger update. Heck, even the 991.1>991.2 was more of a sea change as everything became turbo'd.

The funniest part to me though has been 991 fans and owners convincing themselves that their cars are some kind of boutique Enthusiasts Only throwback and not just as much the mass-market Panamera Coupe for Chinese dentists as the 992 is. Let's also not forget that the 991's interior (particularly compared to previous gens) was a button-riddled gadget fest and quite similar in design to the contemporaneous Panamera's.

I'm in a 997 myself but I'm not going to pretend it's from a bygone era when Porsche was a niche sports car maker.
Old 02-09-2019, 02:34 AM
  #24  
Tangerine
Pro
 
Tangerine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 705
Received 124 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

I'm confused--I thought the 992 was the first 911 to use the MMB platform?

Just because the dimensions are the same doesn't mean it is the same. I expect they went to great lengths to KEEP it as similar as possible. Switching the platform is almost as big of a deal as going air cooled to water cooled.

Or did the platform switch not happen?



Quick Reply: It’s a 991.3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:26 AM.